Epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC), a primarily high-grade serous carcinoma (HGSOC), is one of the major causes of high death-to-incidence ratios of all gynecological cancers. Cytoreductive surgery and platinum-based chemotherapy represent the main treatments for this aggressive disease. Molecular characterization of HGSOC has revealed that up to 50% of cases have a deficiency in the homologous recombination repair (HRR) system, which makes these tumors sensitive to poly ADP-ribose inhibitors (PARP-is). However, drug resistance often occurs and overcoming it represents a big challenge. A number of strategies are under investigation, with the most promising being combinations of PARP-is with antiangiogenetic agents and immune checkpoint inhibitors. Moreover, new drugs targeting different pathways, including the ATR-CHK1-WEE1, the PI3K-AKT and the RAS/RAF/MEK, are under development both in phase I and II–III clinical trials. Nevertheless, there is still a long way to go, and the next few years promise to be exciting.

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains a disease with a poor prognosis despite the advances in therapies. NSCLC with actionable oncogenic alterations represent a subgroup of diseases for which tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have shown relevant and robust impact on prognosis, both in early and advanced stages. While the introduction of powerful TKIs increases the ratio of potentially curable patients, the disease does develop resistance over time through either secondary mutations or bypass activating tracks. Therefore, new treatment strategies are being developed to either overcome this inevitable resistance or to prevent it, and proteolysis targeting chimera agents (PROTACs) are among them. They consist of two linked molecules that bind to a target protein and an E3 ubiquitin ligase that causes ubiquitination and degradation of proteins of interest. In this paper, we review the rationale for PROTAC therapy and the current development of PROTACs for oncogene-addicted lung cancer. Moreover, we critically analyze the strengths and limitations of this promising technique that may help pave the way for future perspectives.

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains a dire disease being the first cause of cancer death among both genders. Early-stage NSCLC often has better treatment outcomes despite it being a highly heterogeneous disease. So far, the neo-adjuvant chemotherapy strategies have led to a small benefit with an improvement of 5% in overall survival as an absolute benefit. Recently, the introduction of immune checkpoint inhibitors combined with chemotherapy has shown robust efficacy in terms of event-free survival and overall survival. Thus, these combinations are today considered a new standard of care in early-stage NSCLC. The application of these strategies to all-comer population lead to confounding definitive results regarding the efficacy and predictive biomarkers are urgently needed balancing the promise of healing than toxicities. At present, the clinical staging TNM system guides the clinical choice, however it is not entirely sufficient. Circulant tumoral DNA (ctDNA) emerged as a promising prognostic and predictive biomarker that may guide the future perioperative strategy and pave the way to personalized medicine also in this exciting field. This narrative review aims to put in the context the employment of ctDNA, give some perspective and suggestions weighing the pros and cons of this technique for our tomorrow clinical practice.

Breast cancer (BC) is a highly heterogeneous disease with diverse molecular subtypes, which complicates prognosis and treatment. In this study, we performed a multi-omics clustering analysis using the Cancer Integration via MultIkernel LeaRning (CIMLR) method on a large BC dataset from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) to identify key prognostic biomarkers. We identified three genes—LMO1, PRAME, and RSPO2—that were significantly associated with poor prognosis in both the TCGA dataset and an additional dataset comprising 146 metastatic BC patients. Patients’ stratification based on the expression of these three genes revealed distinct subtypes with markedly different overall survival (OS) outcomes. Further validation using almost 2000 BC patients’ data from the METABRIC dataset and RNA sequencing data from therapy-resistant cell lines confirmed the upregulation of LMO1 and PRAME, respectively, in patients with worse prognosis and in resistant cells, also suggesting their potential role in drug resistance. Our findings highlight LMO1 and PRAME as potential biomarkers for identifying high-risk BC patients and informing targeted treatment strategies. This study provides valuable insights into the multi-omics landscape of BC and underscores the importance of personalized therapeutic approaches based on molecular profiles.

The incidence of cancer-associated thrombosis has increased in recent years. While the association between venous thromboembolism (VTE) and chemotherapy is well established, there is no clear link between immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and VTE risk. Many risk assessment models (RAMs) have been developed to identify high-risk patients who need prophylaxis. However, these models are validated in patients undergoing chemotherapy, while they are scarce in those receiving immunotherapy. Moreover, the mechanisms linking ICIs to thrombosis are still a matter of debate. They include the upregulation of pro-inflammatory intracellular pathways, the release of cytokines, the activation of innate immune cells, the release of tissue factors and platelet activation, and the increase in adhesion molecules, thus resulting in the recruitment of agents involved in coagulation. Promising biomarkers are emerging to identify patients undergoing ICIs who are at high risk of developing VTE and need prophylaxis. In this review we investigate the possible causation between cancer-associated thrombosis (CAT) and immunotherapy and the underlying pathophysiological mechanisms. Thus, we suggest the most appropriate therapeutic approaches based on currently available data.

According to a modern view, cancer no longer follows a purely mechanistic model. Rather, a tumor is conceived as a more complex structure, composed of cancer cells, the activities of which may interact and reshape the so-called tumor microenvironment (TME), leading to preservation of specific tumoral niches and promoting the survival of tumoral stem cells. Background/Objective: Therapeutic strategies must deal with this unique cancer architecture in the near future by widening their range of activities outside the cancer cells and rewiring a TME to ensure it is hostile to cancer growth. Therefore, an intratumoral therapeutic strategy may open the door to a new type of anticancer activity, one that directly injures the tumoral structure while also eliciting an influence on the TME through local and systemic immunomodulation. This review would like to assess the current situation of intratumoral strategies and their clinical implications. Methods We analyzed data from phase I, II, and III trials, comprehensive reviews and relevant clinical and preclinical research, from robust databases, like PUBMED, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and clinicaltrials.gov. Results: Intratumoral strategies can be quite variable. It is possible the injection and inhalation of traditional antiblastic agents or immunomodulant agents, or intrapleural administration. Ablation strategy is available, both thermal and photodynamic method. Moreover, TTfields and NPs are analyzed and also brachytherapy is mentioned. Intratumoral therapy can find space in “adjuvant”/perioperative or metastatic settings. Finally, intratumoral strategies allow to synergize their activities with systemic therapies, guaranteeing better local and systemic disease control. Conclusions: Intratumoral strategies are overall promising. Antiblastic/immunomodulant injection and NPs use are especially interesting and intriguing. But, there is generally a lack of phase II and III trials, in particular NPs use need additional experimentation and clinical studies.