To evaluate the clinical efficacy of oblique lateral interbody fusion combined posterior percutaneous pedicle screw fixation in the treatment of single segment lumbar tuberculosis. Patients who underwent surgical treatment for single segment lumbar tuberculosis from 2015 to 2018 in our department were retrospectively included in this study. The included patients were divided into two groups, namely oblique lateral interbody fusion combined percutaneous pedicle screw fixation (OLIF) group and traditional posterior transforaminal or transpedicular approach debridement and pedicle screws fixation (PTA) group, according to the surgical methods. Outcomes including operative time, operative blood loss, hospital stay, visual analogue scale (VAS) score, Oswestry disability index (ODI), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), C reactive protein (CRP), Cobb angle correction and loss, bone fusion time, ASIA grade and complications were all recorded and compared. A total of 60 patients were included in this study, involving 23 patients in the OLIF group and 37 patients in the PTA group. The OLIF group had less operative time, blood loss and shorter hospital stay compared with the PTA group (P < 0.05). Both the two groups achieved significant improvements in ESR, CRP and ASIA grade at the last follow-up (P < 0.05), but no significant differences were found between them (P>0.05). There were no significant differences in Cobb angle correction and loss between the two groups (P > 0.05), but the bone graft fusion time of the OLIF group was significantly shorter than the PTA group (P < 0.05). The two groups achieved similar improvement in VAS score and ODI at 12 months postoperative and the last follow-up, however, OLIF group had a lower VAS score and ODI at 1 month, 3 months and 6 months postoperative (P < 0.05). No significant difference was found in complications between the two groups (P > 0.05) and all patients were cured after active treatment. Both OLIF and PTA can achieve satisfactory clinical efficacy in the surgical treatment of single segment lumbar TB, but OLIF has the advantages of less surgical trauma, faster postoperative recovery and shorter bone fusion time.

Midazolam has some potential in pain control of patients undergoing knee arthroscopy. However, the results remain controversial. We conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to explore the effect of midazolam on pain control after knee arthroscopy. PubMed, EMbase, Web of science, EBSCO, and Cochrane library databases are systematically searched. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the effect of midazolam on pain management after knee arthroscopy are included. Two investigators have independently searched articles, extracted the data, and assessed the quality of the included studies. This meta-analysis is performed using the random-effect model. Six RCTs are included in this meta-analysis. Compared with control intervention after knee arthroscopy, midazolam intervention can significantly reduce the pain scores (standard mean difference (Std. MD) = − 3.70; 95% confidence interval (CI) = − 6.81 to − 0.60; P = 0.02), the number of patients requiring analgesics (risk ratio (RR) = 0.66; 95% CI = 0.49 to 0.88; P = 0.005), and analgesic consumption (Std. MD = −1.62; 95% CI = − 3.04 to − 0.19; P = 0.03), as well as increase the time to first analgesic requirement (Std. MD = 1.58; 95% CI = 0.17 to 2.99; P = 0.03). In addition, midazolam intervention results in no increase in adverse events following knee arthroscopy (RR = 0.74; 95% CI = 0.18 to 2.98; P = 0.67). Midazolam intervention is revealed to substantially reduce the pain scores, the number of patients requiring analgesics, and analgesic consumption, as well as improve the time to first analgesic requirement after knee arthroscopy.

Circulating adiponectin shows some relationships with the occurrence of cardiometabolic diseases and osteoporotic fracture, but little is known about their causal associations. This two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) study aims to explore the causal roles of circulating adiponectin in cardiometabolic diseases and osteoporotic fracture. We used 15 single nucleotide polymorphisms associated with circulating adiponectin as the instrumental variables. Inverse variance weighted, weighted median and MR-Egger regression methods were applied to study the causal associations. The results found that high circulating adiponectin was causally associated with reduced risk of type 2 diabetes (beta-estimate: −0.030, 95% CI: −0.048 to −0.011, SE: 0.009, P-value = 0.002) and may be the risk factor of coronary artery disease (beta-estimate: 0.012, 95% CI: 0.001 to 0.023, SE: 0.006, P-value = 0.030). No causal associations were seen between circulating adiponectin and other outcomes including heart failure, atrial fibrillation, cerebral ischemia, intracerebral hemorrhage or osteoporotic fracture. This study found the potential causal roles of high circulating adiponectin in reduced risk of type 2 diabetes and increased risk of coronary artery disease, which may help prevent and treat these two diseases.

Introduction: The efficacy of intravenous fluid supplementation for neonatal hyperbilirubinemia remains controversial. We conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to explore the influence of intravenous fluid supplementation on treatment efficacy of neonatal hyperbilirubinemia. Methods: We search PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, EBSCO, and Cochrane Library databases through June 2019 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the efficacy of intravenous fluid supplementation for neonatal hyperbilirubinemia. This meta-analysis is performed using the random-effect model. Results: Six RCTs are included in the meta-analysis. Overall, compared with control group for neonatal hyperbilirubinemia, intravenous fluid supplementation is associated with decreased TSB at 8 h (std. MD = −0.82; 95% CI = −1.46 to −0.17; p = .01), 12 h (std. MD = −0.46; 95% CI = −0.81 to −0.10; p = .01), 24 h (std. MD = −0.47; 95% CI = −0.78 to −0.16; p = .003) and 36 h (std. MD = −0.37; 95% CI = −0.73 to −0.02; p = .04), as well as reduced incidence of exchange transfusion (RR = 0.29; 95% CI = 0.14–0.59; p = .0006), but has no significant impact on duration of phototherapy (std. MD = −0.34; 95% CI = −0.88–0.21; p = .22). Conclusions: Intravenous fluid supplementation can provide additional benefits for the treatment of neonatal hyperbilirubinemia.

Objective. Spinal tuberculosis (TB) misdiagnosed of spinal metastasis was not rarely reported, especially in outpatients department. This study was aimed to establish an outpatient scoring system to preliminarily distinguish spinal metastasis from spinal TB. Methods. We retrospectively reviewed consecutive 141 patients with a pathological diagnosis of spinal metastasis (82 cases) or spinal TB (59 cases) in our hospital from January 2017 to June 2018. The following clinical characteristics which can be obtained by outpatient orthopedist were recorded and analyzed: age, gender, malignant tumor history, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), C-reactive protein (CRP), and imaging features including distribution characteristics of vertebral lesions, subligamentous spread, paravertebral or psoas abscess, involved vertebral element, intervertebral disc, and sequestra formation. The prevalence of clinical characteristics in spinal metastasis was evaluated, and the scoring system was established using logistic regression analysis. The performance of the scoring system was also prospectively validated. Results. The outpatient scoring system was based on five clinical characteristics confirmed as significant predictors of spinal metastasis, namely, malignant tumor history, subligamentous spread, posterior element lesions, preserved discs, and no sequestra formation. Spinal metastasis showed a significant higher score than spinal TB (8.17 points vs. 1.97 points, $t=18.621$ , $P<0.001$ ), and the optimal cut-off value for the scoring system was 5 points. The sensitivity and specificity of the scoring system for predicting spinal metastasis were 97.85% and 88.33%, respectively, in the validation set. Conclusion. Spinal lesions with the score of 5 to 10 would be considered a diagnosis of spinal metastasis, while the score of 0 to 4 may be spinal TB. Because the scoring system is mainly based on the clinical characteristics that can be obtained by an outpatient orthopedist, it is suitable to be used as a diagnostic tool in the outpatient department.