Se realizó una revisión acerca de los principales elementos del análisis de primer nivel de los datos cualitativos desde la Teoría Fundamentada. Se describe su concepto y orígenes, la circularidad en el proceso de investigación, el papel del investigador, el muestreo teórico, y se hace énfasis en la codificación y categorización de datos, que son el centro del procedimiento metodológico para hacer manejables los datos y generar una teoría. Este primer nivel de análisis ofrece información valiosa que al ensamblarse con conceptos filosóficos asciende a un segundo nivel de análisis más cercano a la complejidad social.

Medical uncertainty is inherently related to the practice of the physician and generally affects his or her patient care, job satisfaction, continuing education, as well as the overall goals of the health care system. In this paper, some new types of uncertainty, which extend existing typologies, are identified and the contexts and strategies to deal with them are studied. We carried out a mixed-methods study, consisting of a qualitative and a quantitative phase. For the qualitative study, 128 residents reported critical incidents in their clinical practice and described how they coped with the uncertainty in the situation. Each critical incident was analyzed and the most salient situations, 45 in total, were retained. In the quantitative phase, a distinct group of 120 medical residents indicated for each of these situations whether they have been involved in the described situations and, if so, which coping strategy they applied. The analysis examines the relation between characteristics of the situation and the coping strategies. From the qualitative study, a new typology of uncertainty was derived which distinguishes between technical, conceptual, communicational, systemic, and ethical uncertainty. The quantitative analysis showed that, independently of the type of uncertainty, critical incidents are most frequently resolved by consulting senior physicians (49 % overall), which underscores the importance of the hierarchical relationships in the hospital. The insights gained by this study are combined into an integrative model of uncertainty in medical residencies, which combines the type and perceived level of uncertainty, the strategies employed to deal with it, and context elements such as the actors present in the situation. The model considers the final resolution at each of three levels: the patient, the health system, and the physician’s personal level. This study gives insight into how medical residents make decisions under different types of uncertainty, giving account of the context in which the interactions take place and of the strategies used to resolve the incidents. These insights may guide the development of organizational policies that reduce uncertainty and stress in residents during their clinical training.

Competency-based education has been considered the most important pedagogical trend in Medicine in the last two decades. In clinical contexts, competencies are implemented through Entrustable Professional Activities (EPAs) which are observable and measurable. The aim of this paper is to describe the methodology used in the design of educational tools to assess students´ competencies in clinical practice during their undergraduate internship (UI). In this paper, we present the construction of specific APROCs (Actividades Profesionales Confiables) in Surgery (S), Gynecology and Obstetrics (GO) and Family Medicine (FM) rotations with three levels of performance. The study considered a mixed method exploratory type design, a qualitative phase followed by a quantitative validation exercise. In the first stage data was obtained from three rotations (FM, GO and S) through focus groups about real and expected activities of medical interns. Triangulation with other sources was made to construct benchmarks. In the second stage, narrative descriptions with the three levels were validated by professors who teach the different subjects using the Delphi technique. The results may be described both curricular and methodological wise. From the curricular point of view, APROCs were identified in three UI rotations within clinical contexts in Mexico City, benchmarks were developed by levels and validated by experts’ consensus. In regard to methodological issues, this research contributed to the development of a strategy, following six steps, to build APROCs using mixed methods. Developing benchmarks provides a regular and standardized language that helps to evaluate student’s performance and define educational strategies efficiently and accurately. The university academic program was aligned with APROCs in clinical contexts to assure the acquisition of competencies by students.

Introduction: The objective of this study was to describe and analyze residents’ perceptions of characteristics on the expansive/restrictive continuum of their clinical learning environment. Methods: We conducted a quantitative, descriptive and cross-sectional study. A self-administered questionnaire was designed, programmed and applied to residents at the Faculty of Medicine of the National Autonomous University of Mexico. The instrument was structured in eight sections, and for this article, Section 3, which referred to clinical environments and violence was considered. The questionnaire had an 85% response rate, with 12,612 residents from 113 medical units and 78 specialties participating. The reliability and internal consistency measured with alpha omega obtained a value of ω 0.835 (CI; 0.828–0.843). Results: Unpleasant, competitive, tense and conflictive contexts were related to restrictive environments. Sexual orientation influenced the perception of intolerance in the clinical setting with respect to discriminatory comments, such that for gender minorities, the environment was experienced as exclusionary. First-year residents perceived environments as more aggressive, a perception that tended to decrease in later years of residency. Discussion: Abuses in power relations, rigid hierarchical positions and offensive clinical interactions may foster restrictive environments. In such settings, the reproduction of socio-culturally learned violence is feasible; however, asymmetrical relationships may be deconstructed and transformed.

El Modelo Educativo para Desarrollar Actividades Profesionales Confiables (MEDAPROC) surge como respuesta a la implementación de la educación basada en competencias. Es un proyecto multidisciplinario fundamentado en la epistemología interpretativa, el paradigma constructivista, las transformaciones del Sistema Nacional de Salud y el contexto del ejercicio actual de la medicina. Su meta es favorecer la adquisición de conocimientos, habilidades y actitudes indispensables por parte del estudiante de medicina. Integra la tendencia internacional de las Entrustable Professional Activities y las naturaliza como las Actividades Profesionales Confiables (APROC). MEDAPROC propone que el desarrollo de las APROC se promueva de manera inversa, desde el perfil de egreso hasta el inicio de los estudios de pregrado, por lo tanto, se involucra en diversas fases y procesos de aprendizaje y enseñanza (planeación, didáctica, evaluación y realimentación) por medio de proyectos para implementar estrategias didácticas y recursos de evaluación, con el apoyo de la formación docente, la investigación educativa y la tecnología. Su objetivo es lograr la mejora de la educación médica y de las ciencias de la salud, con el firme propósito de generar un cambio positivo en la calidad de la atención desde el entorno educativo. The Educational Model to Develop Entrustable Professional Activities (MEDAPROC) arises as a response to the implementation of competency-based education. It is a multidisciplinary project based on interpretative epistemology, the constructivist paradigm, the transformations of the national health system, and the context of the current practice of medicine. Its purpose is to encourage the acquisition of essential knowledge, skills, and attitudes by the medical student. It integrates the international trend of the entrustable professional activities and converts them into entrustable professional activities (APROC). MEDAPROC proposes that the development of the APROC be promoted in an inverse manner, from the profile of the graduate to the beginning of the undergraduate studies. Therefore, it is involved in several phases of the learning and teaching process (planning, didactics, assessment, and feedback) through projects to implement didactic strategies and assessment resources, with the support of teacher training, educational research, and technology. Its aim is to improve medical and health sciences education, with the firm purpose of making a positive change in the health care quality from the educational environment.

Las restricciones impuestas por la contingencia sanitaria y el riesgo de contagio han influido en la movilidad y las modalidades de las interacciones. El objetivo de este trabajo es explorar la pluralidad de opciones para la cogeneración y recabación de material en la fase de trabajo de campo en proyectos de investigación cualitativa. Se transita por los componentes del diseño metodológico (sujetos participantes, recursos tecnológicos disponibles, acuerdos previos al encuentro y plan de análisis) para reflexionar sobre las transformaciones que involucra la modalidad virtual. Enseguida se discute la manera en que el entorno virtual abre nuevas posibilidades para investigar y procesar datos. La mediación tecnológica abre canales de comunicación que convocan a una gran diversidad de perfiles con características interseccionales diversas. También se pluralizan los formatos para procesar y presentar los hallazgos de investigación como videos documentales, infografías, fotomontajes, comics, animaciones, textos con distintos géneros literarios, entre otros. El cambio en las estrategias en campo, afecta a nivel epistemológico, pues el conocimiento se construye de otra manera, por medio de narrativas situacionales y experienciales compuestas de conocimientos, emociones y descripciones relacionales diacrónicas y sincrónicas, expresados en el espacio virtual. No obstante, las consideraciones éticas del trabajo de campo en la modalidad virtual se mantienen. Ante la nueva normalidad, existen tres respuestas ante los desafíos para la recabación de información o co-construcción de datos: mantener en la medida de lo posible el proyecto original y ver la manera de propiciar encuentros físicos con sana distancia y otras medidas higiénicas. La segunda respuesta es trasladar los encuentros presenciales al espacio virtual, y la tercera es pensar nuevas modalidades investigativas y crear narrativas en formatos innovadores utilizando tecnologías versátiles.