Breast cancer progression, treatment resistance, and relapse are thought to originate from a small population of tumor cells, breast cancer stem cells (BCSCs). Identification of factors critical for BCSC function is therefore vital for the development of therapies. Here, we identify the arginine methyltransferase PRMT5 as a key in vitro and in vivo regulator of BCSC proliferation and self-renewal and establish FOXP1, a winged helix/forkhead transcription factor, as a critical effector of PRMT5-induced BCSC function. Mechanistically, PRMT5 recruitment to the FOXP1 promoter facilitates H3R2me2s, SET1 recruitment, H3K4me3, and gene expression. Our findings are clinically significant, as PRMT5 depletion within established tumor xenografts or treatment of patient-derived BCSCs with a pre-clinical PRMT5 inhibitor substantially reduces BCSC numbers. Together, our findings highlight the importance of PRMT5 in BCSC maintenance and suggest that small-molecule inhibitors of PRMT5 or downstream targets could be an effective strategy eliminating this cancer-causing population.

Purpose: Previous conflicting results about the prognostic significance of estrogen receptor (ER)-β in breast cancer may be explained by contribution of isoforms, of which five exist. Our aim was to elucidate the prognostic significance of ERβ1, ERβ2, and ERβ5 by immunohistochemistry in a large cohort of breast carcinomas with long-term follow-up. Experimental Design: Tissue microarrays were stained with ERβ1, ERβ2, and ERβ5 antibodies and scored as percentage of positive tumor cells and using the Allred system. Nuclear and cytoplasmic staining was evaluated and correlated with histopathologic characteristics, overall survival (OS), and disease-free survival (DFS). Results: Nuclear ERβ2 and ERβ5, but not ERβ1, significantly correlated with OS (P = 0.006, P = 0.039, and P = 0.099, respectively), and ERβ2 additionally with DFS (P = 0.013). ERβ2 also predicted response to endocrine therapy (P = 0.036); correlated positively with ERα, progesterone receptor, androgen receptor, and BRCA1; and correlated inversely with metastasis and vascular invasion. Tumors coexpressing ERβ2 and ERα had better OS and DFS. Cytoplasmic ERβ2 expression, alone or combined with nuclear staining, predicted significantly worse OS. Notably, patients with only cytoplasmic ERβ2 expression had significantly worse outcome (P = 0.0014). Conclusions: This is the first study elucidating the prognostic role of ERβ1, ERβ2, and ERβ5 in a large breast cancer series. ERβ2 is a powerful prognostic indicator in breast cancer, but nuclear and cytoplasmic expression differentially affect outcome. Measuring these in clinical breast cancer could provide a more comprehensive picture of patient outcome, complementing ERα.

It has been shown that the risk of breast cancer developing in certain morphologically identifiable benign breast lesions correlates with expression of estrogen receptor alpha (ER-alpha). Although ER-alpha and ER-beta genes share a large degree of homology, it is generally thought that their distribution and functions are substantially different in many tissues. Recent development of reliable antibodies to ER-beta has provided this first opportunity to test the hypothesis that the likelihood of malignant transformation in morphologically benign breast lesions can be accurately defined by the distribution and level of ER-beta expression relative to that of ER-alpha. Using a monoclonal antibody, ER-beta protein expression has been analyzed in 53 normal breasts and compared with a cohort of histologically distinct breast lesions of different prognostic risk (54 hyperplasia of usual type, 35 ductal carcinoma in situ, and 141 invasive cancers). All of these tissues were also assessed for ER-alpha. Expression of ER-beta protein was also analyzed in an additional spectrum of benign breast lesions with low or negligible risk of progression to malignancy. The median proportion of cells expressing ER-beta was highest in normal breast lobules (median 94.33%, interquartile range 78.25-99.00) but declined significantly through usual ductal hyperplasia (median 76.67, interquartile range 49.17-95.00, P = 0.002) and ductal carcinoma in situ (median 70.00, interquartile range 59.00-85.00, P = 0.009) to invasive cancer (median 60.00, interquartile range 50.00-80.00, P < 0.001). An appreciable proportion (33.81%) of ER-alpha-negative invasive cancers expressed ER-beta. A high but variable level of ER-beta expression occurred in the benign lesions. The data from the intact histologic tissues were evaluated with respect to the relative expression of ER-alpha and ER-beta in five mammary cell lines of different behavioral phenotype (MCF7, ZR-75, T47D, MDAMB231, HUMA121). The highly significant differences in expression and distinct tissue distributions of ER-alpha and ER-beta within the histologic lesions of defined risk, together with the data from the cell lines, support the original hypothesis that the tissue concentration, relative occurrence, and/or interaction of these two types of estrogen receptor may play an important role in modulating mammary tumorigenesis.