Anibal Nieto

Dr. Anibal Nieto

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

12Years (2015-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 January 2019 in Journal of Gynecologic Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
ISIsabel Ñíguez Sevilla
Isabel Ñíguez Sevilla
FLFrancisco Machado Linde
Francisco Machado Linde
MSMaria del Pilar Marín Sánchez
Maria del Pilar Marín Sánchez
Julián J. Arense-GonzaloJulián J. Arense-Gonzalo
Julián J. Arense-Gonzalo
ATAmparo Torroba
Amparo Torroba
MPMaria Teresa Prieto-Sanchez
Maria Teresa Prieto-Sanchez
Sevilla IÑ, et al. J Gynecol Oncol. 2018 Aug;30:e63. https://doi.org/10.3802/jgo.2019.30.e63

1 April 2020 in Clinical Nutrition
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
AGAntonio Gázquez
Antonio Gázquez
MPMaria Teresa Prieto-Sanchez
Maria Teresa Prieto-Sanchez
JBJ.E. Blanco-Carnero
J.E. Blanco-Carnero
MRM. Ruíz-Palacios
M. Ruíz-Palacios
ANAnibal Nieto
Anibal Nieto
ELElvira Larque
Elvira Larque

1 December 2015 in European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ARAlmudena Peces Rama
Almudena Peces Rama
MLMaría Carmen Llanos Llanos
María Carmen Llanos Llanos
MPMaria Teresa Prieto-Sanchez
Maria Teresa Prieto-Sanchez
JZJuan Luis Alcázar Zambrano
Juan Luis Alcázar Zambrano
AMAntonio Martínez Mendoza
Antonio Martínez Mendoza
ANAnibal Nieto
Anibal Nieto

4 July 2023 in Cancers
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
AGAlida González Gil
Alida González Gil
APAlvaro F Cerezuela Fernandez de Palencia
Alvaro F Cerezuela Fernandez de Palencia
ÁRÁlvaro Jesús Gómez Ruiz
Álvaro Jesús Gómez Ruiz
EGElena Gil-Gomez
Elena Gil-Gomez
FHFrancisco Javier López Hernández
Francisco Javier López Hernández
PCPedro Antonio Cascales-Campos
Pedro Antonio Cascales-Campos
Ovarian cancer is the leading cause of death due to gynecological tumors in the female population. Despite optimal first-line treatment, including cytoreduction and platinum-based systemic chemotherapy, recurrences are frequent. The use of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) has been criticized, especially because of the lack of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with convincing results to support the use of HIPEC in patients with ovarian cancer with peritoneal dissemination. In 2018, the clinical trial published by Van Driel et al. reported improved outcomes in favor of HIPEC treatment with cisplatin. In this study, we conducted a national survey within the Spanish group of peritoneal surgical oncology (Grupo Español de Cirugía Oncológica Peritoneal, GECOP) to explore the impact of the results of this RCT on clinical practice. A total of 33 groups completed the survey. Routine clinical practice was not changed in 28 of the 33 groups (85%) based on the results of the Van Driel trial. Despite the results of this RCT, most groups considered that more RCTs are needed and that, in the future, HIPEC may become the standard of care. In conclusion, the results from RCTs evaluating HIPEC treatment in patients with ovarian cancer has not been transferred to clinical practice.

19 January 2022 in Journal of Clinical Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JSJavier Sanchez-Romero
Javier Sanchez-Romero
JPJesús López Pérez
Jesús López Pérez
AFAna Belén Flores-Muñoz
Ana Belén Flores-Muñoz
MMMaría Josefa Méndez-Martínez
María Josefa Méndez-Martínez
FAFernando Araico-Rodríguez
Fernando Araico-Rodríguez
MPMaria Teresa Prieto-Sanchez
Maria Teresa Prieto-Sanchez
Although the influence of neuraxial anesthesia or sedation with remifentanil in external cephalic version (ECV) is widely known, ECV results using propofol have not been previously analyzed. This study aimed to evaluate ECV outcomes when propofol was used. An observational analysis of ECV was performed between 1 January 2018 and 31 December 2020. ECV was accomplished with tocolysis and propofol. One hundred and thirty-one pregnant women were recruited. The propofol mean dose was 156.1 mg (SD 6.1). A cephalic presentation was achieved in 61.1% (80/131) of the pregnant women. In total, 56.7% (38/67) of pregnant women with cephalic presentation at labor had a spontaneous delivery, 26.9% (18/67) had an operative delivery, and an intrapartum urgent cesarean section was performed in 16.4% (11/67). In total, 46 pregnant women (35.9%) were scheduled for an elective cesarean section due to non-cephalic presentation. The emergency cesarean section rate during the following 24 h was 10.7% (14/131). A major ECV complication arose in 15 cases (11.5%). ECV outcomes when propofol was used seems to be similar to those with other anesthetic adjunct, so sedation with propofol could be an adequate option for ECV. More studies are needed to compare its effectiveness with neuraxial techniques.

16 June 2024 in International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
JSJavier Sanchez-Romero
Javier Sanchez-Romero
RGRosa María Gallego‐Pozuelo
Rosa María Gallego‐Pozuelo
HDHajar Dahmouni‐Dahmouni
Hajar Dahmouni‐Dahmouni
JCJose Eliseo Blanco carnero
Jose Eliseo Blanco carnero
FAFernando Araico‐Rodríguez
Fernando Araico‐Rodríguez
Catalina De Paco MatallanaCatalina De Paco Matallana
Catalina De Paco Matallana
Objective: To analyze the success rate of external cephalic version (ECV) in pregnant women with a history of previous cesarean section, as well as to describe the rate of complications associated with the procedure.Methods: A retrospective cohort study of women who were offered an ECV at “Virgen de la Arrixaca” Clinic University Hospital (Murcia, Spain) between January 2014 and December 2023. We collected data for previous cesarean delivery, obstetric history, fetal presentation, amniotic fluid volume, ECV success rate, complications related to ECV, mode of delivery, and neonatal outcomes. The study confidently performed ECV under sedation with propofol and tocolysis with ritodrine. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted to compare the success rate of ECV, ECV complications, and mode of delivery between women with and without previous cesarean sections.Results: Of 1116 pregnant women who were offered ECV, 911 were included in the study, with 42 having a previous cesarean section. The success rate of ECV in pregnant women with a previous cesarean section was 78.6% (adjusted odds ratio 1.18; 95% confidence interval 0.49–2.86; P = 0.708), with a low complication rate of 9.5%, such as non‐reassuring fetal heart rate (7.1%) or major vaginal bleeding (2.4%). Of the women who attempted a vaginal delivery after ECV, 80.8% were successful.Conclusions: These findings support that ECV is a safe and effective option for women with a previous cesarean section, with success rates comparable to those in women without a previous cesarean section.