The intensification of agriculture has led to the reduction of the diversity of arthropods in agroecosystems, including that of ground-dwelling species. The aim of our work was to assess the effect of a sown cover crop on the diversity of ground-dwelling arthropods, including key predators for pest control in pear orchards. The trial was carried out in a pear orchard divided in three blocks; two treatments (cover-cropping and control) were implemented in each block. A seed mixture of 10 plant species was used in the plots with the sown cover. The densities of ground-dwelling arthropods were sampled using pitfall traps. The ground cover had a significant impact on the diversity and abundance of arthropods. The Shannon–Wiener diversity index was significantly higher for the cover than for the control plots. Several families of spiders (Linyphiidae, Lycosidae), beetles (Carabidae, Staphylinidae) and hymenopterans (Scelionidae) were significantly more abundant in the cover-sown plots. Ants and collembola had a significantly higher abundance in the control plots. Some of these groups arthropods (ants and spiders), are represented by species that may commute between ground and pear trees, having an impact on pest control. The use of cover crops is encouraged to enhance biodiversity in farmlands.

Intensive agriculture has a strong impact on the structure of arthropod communities in soil. Sown covers can contribute to their conservation, especially for generalist predators such as spiders and predatory beetles. The aim of this research was to assess the effect of cover crop management on the abundance and diversity of ground-dwelling arthropods. For this purpose, a three-year experiment was conducted in a pear orchard that was divided into three blocks with two plots each: one with a sown cover of mixed plants from different families, including Boraginaceae, Asteraceae, Apiaceae, Brassicaceae, and Fabaceae, and the other with no cover, in which any spontaneous plants were periodically removed without using herbicides. The abundance of ground-dwelling arthropods was sampled using pitfall traps. The sown cover increased the overall richness of arthropods. Additionally, spiders from the families Lycosidae and Linyphiidae, as well as beetles from the families Carabidae and Staphylinidae, were more abundant in the sown cover. Conversely, detritivores such as collembolans and beetles from the family Tenebrionidae were less abundant in the cover. The abundance of ants was not affected by the type of cover. The sown cover increased the diversity of arthropods in the crop, as well as the abundance of generalist predators.

Bemisia tabaci is a major pest of open-field melons in Mediterranean regions. Combining several species of natural enemies can improve pest control but it can give undesirable results when the species engage in antagonistic interactions. This study evaluated the effectiveness of Deraeocoris serenus, Orius laevigatus, and Eretmocerus eremicus as biological control agents and the interactions among the species. This was assessed with the presence–absence of all three species combined in a full-factorial assay. Each microcosm consisted of a melon plant grown in a 5 L pot enclosed in fine mesh, with each of the eight treatments replicated four times. Whiteflies were counted on three leaves per plant, and natural enemies were counted on the whole plants over six weeks. Basal leaves were taken to the laboratory and observed for the emergence of parasitoids. All three natural enemies independently significantly reduced whitefly numbers. Deraeocoris serenus was the most effective biocontrol agent, achieving whitefly reductions of more than 100-fold compared to the control. In contrast, O. laevigatus and E. eremicus achieved reductions of approximately 2.4-fold and 3.6-fold, respectively. No additive or synergistic effects in whitefly control were observed when two or more natural enemies were combined. Deraeocoris serenus and O. laevigatus were found to engage in mutual antagonistic interactions, and these two predators also interfered with the parasitoid. In addition, E. eremicus was also found to interfere with D. serenus. Understanding such interactions is essential for optimizing the management of natural enemies and improving biological pest control.