Endometrial receptivity plays a crucial role in the establishment of a healthy pregnancy in cycles of assisted reproduction. The endometrium as a key factor during reproduction can be assessed in multiple ways, most commonly through transvaginal grey-scale or 3-D ultrasound. It has been shown that controlled ovarian hyperstimulation has a great impact on the uterine lining, which leads to different study results for the predictive value of endometrial factors measured on different cycle days. There is no clear consensus on whether endometrial factors are appropriate to predict treatment outcome and if so, which one is suited best. The aim of this review is to summarize recent findings of studies about the influence of endometrial thickness, volume and pattern on IVF- and ICSI-treatment outcome and provide an overview of future developments in the field. Die endometriale Rezeptivität spielt eine entscheidende Rolle für den Beginn und den Erhalt einer Schwangerschaft. Die physiologische Ausbildung eines implantationsfördernden und -erhaltenden Endometriums wird daher als Schlüsselfaktor bei allen fertilitätsunterstützenden therapeutischen Behandlungen angesehen. Dabei wird in der Praxis der Zustand des Endometriums mithilfe des Einsatzes des transvaginalen Ultraschalls bestimmt. Die kontrollierte ovarielle Überstimulation, wie sie im Rahmen einer IVF-Therapie angewandt wird, kann einen erheblichen Einfluss auf den Zustand des Endometriums zum Zeitpunkt der Untersuchung haben. Bislang gibt es allerdings keinen klaren Konsens darüber, ob endometriale Faktoren geeignet sind, um das Behandlungsergebnis einer IVF-Therapie verlässlich vorhersagen zu können. Das Ziel dieser Übersichtsarbeit ist es daher, die aktuellen wissenschaftlichen Ergebnisse über den Einfluss der mithilfe von Ultraschallmessungen gewonnenen endometrialen Parametern im Rahmen der IVF-Behandlung zusammenzufassen und einen Überblick über zukünftige Entwicklungen auf diesem Gebiet zu geben.
Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) is a potentially life-threatening condition associated with increased vascular permeability. The vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) system and its receptors have been identified as the main angiogenic factors responsible for increased capillary permeability and are therefore discussed as crucial for the occurrence of OHSS. Recently, a number of soluble receptors for the VEGFs have been detected (sVEGF-Rs) and it has been shown that these sVEGF-Rs compete with the membrane-standing VEGF-R to bind VEGFs. We analyzed the serum levels of soluble VEGF-R1, -R2 and -R3 in 34 patients suffering from OHSS and in 34 controls without this disease. In a subgroup analysis, we correlated the severity of the OHSS with the detected amounts of VEGF-R1, -R2 and -R3. In addition, we determined the amount of total VEGF-A in the samples. All the three soluble VEGF receptors tended to be higher in the control group compared with that in the OHSS group but this difference only reached significance for sVEGF-R2 (mean ± SEM: 15.5 ± 0.6 versus 13.8 ± 0.5 ng/ml, respectively, P< 0.05). In the subgroup analysis, sVEGF-R2 levels decreased as the severity of OHSS increased (OHSS-I: 16.8 ± 1.9 ng/ml and OHSS-III: 12.7 ± 1.0 ng/ml, P< 0.05) Moreover, the serum levels of total VEGF-A were higher in the OHSS group than those in the controls (537.7 ± 38.9 versus 351 ± 53.4 pg/ml, respectively P< 0.05). We propose that VEGF-A plays a role in the occurrence of OHSS, that the amount of biologically available VEGF-A is modulated by sVEGF-Rs and that different combinations of VEGF-A and sVEGF-R levels might contribute to the severity of OHSS.
31 August 2013 in Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology
Background: Although most pregnancies after IVF result in normal healthy outcomes, an increased risk for a number of obstetric and neonatal complications, compared to naturally conceived pregnancies, has been reported. While there are many studies that compare pregnancies after assisted reproductive techniques with spontaneously conceived pregnancies, fewer data are available that evaluate the differences between IVF and ICSI-conceived pregnancies. The aim of our present study was, therefore, to compare obstetric and perinatal outcomes in pregnancies conceived after in vitro fertilization (IVF) versus intracytoplasmatic sperm injection (ICSI). Methods: Three-hundred thirty four women who had become pregnant after an IVF or ICSI procedure resulted in a total of 530 children referred between 2003 und 2009 to the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology of the Medical University of Vienna, a tertiary care center, and were included in this retrospective cohort study. We assessed maternal and fetal parameters in both groups (IVF and ICSI). The main study outcomes were preterm delivery, the need for neonatal intensive care, and congenital malformations. Moreover, we compared the course of pregnancy between both groups and the occurrence of complications that led to maternal hospitalization during pregnancy. Results: There were 80 children conceived via ICSI and 450 children conceived via IVF. Mean gestational age was significantly lower in the ICSI group (p = 0.001). After ICSI, the birth weight (p = 0.008) and the mean APGAR values after 1 minute and after 10 minutes were lower compared to that of the IVF group (p = 0.016 and p = 0.047, respectively). Moreover, ICSI-conceived children had to be hospitalized more often at a neonatal intensive care unit (p = 0.004). There was no difference in pH of the umbilical artery or in major congenital malformations between the two groups. Pregnancy complications (i.e., premature rupture of membranes, cervical insufficiency, and premature uterine contractions) and the need for maternal hospitalization during pregnancy were found significantly more often after IVF (p = 0.0016 and p = 0.0095, respectively), compared to the ICSI group. Conclusions: When comparing IVF versus ICSI-conceived pregnancies at a tertiary care center, we found the course of pregnancy to be more complicated after IVF, whereas the primary fetal outcome seemed to be better in this group than after ICSI treatment.
Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) is the most serious complication of IVF/ICSI therapy. The pathophysiology and etiology of the disease is still not fully clarified. To assess whether polymorphisms of the VEGF/VEGF-receptor system contribute to the occurrence of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS), we performed a retrospective analysis of 116 OHSS patients, and 124 female controls. The following SNPs were genotyped: Rs2071559 (VEGFR2-604); rs2305948 (VEGFR2-1192); rs1870377 (VEGFR2-1719); rs2010963 (VEGF-405); and rs111458691 (VEGFR1-519). Odds ratios (ORs) were estimated with a 95% confidence interval (CI). Linkage disequilibrium (LD) analysis was performed in the three loci of the VEGFR2 gene. We found an overrepresentation of the T allele of the VEGFR1-519 polymorphism in OHSS patients (P = 0.02, OR: 3.62, CI: 1.16 – 11.27). By genotype modeling, we found that polymorphism of VEGFR1-519 and VEGF-405 showed significant differences in patients and controls (p = 0.02, OR: 3.79 CI: 1.98 – 11.97 and p = 0.000005, OR: 0.29, CI: 0.17 – 0.50). LD analysis revealed significant linkage disequilibrium in VEGFR2. Polymorphisms in the VEGFR2 gene and in the VEGF gene are associated with the occurrence of OHSS. This strengthens the evidence for an important role of the VEGF/VEGF- receptor system in the occurrence of OHSS.
9 July 2009 in American Journal of Reproductive Immunology
Introduction Smoking is a serious problem for the health care system. Many of the compounds identified in cigarette smoke have toxic effects on the fertility of both females and males. The purpose of this study was to determine whether smoking affects clinical factors during IVF/ICSI therapy in a single-center reproductive unit. Material and Methods In a retrospective study of 200 IVF/ICSI cycles, endometrial thickness and the outcome of IVF/ICSI therapy were analyzed. Results Endometrial thickness was significantly lower in smoking patients than in non-smoking patients (10.4 ± 1.5 mm vs. 11.6 ± 1.8 mm). Age was significantly higher in women who failed to conceive. The total dose of gonadotropins administered was significantly lower in pregnant patients and the highest pregnancy rate was achieved with an rFSH protocol. BMI and number of cigarettes smoked did not influence treatment outcomes in this study. Conclusion We showed that smoking has a negative effect on endometrial thickness on the day of embryo transfer. This may help to further explain the detrimental influence of tobacco smoke on implantation and pregnancy rates during assisted reproduction therapy. Einleitung Rauchen ist ein ernsthaftes Problem für das Gesundheitssystem. Viele der im Zigarettenrauch nachgewiesenen Verbindungen haben toxische Wirkungen auf die Fruchtbarkeit von Frauen und Männern. Ziel dieser Studie war es zu untersuchen, ob Rauchen klinische Parameter während einer IVF/ICSI-Therapie beeinflusst. Material und Methoden In einer retrospektiven Studie mit 200 IVF/ICSI-Zyklen wurden die Endometriumdicke und verschiedene Zielparameter der IVF/ICSI-Therapie analysiert. Ergebnisse Die Dicke der Gebärmutterschleimhaut war bei rauchenden Patienten signifikant geringer als bei Nichtrauchern (10,4 ± 1,5 mm vs. 11,6 ± 1,8 mm). Das Alter war bei Frauen, die nicht schwanger waren, deutlich höher. Die Gesamtdosis der verabreichten Gonadotropine war bei schwangeren Patienten signifikant niedriger und die höchste Schwangerschaftsrate wurde mit einem rFSH-Protokoll festgestellt. BMI und die Anzahl der gerauchten Zigaretten hatten keinen Einfluss auf das Behandlungsergebnis in dieser Studie. Fazit Wir konnten zeigen, dass Rauchen die Dicke der Gebärmutterschleimhaut am Tag des Embryotransfers negativ beeinflusst. Diese Studie kann daher dazu beitragen, den schädlichen Einfluss des Tabakrauchs auf die Implantations- und Schwangerschaftsrate während der assistierten Reproduktionstherapie zu erklären.
About Me
Detlef Pietrowski, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical University of Vienna, Spitalgasse 23, 1090 Vienna, Austria
Detlef Pietrowski, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical University of Vienna, Spitalgasse 23, 1090 Vienna, Austria