Xiaopeng Meng

Dr. Xiaopeng Meng


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

5Years (2022-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
29 July 2023 in Remote Sensing
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
XMXiaopeng Meng
Xiaopeng Meng
CLChangchun Li
Changchun Li
JLJingbo Li
Jingbo Li
XLXinyan Li
Xinyan Li
FGFuchen Guo
Fuchen Guo
ZXzhen xiao
zhen xiao
Detection and counting of wheat heads are crucial for wheat yield estimation. To address the issues of overlapping and small volumes of wheat heads on complex backgrounds, this paper proposes the YOLOv7-MA model. By introducing micro-scale detection layers and the convolutional block attention module, the model enhances the target information of wheat heads and weakens the background information, thereby strengthening its ability to detect small wheat heads and improving the detection performance. Experimental results indicate that after being trained and tested on the Global Wheat Head Dataset 2021, the YOLOv7-MA model achieves a mean average precision (MAP) of 93.86% with a detection speed of 35.93 frames per second (FPS), outperforming Faster-RCNN, YOLOv5, YOLOX, and YOLOv7 models. Meanwhile, when tested under the three conditions of low illumination, blur, and occlusion, the coefficient of determination (R2) of YOLOv7-MA is respectively 0.9895, 0.9872, and 0.9882, and the correlation between the predicted wheat head number and the manual counting result is stronger than others. In addition, when the YOLOv7-MA model is transferred to field-collected wheat head datasets, it maintains high performance with MAP in maturity and filling stages of 93.33% and 93.03%, respectively, and R2 values of 0.9632 and 0.9155, respectively, demonstrating better performance in the maturity stage. Overall, YOLOv7-MA has achieved accurate identification and counting of wheat heads in complex field backgrounds. In the future, its application with unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) can provide technical support for large-scale wheat yield estimation in the field.

6 May 2023 in Agriculture
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CLChangchun Li
Changchun Li
XLXinyan Li
Xinyan Li
XMXiaopeng Meng
Xiaopeng Meng
ZXzhen xiao
zhen xiao
XWXiFang Wu
XiFang Wu
CYChen Yang
Chen Yang
Nitrogen content is a crucial index for crop growth diagnosis and the exact estimation of nitrogen content is of great significance for grasping crop growth status in real-time. This paper takes winter wheat as the study object and the precision agriculture demonstration area of the Jiaozuo Academy of Agricultural and Forestry Sciences in Henan Province as the research area. The hyperspectral reflectance data of the wheat canopy in different growth periods are obtained with the ASD ground object hyperspectral instrument, and the original canopy spectral data are preprocessed by fractional differential and continuous wavelet transform; then, the vegetation indices are established, correlation analysis with nitrogen content is conducted, and the fractional differential spectra are selected; finally, based on the wavelet energy coefficient and the vegetation indices with strong correlations, the methods of support vector machine (SVM), ridge regression, stepwise regression, Gaussian process regression (GPR), and the BP neural network are used to construct the estimation model for nitrogen content in wheat at different growth stages. By adopting the R2 and root mean square error (RMSE) indices, the best nitrogen content estimation model at every growth stage is selected. The overall analysis of the nitrogen content estimation effect indicated that for the four growth periods, the maximum modeling and validation R2 of the nitrogen content estimation models of the SVM, ridge regression, stepwise regression, GPR, and BP neural network models reached 0.95 and 0.93, the average reached 0.76 and 0.71, and the overall estimation effect was good. The average values of the modeling and validation R2 of the nitrogen content estimation model at the flag picking stage were 0.85 and 0.81, respectively, which were 37.10% and 44.64%, 1.19% and 3.85%, and 14.86% and 17.39% higher than those at the jointing stage, flowering stage, and filling stage, respectively. Therefore, the model of the flag picking stage has higher estimation accuracy and a better estimation effect on the nitrogen content. For the different growth stages, the optimal estimation models of nitrogen content were different. Among them, continuous wavelet transform combined with the BP neural network model can be the most effective method for estimating the N content in wheat at the flagging stage. The paper provides an effective method for estimating the nitrogen content in wheat and a new idea for crop growth monitoring.

23 December 2022 in Agronomy
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CLChangchun Li
Changchun Li
ZXzhen xiao
zhen xiao
YLYanghua Liu
Yanghua Liu
XMXiaopeng Meng
Xiaopeng Meng
XLXinyan Li
Xinyan Li
ZXzhen xiao
zhen xiao
Leaf water content (LWC) is one of the important indicators of crop health. It plays an important role in the physiological process of leaves, participates in almost all physiological processes of crops, and is of great significance to the survival and growth of crops. Based on the hyperspectral (350–1350 nm) and LWC data (jointing, booting, flowering, and filling periods) of winter wheat in 2020 and 2021, this work proposed to transform and process the hyperspectral data by adopting fractional order differential and continuous wavelet transform, and took a differential spectrum, wavelet coefficients, and mixed variables (differential spectrum and wavelet coefficients) as input variables of the model and adopted Gaussian process regression (GPR), classification and regression decision tree (CART), and artificial neural network (ANN) methods to estimate the LWC of wheat in different growth periods. The results indicated that fractional differential and continuous wavelet transform could highlight the spectral characteristics of winter wheat canopy and improve its correlation with LWC. The three model variables had the best estimation effect on LWC in the flowering period, and the average values of R2 were 0.86 and 0.87 in modeling and verification, which indicated that the flowering period could be used as the best estimation period for LWC. Compared with the differential spectrum and wavelet coefficients, LWC estimation based on mixed variables performed best. The average values of R2 in modeling and verification were 0.78 and 0.79. Among them, the ANN model had the highest estimation accuracy, and the R2 in modeling and verification could reach 0.92 and 0.91. This showed that fractional differential and continuous wavelet transform could effectively promote the sensitivity of spectral information to LWC and enhance the prediction ability and stability of wheat LWC. The outcomes of the present study have the potential to provide new ideas for the water monitoring of crops.