Objective: To compare the clinical symptomatology in patients with Early‐Onset Schizophrenia (EOS, N = 176), especially the subgroup Very Early Onset Schizophrenia (VEOS) and Adult Onset Schizophrenia (AOS, N = 551).Method: In a large French multicentric sample, 727 stable schizophrenia patients, classified by age at onset of the disorder, were assessed using standardized and extensive clinical and neuropsychological batteries: AOS with onset ≥ 18 years and EOS with onset < 18 years (including 22 VEOS < 13 years).Results: The importance of better diagnosing EOS group, and in particularly VEOS, appeared in a longer DUP Duration of Untreated Psychosis (respectively, 2.6 years ± 4.1 and 8.1 years ± 5.7 vs. 1.0 years ± 2.5), more severe symptomatology (PANSS Positive And Negative Syndrome Scale scores), and lower educational level than the AOS group. In addition, the VEOS subgroup had a more frequent childhood history of learning disabilities and lower prevalence of right‐handedness quotient than the AOS.Conclusion: The study demonstrates the existence of an increased gradient of clinical severity from AOS to VEOS. In order to improve the prognosis of the early forms of schizophrenia and to reduce the DUP, clinicians need to pay attention to the prodromal manifestations of the disease.

Background: The terrorist attack at Westminster Bridge on March 22^nd, 2017 impacted on French high school students on a school trip in London. This terrorist attack was claimed by the Islamic State. The aim of the study was to assess the mental health consequences of the attack on the French adolescents who were directly exposed (criteria A for Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder, PTSD). This involved three dimensions, namely: (1) clinical; (2) epidemiological; and (3) prevention and therapeutic.Material and Method: The investigation was the first observational step of AVAL (Adolescents Victimes de l'Attentat de Londres) study, a cohort monitoring project and it was then a monocentric, cross sectional, non interventional survey, at only one-year post-trauma. The study was carried out utilizing self- and clinician-administered questionnaires. Volunteers from the medico-psychological emergency unit provided support for these victims during the study protocol.Results: From the target population (n = 53), 39 adolescents (73.6%) agreed to participate, with a median age 16.9 years. 12 months after the attack, 25.6% of teenagers suffered from current PTSD (p < 0.0001). Those with, vs. without, PTSD showed several significant differences: (1) heightened levels of major depressive episodes (p = 0.0266) and suicidality (p = 0.0164); (2) increased substance use, including tobacco (p = 0.0284) and cannabis (p = 0.0449); and (3) impaired functioning in school (p = 0.0203), social (p < 0.0001) and family (p < 0.0001) settings. Sixty four percentage of directly exposed teenagers also had a current psychiatric disorder other than PTSD.Discussion: The heightened levels of PTSD, psychiatric disorders, and substance use at 12 months highlight the importance of early intervention in adolescents exposed to terrorist-linked potentially traumatic events.

Contexte : Autisme, trouble du spectre autistique, schizophrénies précoces voire même très précoces (SDTP)... autant de termes utilisés de nos jours! Même si les classifications restent aujourd'hui catégorielles, les travaux sont cependant croissants pour approfondir et comprendre un éventuel lien entre les troubles du spectre autistique et schizophrénique, et notamment un lien entre les troubles du spectre autistique (TSA) et les schizophrénies précoces. Objectif : Clarifier les liens cliniques et biologiques entre TSA et schizophrénies à début précoce (avant 18 ans) et même très précoce (avant 13 ans). Méthodologie: Population de 62 sujets, divisés en trois groupes selon l'âge de début de la pathologie schizophrénique : strictement avant 13 ans (Very Early Onset Schizophrenia, VEOS), entre 13 et 18 ans (Early Onset Schizophrenia, EOS) et supérieur ou égal à 18 ans (Adult Onset Schizophrenia, AOS). Pour chaque groupe, 2 évaluations cliniques sont effectuées : recherche d'antécédents prémorbides autistiques avec l'ADI-R (Autism Diagnostic Interview-Revised); l'autre phénotypique avec MINI (Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview), BPRS (Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale), PANSS (Positive And Negative Symptoms Scale for schizophrenia), STAI (State Trait Anxiety Inventory), TAS (Toronto Alexithymia Scale) et NSS (Neurological Soft Signs). L'analyse biologique est basée sur des mesures du cycle du cortisol salivaire (jour 1: 8h00; 11h00; 16h00; 24h00 et jour 2 :8h00), afin d'évaluer la réponse au stress de l'axe hypothalamo-hypophyso-surrenalien. Résultats: un gradient des troubles VEOS > EOS > AOS apparaît. Plus la schizophrénie semble débuter tôt et plus sont retrouvés des antécédents prémorbides autistiques et une réactivité au stress, réponse également exacerbée chez les apparentés. Conclusion: Un lien clinico-biologique apparaît donc entre SDTP et TSA, avec notamment des troubles cliniques déjà présents avant trois ans et des anomalies de la réponse au stress. Les schizophrénies à début très précoce sont-elles ainsi à distinguer dans le grand ensemble des schizophrénies? En tout cas, un diagnostic à mieux connaître, afin de mieux le prendre en charge et de mieux accompagner patients et famille.

Background: The care environment significantly influences the experiences of patients with severe mental illness and the quality of their care. While a welcoming and stimulating environment enhances patient satisfaction and health outcomes, psychiatric facilities often prioritize staff workflow over patient needs. Addressing these challenges is crucial to improving patient experiences and outcomes in mental health care. Objective: This study is part of the Patient-Reported Experience Measure for Improving Quality of Care in Mental Health (PREMIUM) project and aims to establish an item bank (PREMIUM-CE) and to develop computerized adaptive tests (CATs) to measure the experience of the care environment of adult patients with schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, or major depressive disorder. Methods: We performed psychometric analyses including assessments of item response theory (IRT) model assumptions, IRT model fit, differential item functioning (DIF), item bank validity, and CAT simulations. Results: In this multicenter cross-sectional study, 498 patients were recruited from outpatient and inpatient settings. The final PREMIUM-CE 13-item bank was sufficiently unidimensional (root mean square error of approximation=0.082, 95% CI 0.067-0.097; comparative fit index=0.974; Tucker-Lewis index=0.968) and showed an adequate fit to the IRT model (infit mean square statistic ranging between 0.7 and 1.0). DIF analysis revealed no item biases according to gender, health care settings, diagnosis, or mode of study participation. PREMIUM-CE scores correlated strongly with satisfaction measures (r=0.69-0.78; P<.001) and weakly with quality-of-life measures (r=0.11-0.21; P<.001). CAT simulations showed a strong correlation (r=0.98) between CAT scores and those of the full item bank, and around 79.5% (396/498) of the participants obtained a reliable score with the administration of an average of 7 items. Conclusions: The PREMIUM-CE item bank and its CAT version have shown excellent psychometric properties, making them reliable measures for evaluating the patient experience of the care environment among adults with severe mental illness in both outpatient and inpatient settings. These measures are a valuable addition to the existing landscape of patient experience assessment, capturing what truly matters to patients and enhancing the understanding of their care experiences. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02491866; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT02491866