Peter Hains

Dr. Peter Hains

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

30Years (1997-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
30 July 2020 in Nature Communications
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
RPRebecca Poulos
Rebecca Poulos
PHPeter Hains
Peter Hains
RSRohan Shah
Rohan Shah
NLNatasha Lucas
Natasha Lucas
DXDylan Xavier
Dylan Xavier
QZQing Zhong
Qing Zhong
Reproducible research is the bedrock of experimental science. To enable the deployment of large-scale proteomics, we assess the reproducibility of mass spectrometry (MS) over time and across instruments and develop computational methods for improving quantitative accuracy. We perform 1560 data independent acquisition (DIA)-MS runs of eight samples containing known proportions of ovarian and prostate cancer tissue and yeast, or control HEK293T cells. Replicates are run on six mass spectrometers operating continuously with varying maintenance schedules over four months, interspersed with ~5000 other runs. We utilise negative controls and replicates to remove unwanted variation and enhance biological signal, outperforming existing methods. We also design a method for reducing missing values. Integrating these computational modules into a pipeline (ProNorM), we mitigate variation among instruments over time and accurately predict tissue proportions. We demonstrate how to improve the quantitative analysis of large-scale DIA-MS data, providing a pathway toward clinical proteomics.

1 February 2002 in Journal of Cereal Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DSD.J. Skylas
D.J. Skylas
SCStuart J. Cordwell
Stuart J. Cordwell
PHPeter Hains
Peter Hains
MLMartin Larsen
Martin Larsen
DBD.J. Basseal
D.J. Basseal
CWC.W. Wrigley
C.W. Wrigley

1 December 2008 in Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Proteins and Proteomics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PHPeter Hains
Peter Hains
RTRoger J.W. Truscott
Roger J.W. Truscott

8 May 2003 in Proteomics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SBSoo‐Han Bae
Soo‐Han Bae
AHAndrew G. Harris
Andrew G. Harris
PHPeter Hains
Peter Hains
HCHong Chen
Hong Chen
DGDavid E. Garfin
David E. Garfin
SCStuart J. Cordwell
Stuart J. Cordwell
Two‐dimensional gel electrophoresis (2‐DE) is currently the method of choice for separating complex mixtures of proteins for visual comparison in proteome analysis. This technology, however, is biased against certain classes of proteins including low abundance and hydrophobic proteins. Proteins with extremely alkaline isoelectric points (pI) are often very poorly represented using 2‐DE technology, even when complex mixtures are separated using commercially available pH 6–11 or pH 7–10 immobilized pH gradients. The genome of the human gut pathogen, Helicobacter pylori, is dominated by genes encoding basic proteins, and is therefore a useful model for examining methodology suitable for separating such proteins. H. pylori proteins were separated on pH 6–11 and novel pH 9–12 immobilized pH gradients and 65 protein spots were subjected to matrix‐assisted laser desorption/ionization‐time of flight mass spectrometry, leading to the identification of 49 unique proteins. No proteins were characterized with a theoretical pI of greater than 10.23. A second approach to examine extremely alkaline proteins (pI > 9.0) utilized a prefractionation isoelectric focusing. Proteins were separated into two fractions using Gradiflow technology, and the extremely basic fraction subjected to both sodium dodecyl sulphate‐polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and liquid chromatography (LC) – tandem mass spectrometry post‐tryptic digest, allowing the identification of 17 and 13 proteins, respectively. Gradiflow separations were highly specific for proteins with pI > 9.0, however, a single LC separation only allowed the identification of peptides from highly abundant proteins. These methods and those encompassing multiple LC ‘dimensions’ may be a useful complement to 2‐DE for ‘near‐to‐total’ proteome coverage in the alkaline pH range.

1 August 2007 in Biochemical Pharmacology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
YCYoumie Chong
Youmie Chong
JHJessica L. Hayes
Jessica L. Hayes
BSBrianna Sollod
Brianna Sollod
SWSuping Wen
Suping Wen
DWDavid T. Wilson
David T. Wilson
GNGraham Nicholson
Graham Nicholson

23 August 2017 in Journal of Proteome Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PHPeter Hains
Peter Hains
PRPhillip J. Robinson
Phillip J. Robinson