Marina Bleken

Marina Bleken

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

41Years (1986-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 January 2015 in Soil Biology and Biochemistry
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
RFR.B. Frøseth
R.B. Frøseth
MBMarina Bleken
Marina Bleken

1 December 2004 in Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
HSHåvard Steinshamn
Håvard Steinshamn
ETErling Thuen
Erling Thuen
MBMarina Bleken
Marina Bleken
UBUlrik Tutein Brenøe
Ulrik Tutein Brenøe
GEGeorg Ekerholt
Georg Ekerholt
CYCecilie Yri
Cecilie Yri

1 January 2014 in European Journal of Agronomy
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
RFRandi Berland Frøseth
Randi Berland Frøseth
ABAnne Kjersti Bakken
Anne Kjersti Bakken
MBMarina Bleken
Marina Bleken
HRHugh Riley
Hugh Riley
RPReidun Pommeresche
Reidun Pommeresche
SHSissel Hansen
Sissel Hansen
In repeatedly mown and mulched green manure leys, the mulched herbage contains substantial amounts of nitrogen (N), which may only slightly contribute to the following crops’ nutrient demand. The objective of the present work was to evaluate the effect of alternative strategies for green manure management on the yield and N recovery of a subsequent spring barley crop, and their short term effects on soil structure and earthworm populations. A field trial was run from 2008 to 2011 at four sites with contrasting soils under cold climate conditions. We compared several options for on-site herbage management and the application of anaerobically digested green manure herbage. Depending on the site, removal of green manure herbage reduced the barley grain yield by 0% to 33% compared to leaving it on-site. Applying digestate, containing 45% of the N in harvested herbage, as fertilizer for barley gave the same yields as when all herbage was mulched the preceding season. Overall, the apparent N recovery was enhanced from 7% when all herbage was mulched, to 16% when returned as digestate. A positive effect on earthworm density and biomass was seen after one season of retaining mulch material, rather than removing it. Digestate did not affect the earthworm population, but contributed to higher soil aggregate stability. In conclusion, for spring barley production after green manure ley, the digestate strategy increased N recovery and reduced the risk of N losses. The yield of the succeeding barley crop yield was reduced when N in herbage was not returned as mulch or digestate

1 February 2001 in Biogeochemistry
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
AMArvin R. Mosier
Arvin R. Mosier
MBMarina Bleken
Marina Bleken
PCPornpimol Chaiwanakupt
Pornpimol Chaiwanakupt
Erle EllisErle Ellis
Erle Ellis
JFJohn R. Freney
John R. Freney
ZZZhao-Liang Zhu
Zhao-Liang Zhu

6 October 2023 in Global Change Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
JOJørgen E. Olesen
Jørgen E. Olesen
RRRobert Martin Rees
Robert Martin Rees
SRSylvie Recous
Sylvie Recous
MBMarina Bleken
Marina Bleken
DADiego Abalos
Diego Abalos
KTKairsty Topp
Kairsty Topp
Crop residues are important inputs of carbon (C) and nitrogen (N) to soils and thus directly and indirectly affect nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions. As the current inventory methodology considers N inputs by crop residues as the sole determining factor for N2O emissions, it fails to consider other underlying factors and processes. There is compelling evidence that emissions vary greatly between residues with different biochemical and physical characteristics, with the concentrations of mineralizable N and decomposable C in the residue biomass both enhancing the soil N2O production potential. High concentrations of these components are associated with immature residues (e.g., cover crops, grass, legumes, and vegetables) as opposed to mature residues (e.g., straw). A more accurate estimation of the short‐term (months) effects of the crop residues on N2O could involve distinguishing mature and immature crop residues with distinctly different emission factors. The medium‐term (years) and long‐term (decades) effects relate to the effects of residue management on soil N fertility and soil physical and chemical properties, considering that these are affected by local climatic and soil conditions as well as land use and management. More targeted mitigation efforts for N2O emissions, after addition of crop residues to the soil, are urgently needed and require an improved methodology for emission accounting. This work needs to be underpinned by research to (1) develop and validate N2O emission factors for mature and immature crop residues, (2) assess emissions from belowground residues of terminated crops, (3) improve activity data on management of different residue types, in particular immature residues, and (4) evaluate long‐term effects of residue addition on N2O emissions.

1 April 2002 in Biogeochemistry
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
AMArvin R. Mosier
Arvin R. Mosier
MBMarina Bleken
Marina Bleken
PCPornpimol Chaiwanakupt
Pornpimol Chaiwanakupt
EEErle C. Ellis
Erle C. Ellis
JFJohn R. Freney
John R. Freney
ZZZhao-Liang Zhu
Zhao-Liang Zhu