Jean-Luc Velay

Dr. Jean-Luc Velay

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

22Years (2005-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 July 2019 in Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MBMaëlle Biotteau
Maëlle Biotteau
JDJeremy Danna
Jeremy Danna
EBEloïse Baudou
Eloïse Baudou
FPFrédéric Puyjarinet
Frédéric Puyjarinet
JVJean-Luc Velay
Jean-Luc Velay
YCYves Chaix
Yves Chaix
Developmental coordination disorder (DCD) is a common and well-recognized neurodevelopmental disorder affecting approximately 5 in every 100 individuals worldwide. It has long been included in standard national and international classifications of disorders (especially the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders). Children and adults with DCD may come to medical or paramedical attention because of poor motor skills, poor motor coordination, and/or impaired procedural learning affecting activities of daily living. Studies show DCD persistence of 30–70% in adulthood for individuals who were diagnosed with DCD as children, with direct consequences in the academic realm and even beyond. In particular, individuals with DCD are at increased risk of impaired handwriting skills. Medium-term and long-term prognosis depends on the timing of the diagnosis, (possible) comorbid disorders (and their diagnosis), the variability of signs and symptoms (number and intensity), and the nature and frequency of the interventions individuals receive. We therefore chose to investigate the signs and symptoms, diagnosis, and rehabilitation of both DCD and developmental dysgraphia, which continues to receive far too little attention in its own right from researchers and clinicians.

15 February 2019 in Frontiers in Psychology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
AMAnne Mangen
Anne Mangen
GOGérard Olivier
Gérard Olivier
JVJean-Luc Velay
Jean-Luc Velay
Digital reading devices such as Kindle differ from paper books with respect to the kinesthetic and tactile feedback provided to the reader, but the role of these features in reading is rarely studied empirically. This experiment compares reading of a long text on Kindle DX and in print. Fifty participants (24 years old) read a 28 page (∼1 h reading time) long mystery story on Kindle or in a print pocket book and completed several tests measuring various levels of reading comprehension: engagement, recall, capacities to locate events in the text and reconstructing the plot of the story. Results showed that on most tests subjects performed identically whatever the reading medium. However, on measures related to chronology and temporality, those who had read in the print pocket book, performed better than those who had read on a Kindle. It is concluded that, basically comprehension was similar with both media, but, because kinesthetic feedback is less informative with a Kindle, readers were not as efficient to locate events in the space of the text and hence in the temporality of the story. We suggest that, to get a correct spatial representation of the text and consequently a coherent temporal organization of the story, readers would be reliant on the sensorimotor cues which are afforded by the manipulation of the book.


1 February 2014 in Human Movement Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
VPVietminh Paz-Villagrán
Vietminh Paz-Villagrán
JDJérémy Danna
Jérémy Danna
JVJean-Luc Velay
Jean-Luc Velay

1 April 2019 in Cortex
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SPSarah Palmis
Sarah Palmis
JVJean-Luc Velay
Jean-Luc Velay
EFElie Fabiani
Elie Fabiani
BNBruno Nazarian
Bruno Nazarian
JAJean-Luc Anton
Jean-Luc Anton
MLMarieke Longcamp
Marieke Longcamp

21 April 2019 in Brain Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
AFAline FREY
Aline FREY
CFClément François
Clément François
JCJulie Chobert
Julie Chobert
JVJean-Luc Velay
Jean-Luc Velay
MHMichel Habib
Michel Habib
MBMireille Besson
Mireille Besson
Previous results showed a positive influence of music training on linguistic abilities at both attentive and preattentive levels. Here, we investigate whether six months of active music training is more efficient than painting training to improve the preattentive processing of phonological parameters based on durations that are often impaired in children with developmental dyslexia (DD). Results were also compared to a control group of Typically Developing (TD) children matched on reading age. We used a Test–Training–Retest procedure and analysed the Mismatch Negativity (MMN) and the N1 and N250 components of the Event-Related Potentials to syllables that differed in Voice Onset Time (VOT), vowel duration, and vowel frequency. Results were clear-cut in showing a normalization of the preattentive processing of VOT in children with DD after music training but not after painting training. They also revealed increased N250 amplitude to duration deviant stimuli in children with DD after music but not painting training, and no training effect on the preattentive processing of frequency. These findings are discussed in view of recent theories of dyslexia pointing to deficits in processing the temporal structure of speech. They clearly encourage the use of active music training for the rehabilitation of children with language impairments.