This comprehensive review explores the genetic contributions to endometriosis and their potential impact on improving diagnostic techniques. The review begins by defining endometriosis and discussing its prevalence, emphasizing the need for a deeper understanding of the genetic basis of the condition. It highlights recent genome-wide association studies (GWAS) that have identified specific genetic variants associated with endometriosis, shedding light on the molecular pathways and mechanisms involved. The review addresses genetic heterogeneity across different populations and ethnicities, emphasizing the importance of considering population-specific markers in diagnostic approaches. It explores the diagnostic implications of genetic insights, including the potential use of genetic markers for precise and early detection, as well as risk prediction. The review also delves into the integration of genetic information with clinical parameters and imaging findings, and the exploration of multi-omics approaches for a comprehensive understanding of endometriosis. It discusses recent studies on genetic and epigenetic biomarkers, their potential as diagnostic tools, and the need for validation in independent cohorts. The review highlights the impact of new genomic technologies, such as next-generation sequencing, in improving diagnostic accuracy and personalized management. It identifies the challenges and future directions in translating genetic findings into diagnostic tools and emphasizes the transformative potential of genetic insights in endometriosis diagnosis. This review provides a roadmap for future research and underscores the significance of genetic insights in improving diagnostic precision and personalized care for individuals with endometriosis.

Gastric cancer (GC) ranks as the fifth most prevalent malignant neoplasm globally, with an increased death rate despite recent advancements in research and therapeutic options. Different molecular subtypes of GC have distinct interactions with the immune system, impacting the tumor microenvironment (TME), prognosis, and reaction to immunotherapy. Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) in the TME are crucial for preventing tumor growth and metastasis, as evidenced by research showing that patients with GC who have a significant density of TILs have better survival rates. But cancer cells have evolved a variety of mechanisms to evade immune surveillance, both sialic acid-binding immunoglobulin-like lectin 15 (Siglec-15) and Programmed Death-Ligand 1 (PD-L1) playing a pivotal role in the development of an immunosuppressive TME. They prevent T cell activation and proliferation resulting in a decrease in the immune system’s capacity to recognize and eliminate malignant cells. These immune checkpoint molecules function via different but complementary mechanisms, the expression of Siglec-15 being mutually exclusive with PD-L1 and, therefore, providing a different therapeutic approach. The review explores how TILs affect tumor growth and patient outcomes in GC, with particular emphasis on their interactions within the TME and potential targeting of the PD-L1 and Siglec-15 pathways for immunotherapy.

Gastric cancer (GC) ranks as the fifth most prevalent malignant neoplasm globally, with an increased death rate despite recent advancements in research and therapeutic options. Different molecular subtypes of GC have distinct interactions with the immune system, impacting the tumor microenvironment (TME), prognosis, and reaction to immunotherapy. Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) in the TME are crucial for preventing tumor growth and metastasis, as evidenced by research showing that patients with GC who have a significant density of TILs have better survival rates. But cancer cells have evolved a variety of mechanisms to evade immune surveillance, both sialic acid-binding immunoglobulin-like lectin 15 (Siglec-15) and Programmed Death-Ligand 1 (PD-L1) playing a pivotal role in the development of an immunosuppressive TME. They prevent T cell activation and proliferation resulting in a decrease in the immune system’s capacity to recognize and eliminate malignant cells. These immune checkpoint molecules function via different but complementary mechanisms, the expression of Siglec-15 being mutually exclusive with PD-L1 and, therefore, providing a different therapeutic approach. The review explores how TILs affect tumor growth and patient outcomes in GC, with particular emphasis on their interactions within the TME and potential targeting of the PD-L1 and Siglec-15 pathways for immunotherapy.

Gastric cancer remains a major global health burden, with limited response rates to current immunotherapies targeting the programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-1/PD-L1) axis. Recent studies have identified sialic acid-binding immunoglobulin-like lectin 15 (SIGLEC-15) as a novel immune checkpoint molecule that may drive immune evasion through PD-L1–independent pathways. This study aimed to evaluate the expression patterns of SIGLEC-15 and PD-L1 in gastric adenocarcinoma and to investigate their associations with clinicopathological features and patient outcomes. We retrospectively analyzed 133 consecutive cases of gastric adenocarcinoma with complete clinicopathologic and follow-up data. Immunohistochemical staining was performed on formalin-fixed tumor samples; SIGLEC-15 expression on tumor cells was quantified by H-score (high expression defined as ≥110) and PD-L1 status by combined positive score (CPS, positive if ≥1). High SIGLEC-15 expression correlated with multiple adverse pathological features, including lymphatic (p = 0.003), venous (p = 0.030), and perineural invasion (p = 0.010), and was associated with significantly poorer 3-year overall survival (hazard ratio = 3.36, p < 0.001). While SIGLEC-15 and PD-L1 expression were not mutually exclusive, an inverse relationship was generally observed. Patients with dual positivity (SIGLEC-15 high/PD-L1 CPS ≥ 1) showed the lowest 36-month survival (32%), compared to 56% in the dual-negative group (SIGLEC-15 low/PD-L1 CPS < 1). These results highlight the clinical relevance of SIGLEC-15 as an independent marker of tumor aggressiveness and poor prognosis in gastric adenocarcinoma. Moreover, stratification based on combined SIGLEC-15 and PD-L1 CPS expression revealed that patients co-expressing high levels of both markers experienced the poorest survival outcomes. These findings suggest that the dual assessment of SIGLEC-15 and PD-L1 may enhance prognostic accuracy and support immunotherapeutic decision-making in gastric cancer.

Background and Objectives: Cardiac transplantation is currently the elective treatment choice in end-stage heart failure, and cellular rejection is a predictive factor for morbidity and mortality after surgery. We proposed an evaluation of the clinicopathologic factors involved in the mechanism of rejection. Materials and Methods: This study included 146 patients who underwent transplantation at the Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases and Transplantation in Targu Mures between 2010 and 2023, and we evaluated the function and structure of the myocardium after surgery by using endomyocardial biopsy. Results: Overall, 120 men and 26 women underwent transplantation, with an approximately equal proportion under and over 40 years old (48.6% and 51.4%). Evaluating the degree of acute cellular rejection according to the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation classification showed that most of the patients presented with acute cellular rejection (ACR) and antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) grade 0, and most cases of ACR and AMR were reported with mild changes (13% or 10.3% patients). Therefore, the most frequent histopathologic diagnoses were similar to lesions unrelated to rejection (45.2% of patients) and ischemia–reperfusion lesions (25.3% patients), respectively. Conclusions: Although 82.2% of the transplanted cases showed no rejection (ISHLT score 0), non-rejection-related lesion-like changes were present in 45.2% of cases, and because more of the non-rejection-related criteria could be detected, it may be necessary to adjust the grading of the rejection criteria. The histopathologic changes that characterize rejection are primarily represented by the mononuclear inflammatory infiltrate; in our study, inflammatory changes were mostly mild (71.9%), with myocyte involvement in all cases. These changes are associated with and contribute to the maintenance of the rejection phenomenon.

Background and Objectives: Gastric cancer (GC) remains a significant global health challenge with a poor prognosis. This study aimed to evaluate the association between Klintrup–Mäkinen (KM) inflammatory infiltrate grading and clinicopathological features in gastric cancer patients, investigating its potential as a prognostic marker. Material and Methods: This retrospective study analyzed 133 gastric adenocarcinoma patients diagnosed between 2020 and 2021 at County Clinical Hospital in Târgu Mureș, Romania. Patients were divided into two groups based on KM grades: low (grades 0–1, n = 62) and high (grades 2–3, n = 71). Clinicopathological characteristics and survival outcomes were compared between the groups. Results: Demographic characteristics were similar between the groups. Patients with low KM grades demonstrated significantly more aggressive tumor features, including a higher prevalence of Borrmann classification types III-IV (75.8% vs. 54.9%, p = 0.01), poorly differentiated histology (74.1% vs. 33.8%, p < 0.0001), advanced T stage (93.5% vs. 80.2%, p = 0.04), and lymph node involvement (87% vs. 60.5%, p = 0.0008). This group also exhibited higher rates of lymphatic invasion (79% vs. 50.7%, p = 0.001), venous invasion (51.6% vs. 30.9%, p = 0.02), perineural invasion (50% vs. 22.5%, p = 0.001), and positive surgical margins (32.2% vs. 15.4%, p = 0.02). Survival analysis revealed a hazard ratio of 1.642 (95% CI: 1.02–2.62) for patients with low KM grades compared to those with high KM grades. Conclusions: Low KM grades are associated with more aggressive tumor characteristics and poorer prognosis in GC patients. The KM score may serve as a valuable, cost-effective histological marker for assessing tumor aggressiveness and could aid in risk stratification when applied to routine H&E-stained slides. While it does not replace immunohistochemical or molecular analyses, integrating the KM score into pathological assessment may enhance prognostic accuracy and support identifying patients who might benefit from immunotherapy.