Kimberlé Crenshaw, a leader in Black feminist legal theory, …

Background: In 2007, an Expert Committee recommended that dietary patterns be assessed at each wellness visit and that counseling on diet and nutrition be provided to all children. Few studies have examined the “uptake” of obesity prevention practices into pediatric primary care. This study aimed to describe patterns of nutrition counseling among children at wellness visits in South Carolina between 2008 and 2017 and determine whether sociodemographic disparities existed. Methods: The sample included 123,864 children 2–18 years of age who had a wellness visit at one of South Carolina's four major health care systems between January 1, 2008, and December 31, 2017. Documentation of nutrition counseling was defined by the International Classification of Diseases (ICD)-9/10 codes. A matched sample design and conditional logistic regression were used to examine sociodemographic disparities in children who did and did not receive nutrition counseling. Results: Nutrition counseling was documented at 3.55% of wellness visits. Significant sociodemographic disparities were found, including that African American and Hispanic children were less likely to receive counseling than white or non-Hispanic children. Differences were also found by urban/rural residence, health insurance, and BMI. Despite guidelines, ICD 9/10 code indicating diagnosis of overweight or obesity was documented for only 12.2% of children. Conclusions: Nutrition counseling was rarely documented in a large sample of electronic medical record (EMR) data from pediatric wellness visits in South Carolina—a state heavily burdened by childhood obesity. Children's BMIs were infrequently recorded, which may be a barrier to tracking BMI over time. Sociodemographic and geographic differences in nutrition counseling may exacerbate disparities in childhood obesity.

Background: One in four South Carolinians lives in a county along a nearly 200-mile stretch of Interstate 95 (I-95). Stretching from North Carolina to Georgia, this region is among the most rural, economically depressed, and racially/ethnically diverse in the state. Research is needed to identify social factors contributing to adverse health outcomes along the I-95 corridor, guide interventions, and establish a baseline for measuring progress. This study assessed social determinants of health in counties in South Carolina’s I-95 corridor relative to the rest of the state. Method: Data for South Carolina’s 46 counties were extracted from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Minority Health Social Vulnerability Index (SVI), which grouped 34 census variables into six themes: socioeconomic status, household composition and disability, minority status and language, housing type and transportation, health care infrastructure, and medical vulnerability. Each theme was ranked from 0 (least vulnerable) to 1 (most vulnerable). Measures between regions were compared using the Wilcoxon–Mann–Whitney test. Results: Compared with counties outside the I-95 corridor (n = 29), counties in the corridor (n = 17) scored higher on socioeconomic status vulnerability (.67 and .82, respectively) and medical vulnerability (.65 and .79, respectively). No statistically significant differences were found across other themes. Conclusion: Identifying social determinants of health in South Carolina’s I-95 corridor is a crucial first step toward alleviating health disparities in this region. Interventions and policies should be developed in collaboration with local stakeholders to address distal social factors that create and reinforce health disparities.

Writing well is an important skill for graduate students to learn. We contend that viewing the writing process through the lens of storytelling and narrative helps graduate students make clearer, more compelling cases in their academic writing. Mapping the movements of the classic narrative arc onto the Introduction, Methods, Results, and Discussion (IMRAD) format of health promotion writing can help authors engage in the writing process more thoroughly because we are socially trained to organize information in narrative forms. This commentary examines the narrative framework in relation to writing, reading, and synthesizing academic literature. We conclude that graduate students will benefit from seeing themselves as health promotion storytellers.