Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. Surgical management, including hepatic resection, liver transplantation, and ablation, offers the greatest potential for a curative approach. This review aims to discuss recent advancements in HCC surgery and identify unresolved issues in the field. Treatment selection relies on the BCLC staging system, with surgical therapies primarily recommended for early-stage disease. Recent studies have shown that patients previously considered unresectable, such as those with portal vein tumor thrombus and uncomplicated portal hypertension, may benefit from hepatic resection. Minimally invasive surgery and improved visualization techniques are also explored, alongside new techniques for optimizing future liver remnant, ex vivo resection, and advancements in hemorrhage control. Liver transplantation criteria, particularly the long-standing Milan criteria, are critically examined. Alternative criteria proposed and tested in specific regions are presented. In the context of organ shortage, bridging therapy plays a critical role in preventing tumor progression and maintaining patients eligible for transplantation. Lastly, we explore emerging ablation modalities, comparing them with the current standard, radiofrequency ablation. In conclusion, this comprehensive review provides insights into recent trends and future prospects in the surgical management of HCC, highlighting areas that require further investigation.

Background. To investigate the impact of intrapatient variability (IPV) in the levels of immunosuppressant drugs on health outcomes after liver transplantation. Methods. A comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted, examining literature from MEDLINE/PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Reviews, and Cochrane CENTRAL. Results. The analysis focused on acute rejection, graft survival, acute kidney injury, and cancer risk as health outcomes. Of 2901 articles screened, 10 met the inclusion criteria. The results indicate a 19% reduction in the risk of acute rejection in patients with lower IPV (RR = 0.81; 95% confidence interval, 0.66-0.99), although 6 studies found no significant association between high IPV and acute rejection. Contrasting results were observed for graft survival, with 1 study indicating worse outcomes for high IPV, whereas another reported no significant difference. High IPV was consistently associated with acute kidney injury across 3 studies. One study suggested a link between high IPV and hepatocellular carcinoma, although a meta-analysis for these outcomes was not feasible. Conclusions. These findings point to a marginal but statistically significant association between high IPV and an increased risk of acute rejection, highlighting the importance of precise management of immunosuppressive drugs in liver transplant recipients to enhance patient outcomes. Export