Mark L Chiu

Dr. Mark L Chiu

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

36Years (1991-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
2 March 2011 in Nature
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
IWIngrid E. Wertz
Ingrid E. Wertz
SKSaritha Kusam
Saritha Kusam
CLCynthia Lam
Cynthia Lam
TOToru Okamoto
Toru Okamoto
WSWendy Sandoval
Wendy Sandoval
VDVishva M. Dixit
Vishva M. Dixit

3 December 2019 in Antibodies
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MCMark L Chiu
Mark L Chiu
DGDennis Goulet
Dennis Goulet
ATAlexey Teplyakov
Alexey Teplyakov
GGGary Gilliland
Gary Gilliland
Antibodies and antibody-derived macromolecules have established themselves as the mainstay in protein-based therapeutic molecules (biologics). Our knowledge of the structure–function relationships of antibodies provides a platform for protein engineering that has been exploited to generate a wide range of biologics for a host of therapeutic indications. In this review, our basic understanding of the antibody structure is described along with how that knowledge has leveraged the engineering of antibody and antibody-related therapeutics having the appropriate antigen affinity, effector function, and biophysical properties. The platforms examined include the development of antibodies, antibody fragments, bispecific antibody, and antibody fusion products, whose efficacy and manufacturability can be improved via humanization, affinity modulation, and stability enhancement. We also review the design and selection of binding arms, and avidity modulation. Different strategies of preparing bispecific and multispecific molecules for an array of therapeutic applications are included.

30 June 2016 in Cancer Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
SMSheri L. Moores
Sheri L. Moores
MCMark L Chiu
Mark L Chiu
BBBarbara S. Bushey
Barbara S. Bushey
KCKristen Chevalier
Kristen Chevalier
LLLeopoldo Luistro
Leopoldo Luistro
GAG. Mark Anderson
G. Mark Anderson
Non–small cell lung cancers (NSCLC) with activating EGFR mutations become resistant to tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI), often through second-site mutations in EGFR (T790M) and/or activation of the cMet pathway. We engineered a bispecific EGFR-cMet antibody (JNJ-61186372) with multiple mechanisms of action to inhibit primary/secondary EGFR mutations and the cMet pathway. JNJ-61186372 blocked ligand-induced phosphorylation of EGFR and cMet and inhibited phospho-ERK and phospho-AKT more potently than the combination of single receptor–binding antibodies. In NSCLC tumor models driven by EGFR and/or cMet, JNJ-61186372 treatment resulted in tumor regression through inhibition of signaling/receptor downmodulation and Fc-driven effector interactions. Complete and durable regression of human lung xenograft tumors was observed with the combination of JNJ-61186372 and a third-generation EGFR TKI. Interestingly, treatment of cynomolgus monkeys with JNJ-61186372 resulted in no major toxicities, including absence of skin rash observed with other EGFR-directed agents. These results highlight the differentiated potential of JNJ-61186372 to inhibit the spectrum of mutations driving EGFR TKI resistance in NSCLC. Cancer Res; 76(13); 3942–53. ©2016 AACR.

1 January 2021 in Journal of Biological Chemistry
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
JNJoost Neijssen
Joost Neijssen
RCRosa M.F. Cardoso
Rosa M.F. Cardoso
KCKristen M. Chevalier
Kristen M. Chevalier
LWLuus Wiegman
Luus Wiegman
TVThomas Valerius
Thomas Valerius
MCMark L Chiu
Mark L Chiu
A bispecific antibody (BsAb) targeting the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and mesenchymal-epithelial transition factor (MET) pathways represents a novel approach to overcome resistance to targeted therapies in patients with non-small cell lung cancer. In this study, we sequentially screened a panel of BsAbs in a combinatorial approach to select the optimal bispecific molecule. The BsAbs were derived from different EGFR and MET parental monoclonal antibodies (mAbs). Initially, molecules were screened for EGFR and MET binding on tumor cell lines and lack of agonistic activity towards MET. Hits were identified and further screened based on their potential to induce untoward cell proliferation and cross-phosphorylation of EGFR by MET via receptor colocalization in the absence of ligand. After the final step, we selected the EGFR and MET arms for the lead BsAb and added low fucose Fc engineering to generate amivantamab (JNJ-61186372). The crystal structure of the anti-MET Fab of amivantamab bound to MET was solved and elucidated the interaction between the two molecules in atomic details. Amivantamab antagonized the hepatocyte growth factor (HGF)-induced signaling by binding to MET Sema domain and thereby blocking HGF β-chain - Sema engagement. The amivantamab EGFR epitope was mapped to EGFR domain III and residues K443, K465, I467, and S468. Furthermore, amivantamab showed superior antitumor activity over small molecule EGFR and MET inhibitors in the HCC827-HGF in vivo model. Based on its unique mode of action, amivantamab may provide benefit to patients with malignancies associated with aberrant EGFR and MET signaling.

1 June 2016 in Current Opinion in Structural Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
MCMark L Chiu
Mark L Chiu
GGGary L Gilliland
Gary L Gilliland
The successful introduction of antibody-based protein therapeutics into the arsenal of treatments for patients has within a few decades fostered intense innovation in the production and engineering of antibodies. Reviewed here are the methods currently used to produce antibodies along with how our knowledge of the structural and functional characterization of immunoglobulins has resulted in the engineering of antibodies to produce protein therapeutics with unique properties, both biological and biophysical, that are leading to novel therapeutic approaches. Antibody engineering includes the introduction of the antibody combining site (variable regions) into a host of architectures including bi and multi-specific formats that further impact the therapeutic properties leading to further advantages and successes in patient treatment.

1 January 1998 in Journal of Structural Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
GRGabriele Rummel
Gabriele Rummel
AHAriane Hardmeyer
Ariane Hardmeyer
CWChristine Widmer
Christine Widmer
MCMark L Chiu
Mark L Chiu
PNPeter Nollert
Peter Nollert
JRJurg P. Rosenbusch
Jurg P. Rosenbusch