Andrew John Simkin

Dr. Andrew John Simkin

Life Sciences, University of Essex, Colchester, Essex, UK
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

27Years (2000-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
22 January 2022 in Photosynthesis Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Andrew John SimkinAndrew John Simkin
Andrew John Simkin
LKLeepica Kapoor
Leepica Kapoor
George Priya Doss C.George Priya Doss C.
George Priya Doss C.
THTanja A. Hofmann
Tanja A. Hofmann
TLTracy Lawson
Tracy Lawson
SRSiva Ramamoorthy
Siva Ramamoorthy

1 February 2019 in Journal of Experimental Botany
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Andrew John SimkinAndrew John Simkin
Andrew John Simkin
PLPatricia E López-Calcagno
Patricia E López-Calcagno
CRChristine A Raines
Christine A Raines
A number of recent studies have provided strong support demonstrating that improving the photosynthetic processes through genetic engineering can provide an avenue to improve yield potential. The major focus of this review is on improvement of the Calvin–Benson cycle and electron transport. Consideration is also given to how altering regulatory process may provide an additional route to increase photosynthetic efficiency. Here we summarize some of the recent successes that have been observed through genetic manipulation of photosynthesis, showing that, in both the glasshouse and the field, yield can be increased by >40%. These results provide a clear demonstration of the potential for increasing yield through improvements in photosynthesis. In the final section, we consider the need to stack improvement in photosynthetic traits with traits that target the yield gap in order to provide robust germplasm for different crops across the globe.

6 December 2004 in The Plant Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Andrew John SimkinAndrew John Simkin
Andrew John Simkin
SSSteven H. Schwartz
Steven H. Schwartz
MAMichele Auldridge
Michele Auldridge
MTMark G. Taylor
Mark G. Taylor
HKHarry J. Klee
Harry J. Klee
Summary: Volatile terpenoid compounds, potentially derived from carotenoids, are important components of flavor and aroma in many fruits, vegetables and ornamentals. Despite their importance, little is known about the enzymes that generate these volatiles. The tomato genome contains two closely related genes potentially encoding carotenoid cleavage dioxygenases, LeCCD1A and LeCCD1B. A quantitative reverse transcriptase‐polymerase chain reaction analysis revealed that one of these two genes, LeCCD1B, is highly expressed in ripening fruit (4 days post‐breaker), where it constitutes 0.11% of total RNA. Unlike the related neoxanthin cleavage dioxygenases, import assays using pea chloroplasts showed that the LeCCD1 proteins are not plastid‐localized. The biochemical functions of the LeCCD1 proteins were determined by bacterial expression and in vitro assays, where it was shown that they symmetrically cleave multiple carotenoid substrates at the 9,10 (9′,10′) positions to produce a C14 dialdehyde and two C13 cyclohexones that vary depending on the substrate. The potential roles of the LeCCD1 genes in vivo were assessed in transgenic tomato plants constitutively expressing the LeCCD1B gene in reverse orientation. This over‐expression of the antisense transcript led to 87–93% reductions in mRNA levels of both LeCCD1A and LeCCD1B in the leaves and fruits of selected lines. Transgenic plants exhibited no obvious morphological alterations. High‐performance liquid chromatography analysis showed no significant modification in the carotenoid content of fruit tissue. However, volatile analysis showed a ≥50% decrease in β‐ionone (a β‐carotene‐derived C13 cyclohexone) and a ≥60% decrease in geranylacetone (a C13 acyclic product likely derived from a lycopene precursor) in selected lines, implicating the LeCCD1 genes in the formation of these important flavor volatiles in vivo.

10 February 2005 in The Plant Cell
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
KSKimberley C. Snowden
Kimberley C. Snowden
Andrew John SimkinAndrew John Simkin
Andrew John Simkin
BJBart J. Janssen
Bart J. Janssen
KTKerry R. Templeton
Kerry R. Templeton
HLHolly M. Loucas
Holly M. Loucas
HKHarry J. Klee
Harry J. Klee
Carotenoids and carotenoid cleavage products play an important and integral role in plant development. The Decreased apical dominance1 (Dad1)/PhCCD8 gene of petunia (Petunia hybrida) encodes a hypothetical carotenoid cleavage dioxygenase (CCD) and ortholog of the MORE AXILLARY GROWTH4 (MAX4)/AtCCD8 gene. The dad1-1 mutant allele was inactivated by insertion of an unusual transposon (Dad-one transposon), and the dad1-3 allele is a revertant allele of dad1-1. Consistent with its role in producing a graft-transmissible compound that can alter branching, the Dad1/PhCCD8 gene is expressed in root and shoot tissue. This expression is upregulated in the stems of the dad1-1, dad2, and dad3 increased branching mutants, indicating feedback regulation of the gene in this tissue. However, this feedback regulation does not affect the root expression of Dad1/PhCCD8. Overexpression of Dad1/PhCCD8 in the dad1-1 mutant complemented the mutant phenotype, and RNA interference in the wild type resulted in an increased branching phenotype. Other differences in phenotype associated with the loss of Dad1/PhCCD8 function included altered timing of axillary meristem development, delayed leaf senescence, smaller flowers, reduced internode length, and reduced root growth. These data indicate that the substrate(s) and/or product(s) of the Dad1/PhCCD8 enzyme are mobile signal molecules with diverse roles in plant development.

9 February 2017 in Plant Physiology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SVSilvere Vialet-Chabrand
Silvere Vialet-Chabrand
JMJack S.A. Matthews
Jack S.A. Matthews
Andrew John SimkinAndrew John Simkin
Andrew John Simkin
CRChristine A Raines
Christine A Raines
TLTracy Lawson
Tracy Lawson
Fluctuating light influences acclimation in Arabidopsis independently of light intensity.

11 January 2022 in BMC Plant Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LKLeepica Kapoor
Leepica Kapoor
Andrew John SimkinAndrew John Simkin
Andrew John Simkin
George Priya Doss C.George Priya Doss C.
George Priya Doss C.
SRSiva Ramamoorthy
Siva Ramamoorthy
Background: Fruits are vital food resources as they are loaded with bioactive compounds varying with different stages of ripening. As the fruit ripens, a dynamic color change is observed from green to yellow to red due to the biosynthesis of pigments like chlorophyll, carotenoids, and anthocyanins. Apart from making the fruit attractive and being a visual indicator of the ripening status, pigments add value to a ripened fruit by making them a source of nutraceuticals and industrial products. As the fruit matures, it undergoes biochemical changes which alter the pigment composition of fruits. Results: The synthesis, degradation and retention pathways of fruit pigments are mediated by hormonal, genetic, and environmental factors. Manipulation of the underlying regulatory mechanisms during fruit ripening suggests ways to enhance the desired pigments in fruits by biotechnological interventions. Here we report, in-depth insight into the dynamics of a pigment change in ripening and the regulatory mechanisms in action. Conclusions: This review emphasizes the role of pigments as an asset to a ripened fruit as they augment the nutritive value, antioxidant levels and the net carbon gain of fruits; pigments are a source for fruit biofortification have tremendous industrial value along with being a tool to predict the harvest. This report will be of great utility to the harvesters, traders, consumers, and natural product divisions to extract the leading nutraceutical and industrial potential of preferred pigments biosynthesized at different fruit ripening stages.