Daniel Barboriak

Dr. Daniel Barboriak


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

28Years (1999-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
20 November 2023 in Journal of Clinical Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PWPatrick Y. Wen
Patrick Y. Wen
MBMartin J. Van Den Bent
Martin J. Van Den Bent
GYGilbert Youssef
Gilbert Youssef
TCTimothy F Cloughesy
Timothy F Cloughesy
BEBenjamin M. Ellingson
Benjamin M. Ellingson
SCSusan M. Chang
Susan M. Chang
PURPOSE: The Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) criteria for high-grade gliomas (RANO-HGG) and low-grade gliomas (RANO-LGG) were developed to improve reliability of response assessment in glioma trials. Over time, some limitations of these criteria were identified, and challenges emerged regarding integrating features of the modified RANO (mRANO) or the immunotherapy RANO (iRANO) criteria. METHODS: Informed by data from studies evaluating the different criteria, updates to the RANO criteria are proposed (RANO 2.0). RESULTS: We recommend a standard set of criteria for both high- and low-grade gliomas, to be used for all trials regardless of the treatment modalities being evaluated. In the newly diagnosed setting, the postradiotherapy magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), rather than the postsurgical MRI, will be used as the baseline for comparison with subsequent scans. Since the incidence of pseudoprogression is high in the 12 weeks after radiotherapy, continuation of treatment and confirmation of progression during this period with a repeat MRI, or histopathologic evidence of unequivocal recurrent tumor, are required to define tumor progression. However, confirmation scans are not mandatory after this period nor for the evaluation of treatment for recurrent tumors. For treatments with a high likelihood of pseudoprogression, mandatory confirmation of progression with a repeat MRI is highly recommended. The primary measurement remains the maximum cross-sectional area of tumor (two-dimensional) but volumetric measurements are an option. For IDH wild-type glioblastoma, the nonenhancing disease will no longer be evaluated except when assessing response to antiangiogenic agents. In IDH-mutated tumors with a significant nonenhancing component, clinical trials may require evaluating both the enhancing and nonenhancing tumor components for response assessment. CONCLUSION: The revised RANO 2.0 criteria refine response assessment in gliomas.

29 September 2020 in Neuro-Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JBJerrold Boxerman
Jerrold Boxerman
CQChad C Quarles
Chad C Quarles
LHLeland S Hu
Leland S Hu
BEBradley J Erickson
Bradley J Erickson
EGElizabeth R Gerstner
Elizabeth R Gerstner
CHChas Haynes
Chas Haynes
Despite the widespread clinical use of dynamic susceptibility contrast (DSC) MRI, DSC-MRI methodology has not been standardized, hindering its utilization for response assessment in multicenter trials. Recently, the DSC-MRI Standardization Subcommittee of the Jumpstarting Brain Tumor Drug Development Coalition issued an updated consensus DSC-MRI protocol compatible with the standardized brain tumor imaging protocol (BTIP) for high-grade gliomas that is increasingly used in the clinical setting and is the default MRI protocol for the National Clinical Trials Network. After reviewing the basis for controversy over DSC-MRI protocols, this paper provides evidence-based best practices for clinical DSC-MRI as determined by the Committee, including pulse sequence (gradient echo vs spin echo), BTIP-compliant contrast agent dosing (preload and bolus), flip angle (FA), echo time (TE), and post-processing leakage correction. In summary, full-dose preload, full-dose bolus dosing using intermediate (60°) FA and field strength-dependent TE (40–50 ms at 1.5 T, 20–35 ms at 3 T) provides overall best accuracy and precision for cerebral blood volume estimates. When single-dose contrast agent usage is desired, no-preload, full-dose bolus dosing using low FA (30°) and field strength-dependent TE provides excellent performance, with reduced contrast agent usage and elimination of potential systematic errors introduced by variations in preload dose and incubation time.

1 April 2008 in American Journal of Roentgenology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JPJames M. Provenzale
James M. Provenzale
DBDaniel Barboriak
Daniel Barboriak
KVKevan VanLandingham
Kevan VanLandingham
JMJames MacFall
James MacFall
DDDavid Delong
David Delong
DLDarrell V. Lewis
Darrell V. Lewis
OBJECTIVE. The objective of our study was to test the hypothesis that the finding of hyperintense hippocampal signal intensity on T2-weighted MR images soon after febrile status epilepticus is associated with subsequent hippocampal volume loss and persistent abnormal signal intensity on T2-weighted images (i.e., mesial temporal sclerosis).SUBJECTS AND METHODS. Eleven children (mean age, 25 months) underwent initial MRI that included coronal temporal lobe imaging within 72 hours of febrile status epilepticus and follow-up imaging from 3 to 23 months later (mean, 9 months). A neuroradiologist blinded to clinical history graded initial and follow-up hippocampal signal intensity on a scale from 0 (normal) to 4 (markedly increased). Two blinded observers measured hippocampal volumes on initial and follow-up MR studies using commercially available software and volumes from 30 healthy children (mean age, 6.3 years). Initial signal intensity and hippocampal volume changes were compared using Kendall tau correlati...

2 February 2015 in Neuro-Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
KSKathleen Schmainda
Kathleen Schmainda
ZZZheng Zhang
Zheng Zhang
MPMelissa Prah
Melissa Prah
BSBradley S. Snyder
Bradley S. Snyder
MGMark R. Gilbert
Mark R. Gilbert
JBJerrold L. Boxerman
Jerrold L. Boxerman
The study goal was to determine whether changes in relative cerebral blood volume (rCBV) derived from dynamic susceptibility contrast (DSC) MRI are predictive of overall survival (OS) in patients with recurrent glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) when measured 2, 8, and 16 weeks after treatment initiation. Patients with recurrent GBM (37/123) enrolled in ACRIN 6677/RTOG 0625, a multicenter, randomized, phase II trial of bevacizumab with irinotecan or temozolomide, consented to DSC-MRI plus conventional MRI, 21 with DSC-MRI at baseline and at least 1 postbaseline scan. Contrast-enhancing regions of interest were determined semi-automatically using pre- and postcontrast T1-weighted images. Mean tumor rCBV normalized to white matter (nRCBV) and standardized rCBV (sRCBV) were determined for these regions of interest. The OS rates for patients with positive versus negative changes from baseline in nRCBV and sRCBV were compared using Wilcoxon rank-sum and Kaplan–Meier survival estimates with log-rank tests. Patients surviving at least 1 year (OS-1) had significantly larger decreases in nRCBV at week 2 (P = .0451) and sRCBV at week 16 (P = .014). Receiver operating characteristic analysis found the percent changes of nRCBV and sRCBV at week 2 and sRCBV at week 16, but not rCBV data at week 8, to be good prognostic markers for OS-1. Patients with positive change from baseline rCBV had significantly shorter OS than those with negative change at both week 2 and week 16 (P = .0015 and P = .0067 for nRCBV and P = .0251 and P = .0004 for sRCBV, respectively). Early decreases in rCBV are predictive of improved survival in patients with recurrent GBM treated with bevacizumab.

1 September 2011 in Neurosurgery
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JSJohn H. Sampson
John H. Sampson
MBMartin Brady
Martin Brady
RRRaghu Raghavan
Raghu Raghavan
AMAnkit I Mehta
Ankit I Mehta
AFAllan H Friedman
Allan H Friedman
DBDarell D Bigner
Darell D Bigner
BACKGROUND:. Convection-enhanced delivery (CED) permits site-specific therapeutic drug delivery within interstitial spaces at increased dosages through

1 January 2002
Verified
Book Chapter
Closed access
DLDarrell V. Lewis
Darrell V. Lewis
DBDaniel Barboriak
Daniel Barboriak
JMJames R. MacFall
James R. MacFall
JPJames M. Provenzale
James M. Provenzale
TMTeresa V. Mitchell
Teresa V. Mitchell
KVKevan E. VanLandingham
Kevan E. VanLandingham