This review paper explores the role of human taste panels and artificial neural networks (ANNs) in taste-masking paediatric drug formulations. Given the ethical, practical, and regulatory challenges of employing children, young adults (18–40) can serve as suitable substitutes due to the similarity in their taste sensitivity. Taste panellists need not be experts in sensory evaluation so long as a reference product is used during evaluation; however, they should be screened for bitterness taste detection thresholds. For a more robust evaluation during the developmental phase, considerations of a scoring system and the calculation of an acceptance value may be beneficial in determining the likelihood of recommending a formulation for further development. On the technological front, artificial neural networks (ANNs) can be exploited in taste-masking optimisation of medicinal formulations as they can model complex relationships between variables and enable predictions not possible previously to optimise product profiles. Machine learning classifiers may therefore tackle the challenge of predicting the bitterness intensity of paediatric formulations. While advancements have been made, further work is needed to identify effective taste-masking techniques for specific drug molecules. Continuous refinement of machine learning algorithms, using human panellist acceptability scores, can aid in enhancing paediatric formulation development and overcoming taste-masking challenges.

The in-vivo plasma concentration of penicillin needed to prevent Streptococcus pyogenes pharyngitis, recurrent acute rheumatic fever, and progressive rheumatic heart disease is not known. We used a human challenge model to assess the minimum penicillin concentration required to prevent streptococcal pharyngitis. In CHIPS, a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, human challenge trial, healthy adult volunteers were randomly assigned by a computer-generated random sequence to target steady-state penicillin plasma concentrations (placebo, 3, 6, 9, 12, or 20 ng/mL). The study was a single-centre trial held in Perth, WA, Australia. Participants had to be healthy adults, aged 18-40 years, at low risk of complicated S pyogenes disease, and without high type-specific IgG antibodies against the emm75 S pyogenes challenge strain. Participants and staff involved in clinical care remained masked to treatment allocation for the duration of the study. Individualised 5-day continuous intravenous infusions of penicillin were commenced 12 h before direct pharyngeal application of the emm75 challenge strain. The primary endpoint was clinical pharyngitis. This trial is registered on the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, ACTRN12621000751875, and is completed. Between Aug 23, 2022, and July 31, 2023, 60 participants were randomly assigned (35 [58%] were female and 25 [42%] were male), with 57 included in the analysis. The clinical pharyngitis endpoint was met in eight (57%) of 14 in the placebo group, four (44%) of nine in the 3 ng/mL target steady-state penicillin plasma concentration group, four (44%) of nine in the 6 ng/mL group, none of eight in the 9 ng/mL group, none of eight in the 12 ng/mL group, and none of nine in the 20 ng/mL group. No severe or serious adverse events occurred. Using Bayesian concentration-response modelling, the minimum steady-state plasma concentration of penicillin for which 90% of participants would avoid clinical pharyngitis was 8·1 ng/mL (95% credible interval 6·1-10·9). When steady-state penicillin concentrations are greater than 9 ng/mL, few people will develop experimental emm75 S pyogenes pharyngitis. These data will inform efforts to improve long-acting penicillin preparations and dosage regimens to prevent recurrent rheumatic fever and rheumatic heart disease. The National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia.

Edaravone is one of two main drugs for treating motor neurone disease (MND). This review proposes a specific quality target product profile (QTPP) for edaravone following an appraisal of the issues accounting for the poor clinical uptake of the approved IV and oral liquid edaravone formulations. This is followed by a review of the alternative oral formulations of edaravone described in the published patent and journal literature against the QTPP. A total of 14 texts published by six research groups on 18 novel oral formulations of edaravone for the treatment of MND have been reviewed. The alternative oral formulations included liquid and solid formulations developed with cyclodextrins, lipids, surfactants, co-surfactants, alkalising agents, tablet excipients, and co-solvents. Most were intended to deliver edaravone for drug absorption in the lower gastrointestinal tract (GIT); however, there were also four formulations targeting the oral mucosal absorption of edaravone to avoid first-pass metabolism. All the novel formulations improved the aqueous solubility, stability, and oral bioavailability (BA) of edaravone compared to an aqueous suspension of edaravone. A common limitation of the published formulations is the lack of MND-patient-centred data. Except for TW001, no other formulations have been trialled in MND patients. To meet the QTPP of an oral edaravone formulation for MND patients, it is recommended that a tablet of appropriate size and with acceptable taste and stability be designed for the effective sublingual or buccal absorption of edaravone. This tablet should be designed with input from the MND community.