Fernanda Miranda Zoppas

Dr. Fernanda Miranda Zoppas

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

11Years (2016-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
4 September 2023 in Microplastics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Nicolàs Alejandro SaccoNicolàs Alejandro Sacco
Nicolàs Alejandro Sacco
Fernanda Miranda ZoppasFernanda Miranda Zoppas
Fernanda Miranda Zoppas
ADAlejandra Devard
Alejandra Devard
PGPilar Gonzalez-Muñoz
Pilar Gonzalez-Muñoz
GGGonzalo García
Gonzalo García
FMFernanda Albana Marchesini
Fernanda Albana Marchesini
Microplastic pollution has become a global environmental concern with detrimental effects on ecosystems and human health. Effective removal of microplastics from water sources is crucial to mitigate their impacts. Advanced oxidative processes (AOPs) have emerged as promising strategies for the degradation and elimination of microplastics. This review provides a comprehensive overview of the application of AOPs in the removal of microplastics from water. Various AOPs, such as photocatalysis, ozonation, and Fenton-like processes, have shown significant potential for microplastic degradation. These processes generate highly reactive species, such as hydroxyl radicals, which can break down microplastics into smaller fragments or even mineralize them into harmless byproducts. The efficiency of photocatalytic oxidation depends on several factors, including the choice of photocatalysts, reaction conditions, and the physicochemical properties of microplastics. Furthermore, this review discusses the challenges associated with photocatalytic oxidation, such as the need for optimization of operating parameters and the potential formation of harmful byproducts. Overall, photocatalytic oxidation offers a promising avenue for the removal of microplastics from water, contributing to the preservation of aquatic ecosystems and safeguarding human health. However, further research is needed to address the limitations and optimize the implementation of this process for effective and sustainable microplastic remediation.

26 June 2023 in Chemical Engineering Journal Advances
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Fernanda Miranda ZoppasFernanda Miranda Zoppas
Fernanda Miranda Zoppas
Nicolàs Alejandro SaccoNicolàs Alejandro Sacco
Nicolàs Alejandro Sacco
JSJesica Soffietti
Jesica Soffietti
ADAlejandra Devard
Alejandra Devard
FAFaheem Akhter
Faheem Akhter
FMFernanda Albana Marchesini
Fernanda Albana Marchesini

1 March 2016 in Engenharia Sanitaria e Ambiental
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Fernanda Miranda ZoppasFernanda Miranda Zoppas
Fernanda Miranda Zoppas
ANDREA MOURA BERNARDESANDREA MOURA BERNARDES
ANDREA MOURA BERNARDES
ÁMÁlvaro Meneguzzi
Álvaro Meneguzzi
RESUMO O nitrogênio é um dos contaminantes mais importantes presentes nas águas residuais. As alternativas tecnológicas mais usuais para o tratamento de águas contendo esse composto lançam mão do ciclo bioquímico do nitrogênio, o qual se sustenta em dois processos, a nitrificação e a desnitrificação. Dentre os parâmetros que influenciam na remoção de nitrogênio, podemos citar a concentração de oxigênio dissolvido, relação carbono/nitrogênio, temperatura, pH entre outros. Este trabalho apresenta uma revisão sobre a remoção biológica de nitrogênio das águas e os principais parâmetros que influenciam na sua remoção, dando ênfase ao processo de nitrificação e desnitrificação simultânea.

1 March 2016 in Catalysis Communications
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Fernanda Miranda ZoppasFernanda Miranda Zoppas
Fernanda Miranda Zoppas
FMF.A. Marchesini
F.A. Marchesini
ADA. Devard
A. Devard
ANDREA MOURA BERNARDESANDREA MOURA BERNARDES
ANDREA MOURA BERNARDES
EME.E. Miró
E.E. Miró

1 September 2021 in Chemosphere
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
TBThiago Favarini Beltrame
Thiago Favarini Beltrame
Fernanda Miranda ZoppasFernanda Miranda Zoppas
Fernanda Miranda Zoppas
MGMaria Carolina Gomes
Maria Carolina Gomes
JFJane Zoppas Ferreira
Jane Zoppas Ferreira
FMFernanda Albana Marchesini
Fernanda Albana Marchesini
ANDREA MOURA BERNARDESANDREA MOURA BERNARDES
ANDREA MOURA BERNARDES

4 June 2021 in Water Science & Technology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
TBT. F. Beltrame
T. F. Beltrame
Fernanda Miranda ZoppasFernanda Miranda Zoppas
Fernanda Miranda Zoppas
JFJ. Z. Ferreira
J. Z. Ferreira
FMF. A. Marchesini
F. A. Marchesini
ABA. M. Bernardes
A. M. Bernardes
This work aims to present different electroreduction and electrocatalytic processes configurations to treat nitrate contaminated water. The parameters tested were: current density, cell potential, electrode potential, pH values, cell type and catalyst use. It was found that the nitrite ion is present in all process variations used, being the resulting nitrite concentration higher in an alkaline pH. The increase in current density on galvanostatic operation mode provides a greater reduction of nitrate (64%, 1.4 mA cm−2) if compared to the potentiostatic (20%) and constant cell potential (37%) configurations. In a dual-chamber cell the nitrate reduction with current density of 1.4 mA cm−2 was tested and obtained as a NO3− reduction of 85%. The use of single chamber cell presented 32 ± 3% of nitrate reduction, indicating that in this cell type the nitrate reduction is smaller than in dual-chamber cell (64%). The presence of a Pd catalyst with 3.1% wt. decreased the nitrite (1.0 N-mg L−1) and increased the gaseous compounds (9.4 N-mg L−1) formation. The best configuration showed that, by fixing the current density, the highest nitrate reduction is obtained and the pH presents a significant influence during the tests. The use of the catalyst decreased the nitrite and enhanced the gaseous compounds formation.