Background: Ruxolitinib is approved for patients with polycythemia vera (PV) who are resistant/intolerant to hydroxyurea, but its impact on preventing thrombosis or disease‐progression is unknown.Methods: A retrospective, real‐world analysis was performed on the outcomes of 377 patients with resistance/intolerance to hydroxyurea from the Spanish Registry of Polycythemia Vera according to subsequent treatment with ruxolitinib (n = 105) or the best available therapy (BAT; n = 272). Survival probabilities and rates of thrombosis, hemorrhage, acute myeloid leukemia, myelofibrosis, and second primary cancers were calculated according to treatment. To minimize biases in treatment allocation, all results were adjusted by a propensity score for receiving ruxolitinib or BAT.Results: Patients receiving ruxolitinib had a significantly lower rate of arterial thrombosis than those on BAT (0.4% vs 2.3% per year; P = .03), and this persisted as a trend after adjustment for the propensity to have received the drug (incidence rate ratio, 0.18; 95% confidence interval, 0.02‐1.3; P = .09). There were no significant differences in the rates of venous thrombosis (0.8% and 1.1% for ruxolitinib and BAT, respectively; P = .7) and major bleeding (0.8% and 0.9%, respectively; P = .9). Ruxolitinib exposure was not associated with a higher rate of second primary cancers, including all types of neoplasia, noncutaneous cancers, and nonmelanoma skin cancers. After a median follow‐up of 3.5 years, there were no differences in survival or progression to acute leukemia or myelofibrosis between the 2 groups.Conclusions: The results suggest that ruxolitinib treatment for PV patients with resistance/intolerance to hydroxyurea may reduce the incidence of arterial thrombosis.Lay Summary: Ruxolitinib is better than other available therapies in achieving hematocrit control and symptom relief in patients with polycythemia vera who are resistant/intolerant to hydroxyurea, but we still do not know whether ruxolitinib provides an additional benefit in preventing thrombosis or disease progression. We retrospectively studied the outcomes of 377 patients with resistance/intolerance to hydroxyurea from the Spanish Registry of Polycythemia Vera according to whether they subsequently received ruxolitinib (n = 105) or the best available therapy (n = 272). Our findings suggest that ruxolitinib could reduce the incidence of arterial thrombosis, but a disease‐modifying effect could not be demonstrated for ruxolitinib in this patient population.

Background JAK2V617F-mutated myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) exhibit abnormal proliferation of bone marrow progenitors and increased risk of thrombosis, specifically in splanchnic veins (SVT). The contribution of the endothelium to the development of the prothrombotic phenotype was explored. Material and Methods Plasma and serum samples from JAK2V617F MPN patients with (n=26) or without (n=7) thrombotic debut and different treatments, were obtained (n=33). Cultured endothelial cells (ECs) were exposed to serum samples from these patients and from healthy donors as controls. Changes in markers of inflammation (VCAM-1, ICAM-1), cell permeability (VE-cadherin), production of VWF, extracellular matrix (ECM) reactivity, and activation of intracellular signaling pathways related to stress, proliferation, inflammation (Akt, p44/42, IkBa), and JAK2/STAT3 pathway, were assessed by immunofluorescence, flow adhesion, SDS-PAGE and immunoblot. Additionally, circulating markers of endothelial activation and damage (VWF, sVCAM-1, sTNFRI, thrombomodulin, angiopoietin-2, a2-antiplasmin activity, PAI-1) were evaluated in Patients' plasma. Results The in vitro studies showed that EC exposure to MPN thrombotic patients' sera resulted in increased VCAM-1 and ICAM-1, and reduced VE-cadherin expression (p<0.05) at the cell surface. Production and release of VWF to the ECM were higher (p<0.05), with increased platelet adhesion after perfusing whole blood, being more noticeable in response to sera from non-treated patients. Furthermore, intracellular activation of Akt, p44/42, IkBa and JAK2/STAT3 was observed. Moreover, plasma levels of VWF, TNF-R1, VCAM-1, thrombomodulin, and angiopoietin-2 were higher in JAK2V617F+ MPN patients with thrombosis. Conclusion The present findings suggest that circulating factors in MPNs with SVT debut induce endothelial proinflammatory and prothrombotic phenotypes, which are modulated in vitro with MPN treatment. BDM designed and performed the experiments, analyzed the results, designed the images, and wrote the manuscript. JM-S, MG, AR, and HV-C participated in the experiments and analysis of the results. MN, GE, JCG-P, and EC reviewed the results and manuscript. EA-R, AA-L, and MD-R designed, supervised, and reviewed the study, results, and manuscript. ^* These authors contributed equally to this work. Received: 27 August 2024 Accepted: 07 December 2024 Article published online: 14 January 2025 © 2025. Thieme. All rights reserved. Georg Thieme Verlag KG Oswald-Hesse-Straße 50, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany