Background: Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy (CAR T-cell therapy) is associated with potentially life-threatening toxicities, most commonly cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune-effector-cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS). These frequent adverse events are managed with the IL-6 receptor antagonist tocilizumab and/or corticosteroids. The prophylactic and early use of corticosteroids for CRS and ICANS have previously been reported, but eventual negative impacts on CAR T-cell efficacy are feared. Methods: Retrospective comparative analysis of two patient cohorts with hematological malignancies treated with CAR T-cell therapy: 43 patients received early administration of 10 mg dexamethasone preceding each dose of tocilizumab (“early corticosteroid/ tocilizumab”, EcsTcz cohort) vs. 40 patients who received tocilizumab alone (“tocilizumab alone”, Tcz cohort) for treatment of low-grade CRS. Results: Despite overall higher CRS incidence (91% vs. 70%; p = 0.0249), no high-grade CRS was observed (0% vs. 10%; p = 0.0497) among patients receiving early corticosteroids in combination with tocilizumab. In terms of neurotoxicity, no worsening regarding incidence of ICANS (30% vs. 33%; p = 0.8177) or high-grade ICANS (20% vs. 14%; p = 0.5624) was observed in the EcsTcz cohort. Moreover, overall response rates (80% vs. 77%; p = 0.7936), complete response rates (50% vs. 44%; p = 0.6628), progression-free survival (p = 0.6345) and overall survival (p = 0.1215) were comparable for both cohorts. Conclusions: Our study suggests that the early use of corticosteroids in combination with the standard tocilizumab schedule for low-grade CRS following CAR T-cell therapy may significantly reduce the risk of high-grade CRS without negative impact on neurotoxicity or treatment outcome.

(1) Background: CAR-T-cell therapy is a novel therapeutic option for patients with relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (r/r DLBCL). The parameters that predict a favorable outcome after CAR-T-cell treatment are a matter of ongoing exploration. (2) Methods: We analyzed 36 consecutive patients with r/r DLBCL receiving tisagenlecleucel or axicabtagene ciloleucel at a single academic institution. We hypothesized that lymphoma subtypes (transformed versus de novo DLBCL) are of prognostic importance. We also assessed age, previous treatment, bridging therapy, remission status at the time of CAR-T treatment and at six months, LDH, the occurrence of CRS or ICANS, and CAR-T-DNA ddPCR kinetics for their prognostic impact. (3) Results: CRS was observed in 24 (67%) patients, and ICANS was observed in 14 (39%) patients. CR was achieved in 20 (56%) patients. Achievement of CR within six months after CAR-T was associated with better PFS (p < 0.0001) and OS (p < 0.0001). Remarkably, transformed (=secondary) lymphoma was associated with a better outcome than de novo disease for PFS (p = 0.0093) and OS (p = 0.0209), and the CR rate was 78% versus 33% (p = 0.0176). Mortality in patients with transformed DLBCL was 23% compared with 56% in de novo patients (p = 0.0209). (4) Conclusion: The presence of transformed DLBCL seems to be associated with a more favorable course after CAR-T treatment than that observed in the de novo DLBCL patients.

(1) Background: The combination of venetoclax and hypomethylating agents (HMAs) is a standard first-line regimen for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients unfit for intensive chemotherapy. Since venetoclax-HMAs are usually administered until progression and delayed hematologic recovery is one of the limiting toxicities, cyclic administration including 7–14-day breaks is recommended. However, whether longer venetoclax schedules lead to higher response rates and how venetoclax pharmacokinetics correlate with toxicity and efficacy remains unclarified. In this single-center retrospective study, we analyzed how venetoclax plasma levels and treatment duration impact hematologic toxicity and treatment responses. (2) Methods: We analyzed the safety and efficacy of venetoclax-HMA combination regimens in a cohort of AML patients unfit for intensive chemotherapy treated at our institution between June 2020 and September 2023. The primary endpoint was the correlation between venetoclax plasma levels or administration schedule with hematologic recovery after the first cycle. Secondary endpoints included the following clinical outcomes: correlation with complete response (CR) status, progression-free survival, and overall survival. (3) Results: Within our cohort of 75 AML patients, we found no correlation between venetoclax plasma peak and trough levels, or venetoclax treatment duration (≤ or >14 days), and hematologic toxicity. Patients receiving shorter venetoclax schedules (≤14 days) had similar CR rates compared to patients treated with longer schedules. (4) Conclusions: Our results suggest that shorter (≤14 days) venetoclax schedules may have no negative impact on tumor responses in AML patients receiving venetoclax and HMA combinations. However, prospective validation studies would be required to confirm these findings.

Background: Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a challenging disease due to its aggressive nature and interindividual variability in treatment response. While sex differences in AML incidence and outcomes have been reported, the impact of sex on treatment-related toxicity remains underexplored. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed patients who received intensive chemotherapy for de novo or secondary AML at a single academic hospital between 1 January 2017 and 30 November 2021. A total of 65 patients (62% males) were included, with similar risk categories across sexes. Results: Although adverse event rates were similar, females had significantly higher rates of neutropenic colitis (100% vs. 80%, p = 0.019) after the first induction cycle. Hematological recovery after the second cycle was faster in males for neutrophils (21 vs. 28 days, p = 0.025) and thrombocytes (27 vs. 37 days, p = 0.02). Hospitalization duration was also significantly longer for females (26 days vs. 24 days, p = 0.039). The median overall survival did not differ by sex, but was significantly longer for those receiving two cycles vs. one cycle (0.5 years vs. NR) and for those <60 years old (6.1 vs. 1.0 years). Conclusions: These findings suggest sex-related differences in treatment toxicity and hospital stay length. Larger studies are needed to better understand the impact of sex on AML outcomes.

Background/Objectives: CAR-T-cell therapy has become a key treatment for relapsed or refractory hematologic malignancies such as diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (r/r DLBCL), although patient outcomes differ considerably. The intestinal microbiome has been proposed as an important factor influencing CAR-T-cell therapy efficacy; accordingly, antibiotic exposure, which may induce dysbiosis, has been associated with inferior outcomes after CAR-T-cell therapy. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed clinical data from 140 patients to assess the impact of infection-related antibiotic therapy prior to CAR-T-cell therapy, stratifying them into two cohorts: 67 patients with previous antibiotic exposure and 73 without exposure. Results: Patients exposed to antibiotics prior to CAR-T therapy had significantly reduced progression-free survival (p = 0.016) and overall survival (p = 0.002) compared to those without exposure. Multiple antibiotic courses and shorter intervals between the last antibiotic treatment and CAR-T-cell therapy were linked to poorer outcomes. Conclusions: Our data suggest that pre-CAR-T-cell-therapy antibiotic exposure is associated with inferior outcomes, although it remains unclear whether this effect is causal or reflects underlying patient comorbidities. These findings highlight the need for further studies investigating the role of antibiotic-induced dysbiosis on CAR-T-cell therapy efficacy.

Gemtuzumab ozogamicin (GO), a CD33-targeting antibody drug conjugate, previously showed longer relapse-free survival when combined with induction chemotherapy in patients with favorable-risk acute myeloid leukemia (AML). In this patient population, characterized by lower relapse risk as compared to other ELN risk groups, autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) can be used as consolidation strategy. However, there are limited data on the impact of GO on the peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) mobilization potential. We therefore retrospectively analyzed data from 54 AML patients with favorable-risk AML treated with (n = 17) or without (n = 37) GO during induction treatment. We observed no significant differences in the PBSC mobilization rate between patients treated with vs. without GO. The mobilization success in a first attempt directly following cycle 2 was 65% vs. 70% (p = 0.92); and the mobilization success in a subsequent second attempt after hematologic recovery and repeated stimulation procedure was 24% vs. 19% (p = 0.56). No significant impact on treatment outcome in terms of EFS (p = 0.31) or OS (p = 0.99) was observed. Thus, our results suggest that the addition of GO to induction regimens does not negatively impact PBSC mobilization in favorable-risk AML patients. To our best knowledge, this is the first study comparing the stem cell mobilization potential in favorable-risk AML patients treated with vs. without GO.