In this paper, we evaluate the vulnerability of speaker verification (SV) systems to synthetic speech. The SV systems are based on either the Gaussian mixture model–universal background model (GMM-UBM) or support vector machine (SVM) using GMM supervectors. We use a hidden Markov model (HMM)-based text-to-speech (TTS) synthesizer, which can synthesize speech for a target speaker using small amounts of training data through model adaptation of an average voice or background model. Although the SV systems have a very low equal error rate (EER), when tested with synthetic speech generated from speaker models derived from the Wall Street Journal (WSJ) speech corpus, over 81% of the matched claims are accepted. This result suggests vulnerability in SV systems and thus a need to accurately detect synthetic speech. We propose a new feature based on relative phase shift (RPS), demonstrate reliable detection of synthetic speech, and show how this classifier can be used to improve security of SV systems.
2 February 2015 in IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security
In the field of speaker verification (SV) it is nowadays feasible and relatively easy to create a synthetic voice to deceive a speech driven biometric access system. This paper presents a synthetic speech detector that can be connected at the front-end or at the back-end of a standard SV system, and that will protect it from spoofing attacks coming from state-of-the-art statistical Text to Speech (TTS) systems. The system described is a Gaussian Mixture Model (GMM) based binary classifier that uses natural and copy-synthesized signals obtained from the Wall Street Journal database to train the system models. Three different state-of-the-art vocoders are chosen and modeled using two sets of acoustic parameters: 1) relative phase shift and 2) canonical Mel Frequency Cepstral Coefficients (MFCC) parameters, as baseline. The vocoder dependency of the system and multivocoder modeling features are thoroughly studied. Additional phase-aware vocoders are also tested. Several experiments are carried out, showing that the phase-based parameters perform better and are able to cope with new unknown attacks. The final evaluations, testing synthetic TTS signals obtained from the Blizzard challenge, validate our proposal.
A novel representation of the phase information in harmonic speech models is proposed. A transformation from instantaneous phases to initial phase shift differences with respect to the fundamental frequency provides a clear insight into the structure of the phase information and largely simplifies the manipulation of this information.
In this paper, we present new results from our research into the vulnerability of a speaker verification (SV) system to synthetic speech. We use a HMM-based speech synthesizer, which creates synthetic speech for a targeted speaker through adaptation of a background model and both GMM-UBM and support vector machine (SVM) SV systems. Using 283 speakers from the Wall-Street Journal (WSJ) corpus, our SV systems have a 0.35% EER. When the systems are tested with synthetic speech generated from speaker models derived from the WSJ journal corpus, over 91% of the matched claims are accepted. We propose the use of relative phase shift (RPS) in order to detect synthetic speech and develop a GMM-based synthetic speech classifier (SSC). Using the SSC, we are able to correctly classify human speech in 95% of tests and synthetic speech in 88% of tests thus significantly reducing the vulnerability.
15 December 2009 in IEEE Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing
Voice conversion has been traditionally focused on spectrum. Current systems lack a solid prosody conversion method suitable for different speaking styles. Recently, the unit selection technique has been applied to transform emotional intonation contours. This paper goes one step beyond: it explores strategies for training and configuring the selection cost function in an emotion conversion application. The proposed system, which uses accent groups as basic intonation units and performs conversion also on phoneme durations and intensity, is evaluated by means of a carefully designed subjective test involving the big six emotions. Although the expressiveness of the converted sentences is still far from that of natural emotional speech, satisfactory results are obtained when different configurations are used for different emotions.