Roland Thijs

Dr. Roland Thijs


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

29Years (1998-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
4 October 2016 in Neurology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
ASAgnes van Sonderen
Agnes van Sonderen
RTRoland Thijs
Roland Thijs
ECElias C. Coenders
Elias C. Coenders
LJLize C. Jiskoot
Lize C. Jiskoot
ESEsther Sanchez
Esther Sanchez
MTMaarten J. Titulaer
Maarten J. Titulaer
Objective: This nationwide study gives a detailed description of the clinical features and long-term outcome of anti–leucine-rich glioma-inactivated 1 (LGI1) encephalitis. Methods: We collected patients prospectively from October 2013, and retrospectively from samples sent to our laboratory from January 2007. LGI1 antibodies were confirmed with both cell-based assay and immunohistochemistry. Clinical information was obtained in interviews with patients and their relatives and from medical records. Initial MRI and follow-up MRI were revised blindly. Neuropsychological assessment was performed in those patients with follow-up over 2 years. Results: Annual incidence in the Netherlands was 0.83/million. A total of 34/38 patients had a limbic encephalitis. Subtle focal seizures (66%, autonomic or dyscognitive) and faciobrachial dystonic seizures (FBDS, 47%) mostly occurred before onset of memory disturbance. Later in the disease course, 63% had tonic-clonic seizures. Initial MRI showed hippocampal T2 hyperintensity in 74% of the patients. These lesions evolved regularly into mesial temporal sclerosis (44%). Substantial response to immunotherapy was seen in 80%, with early response of seizures and slow recovery of cognition. At follow-up ≥2 years, most surviving patients reported mild residual cognitive deficit with spatial disorientation. A total of 86% had persistent amnesia for the disease period. Relapses were common (35%) and presented up to 8 years after initial disease. Two-year case fatality rate was 19%. Conclusions: Anti-LGI1 encephalitis is a homogenous clinical syndrome, showing early FBDS and other focal seizures with subtle clinical manifestations, followed by memory disturbances. Better recognition will lead to earlier diagnosis, essential for prompt start of treatment. Long-term outcome of surviving patients is mostly favorable, but relapses are common.

11 August 2009 in Nature Reviews Neurology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
RSRainer Surges
Rainer Surges
RTRoland Thijs
Roland Thijs
HTHanno L. Tan
Hanno L. Tan
JSJosemir W. Sander
Josemir W. Sander

22 December 2011 in Epilepsia
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
RLRobert J. Lamberts
Robert J. Lamberts
RTRoland Thijs
Roland Thijs
ALAoife Laffan
Aoife Laffan
YLYvonne Langan
Yvonne Langan
JSJosemir W. Sander
Josemir W. Sander
Summary: Purpose:  Most people with epilepsy who die suddenly and whose death is attributed to sudden unexpected death in epilepsy (SUDEP) are found in or by the bed for unknown reasons. We assessed whether those with sleep‐related SUDEP were more likely to have nocturnal seizures, and whether seizure patterns (diurnal vs. nocturnal) differed from people dying suddenly and living controls with epilepsy.Methods:  Seizure patterns in a cohort of 154 people with epilepsy who died suddenly and after autopsy conformed to the definition of SUDEP and 616 controls living with epilepsy were classified as having “exclusively diurnal” or “nocturnal seizures.” Comparisons were made between the groups. SUDEP was classified as sleep‐related or non–sleep‐related based on eyewitness accounts and the circumstances surrounding death.Key Findings:  SUDEP was primarily a sleep‐related (58%) and unwitnessed (86%) event. If sleep‐related, SUDEP was more likely to be unwitnessed [odds ratio (OR) 4.4, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.6–12]. Those with sleep‐related SUDEP were more likely to have a history of nocturnal seizures than those who had non–sleep‐related SUDEP (OR 3.6, 95% CI 1.4–9.4). Those who died were more likely to have a history of nocturnal seizures than living controls (OR 3.9, 95% CI 2.5–6.0). After correction for previously established SUDEP risk factors (Langan et al., 2005), the presence of nocturnal seizures remained significant (OR 2.6, 95% CI 1.3–5.0).Significance:  Nocturnal seizures seem to be an independent risk factor for SUDEP. These findings underscore the importance of preventive measures, which may include night supervision.

13 July 2022 in The Lancet Neurology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
WWWouter Wieling
Wouter Wieling
HKHoracio Kaufmann
Horacio Kaufmann
VCVictoria E Claydon
Victoria E Claydon
VWVeera K van Wijnen
Veera K van Wijnen
MHMark P M Harms
Mark P M Harms
RTRoland Thijs
Roland Thijs

8 July 2009 in Brain
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
WWWouter Wieling
Wouter Wieling
RTRoland Thijs
Roland Thijs
NDN. van Dijk
N. van Dijk
AWArthur A. M. Wilde
Arthur A. M. Wilde
DBDavid G. Benditt
David G. Benditt
JDJ. Gert van Dijk
J. Gert van Dijk
Detailed history taking is of paramount importance to establish a reliable diagnosis in patients with transient loss of consciousness. In this article the clinical symptoms and signs of the successive phases of a syncopal episode are reviewed. A failure of the systemic circulation to perfuse the brain sufficiently results in a stereotyped progression of neurological symptoms and signs culminating in loss of consciousness; when transient, this is syncope. Prior to loss of consciousness the affected individual tends to exhibit unclear thinking, followed by fixation of the eyes in the midline and a ‘frozen’ appearance. Narrowing of the field of vision with loss of colour vision (‘greying’ out) and finally a complete loss of vision (hence ‘blacking’ out) occurs. Hearing loss may occur following loss of vision. This process may take as little as ∼7 s in cases of sudden complete circulatory arrest (e.g. abrupt asystole), but in other circumstances it may take longer depending on the rate and depth of cerebral hypoperfusion. Complete loss of consciousness occurs with the ‘turning up’ of the eyeballs. Profound cerebral hypoperfusion may be accompanied by myoclonic jerks.

1 November 2016 in Epilepsy & Behavior
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
SSSharon Shmuely
Sharon Shmuely
SSSanjay M. Sisodiya
Sanjay M. Sisodiya
WGW. Boudewijn Gunning
W. Boudewijn Gunning
JSJosemir W. Sander
Josemir W. Sander
RTRoland Thijs
Roland Thijs
Premature mortality is a major issue in Dravet syndrome (DS). To improve understanding of DS premature mortality, we conducted a comprehensive literature search with a particular emphasis on SUDEP. We searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane, CENTRAL, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Academic Search Premier, and ScienceDirect on the following terms: "Dravet syndrome", "severe myoclonic epilepsy", "SMEI", "mortality", "survivors", "prognosis", and "death". DS cases or cohorts studies reporting mortality were included. The search yielded 676 articles and 86 meeting abstracts. After removing duplicates and screening titles and abstracts, full text of 73 articles was reviewed. Only 28 articles and six meeting abstracts met inclusion criteria. Five articles and four meeting abstracts were excluded, as the case(s) were also described elsewhere. After checking the references, five additional studies were included. The 30 items reported 177 unique cases. Sudden unexpected death in epilepsy was the likely cause in nearly half of the cases (n=87, 49%), followed by status epilepticus (n=56, 32%). Drowning or accidental death was reported in 14 cases (8%), infections in 9 (5%), other causes in six (3%), and unknown in five (3%). Age at death was reported for 142 of the 177 cases (80%), with a mean age of 8.7±9.8years (SD); 73% died before the age of 10years. Dravet syndrome is characterized by high epilepsy-related premature mortality and a marked young age at death. Sudden unexpected death in epilepsy is the leading reported cause of death in DS, accounting for nearly half of all deaths. The cause of this excess mortality remains elusive but may be explained by epilepsy severity, as well as genetic susceptibility to SUDEP.