Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is characterized by persistently increased pressure in the pulmonary arteries. New defining criteria for the different hemodynamic types of pulmonary hypertension (PH) that occur with left heart disease have been proposed by the task force on PH. After consideration of the changes in the general definition of PH in left heart disease, the proposed hemodynamic definition was: (1) isolated postcapillary PH: pulmonary artery wedge pressure >15 mm Hg and mean pulmonary arterial pressure (mPAP) >20 mm Hg and pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) 15 mm Hg, mPAP >20 mm Hg, and PVR ≥3 WU. Secondary PH is initially reversible, but eventually, it can become fixed because of the remodeling process of the pulmonary vascular system. Limitations in defining both the time for and amount of reversibility lack clarity. We discuss a case of PH as a framework to better understand these key principles in addressing patients' candidacy for heart or heart-lung transplantation. We performed a literature search for all available contemporary data with the following terms: "pulmonary hypertension," "reversal," "Impella 5.5," "temporary mechanical support," and "LVAD" using the National Library of Medicine - PubMed and PubMed Central between 2019 and 2023. A total of 14 published papers were found with these search. From these, 3 addressed the issue of PH and reversibility in the setting of LHD after durable LVAD placement. No papers were found using Impella 5.5 and PH during this timeframe. Given the paucity of data in the field regarding temporary mechanical circulatory support and pulmonary hypertension, we present a case-based discussion to guide the reader in understanding the potential impact of this method in patients with WHO Class 2 Pulmonary hypertension. A 49-year-old woman with a medical history of acute on chronic biventricular systolic and diastolic heart failure, American College of Cardiology stage D, Stevenson profile C, New York Heart Association class IV (ejection fraction 18%) secondary to nonischemic cardiomyopathy after cardiac resynchronization therapy, pulmonary hypertension, bilateral deep vein thrombosis, and segmental pulmonary embolism presented for heart transplant evaluation. Her cardiac output and central hemodynamics were measured, and she was found to have a pulmonary artery (PA) pressure of 78/38 with a mean PA pressure of 51, pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) 30, transpulmonary pressure gradient (TPG) 21, thermodilution cardiac output (CO) 3.35 L/min, and cardiac input (CI) 1.75 L/min/m2. Her PVR was 6.2 WU. Provocative pharmacologic testing for reversibility of PH was performed using sodium nitroprusside, which resulted in a blood pressure of 83/57 (92), heart rate 92/min, and PA pressure of 71/31, with a mean PA pressure of 44 PCWP 22, TPG 22, CO 4.8 L/min, and CI of 2.48 L/min/m2 with a PVR of 4.5 WU. Following this, the patient underwent Impella 5.5 placement through the right axillary artery to optimize afterload reduction and improve end-organ perfusion. Post-Impella hemodynamics on milrinone 0.5 mcg/kg/min demonstrated the following: blood pressure 90/66 (74), heart rate 53/min, and PA pressure of 56/29, with a mean PA pressure of 38, PCWP 24, TPG 14, CO 6 L/min, and CI of 2.9 L/min/m2 with a PVR of 2.3 WU. Left ventricular assist device support with Impella 5.5 is associated with a reduction in mPAP and PVR over weeks to months and thus plays a crucial role as a bridge to transplant. Our case and this review highlights the characteristics of PH resulting from heart failure with reduced ejection fraction and discusses the important clinical issues related to the treatment of these patients. We have shown that left ventricular assist device therapy with Impella 5.5 can effectively reduce left-sided filling pressures and lead to PH improvement. We demonstrate the potential benefits of Impella 5.5 in the management of patients with WHO 2 PH and cardiogenic shock with impaired hemodynamics.

BACKGROUNDOptimizing patients with advanced heart failure before orthotopic heart transplantation (OHT), especially in patients greater than 50 years old, is imperative to achieving successful post-transplant outcomes. Complications are well-described for patients bridged to transplant (BTT) with durable left ventricular assist device (LVAD) support. Given the lack of data available in older recipients after the recent increase in mechanical support use, we felt it crucial to report our center’s one-year outcomes in older recipients after heart transplantation with percutaneously placed Impella 5.5 as a BTT. METHODSForty-nine OHT patients were supported with the Impella 5.5 intended as a bridge between December 2019 and October 2022 at Mayo Clinic in Florida. Data were extracted from the electronic health record at baseline and during their transplant episode of care after Institutional Review Boards approval as exempt for retrospective data collection. RESULTSThirty-eight patients aged 50 or older were supported with Impella 5.5 as BTT. Ten patients underwent heart and kidney transplantation within this cohort. The median age at OHT was 63 (58–68) years, with 32 male (84%) and six female patients (16%). Etiology was divided into ischemic (63%) and non-ischemic cardiomyopathy (37%). The baseline median ejection fraction was 19% (15–24). Most patients were in blood group O (60%), and 50% were diabetic. The average duration of support was 27 days (range 6–94). The median duration of follow-up is 488 days (185–693). For patients that have reached the 1-year follow-up timeframe (22 of 38, 58%), the 1-year post-transplant survival is 95%. CONCLUSIONOur single-center data provides awareness for using the Impella 5.5 percutaneously placed axillary support device in older heart failure patients in cardiogenic shock as a bridge to transplantation. One-year survival outcomes after heart transplantation are excellent despite the older recipient’s age and prolonged pre-transplant support.

Impaired kidney function is often associated with acute decompensation of chronic heart failure and portends a poor prognosis. Unfortunately, current data have demonstrated worse survival in patients with acute kidney injury than in patients with chronic kidney disease during durable LVAD placement as bridge therapy. Furthermore, end-stage heart failure patients undergoing combined heart-kidney transplantation have poorer short- and long-term survival than heart transplants alone. We evaluated the kidney function recovery in our heart failure population awaiting heart transplantation at our institution, supported by temporary Mechanical Circulatory Support (tMCS) with Impella 5.5. The protocol (#22004000) was approved by the Mayo Clinic institutional review board, after which we performed a retrospective review of all patients with acute on chronic heart failure and kidney disease in patients considered for only heart and kidney combined organ transplant and supported by tMCS between January 2020 and February 2021. Hemodynamic and kidney function trends were recorded and analyzed before and after tMCS placement and transplantation. After placement of tMCS, we observed a trend towards improvement in creatinine, Fick cardiac index, mixed venous saturation, and glomerular filtration rate (GFR), which persisted through transplantation and discharge. The average duration of support with tMCS was 16.5 days before organ transplantation. The median pre-tMCS creatinine was 2.1 mg/dL (IQR 1.75–2.3). Median hematocrit at the time of tMCS placement was 32% (IQR 32–34), and the median estimated glomerular filtration rate was 34 mL/min/BSA (34–40). The median GFR improved to 44 mL/min/BSA (IQR 45–51), and serum creatinine improved to 1.5 mg/dL (1.5–1.8) after tMCS. Median discharge creatinine was 1.1 mg/dL (1.19–1.25) with a GFR of 72 (65–74). None of these six patients supported with tMCS required renal replacement therapy after heart transplantation. Early adoption of Impella 5.5 in this patient population resulted in renal recovery without needing renal replacement therapies or dual organ transplantation and should be further evaluated.

Introduction: Hypereosinophilic Syndrome (HES) is a rare disorder characterized by persistent elevation of eosinophils, leading to multi-organ infiltration and damage. Eosinophilic Myocarditis (EM) is one of its severe complications contributing significantly to morbidity and mortality. Herein, we describe the diagnostic and therapeutic challenges of EM, emphasizing the significance of early recognition and multidisciplinary management.Case presentation: A 51-year-old female with a history of EM, heart failure, and peripheral eosinophilia presented with NYHA class 3b symptoms. Laboratory findings revealed elevated peripheral eosinophil count, NT-Pro BNP, and characteristic electrocardiogram abnormalities. Imaging studies confirmed biventricular thrombi and myocardial abnormalities consistent with EM. Treatment involved Solu-Medrol for HES and heparin for ventricular thrombi, leading to initial clinical improvement. However, refractory heart failure necessitated urgent heart transplantation.Discussion: EM, an under-recognized complication of HES, poses diagnostic and management challenges. Management includes standard heart failure treatments, steroids, and emerging therapies like Mepolizumab. Early diagnosis and aggressive management are pivotal for improving outcomes in this rare and potentially fatal condition.Conclusion: Advancements in the detection of complications, surgical management, and therapeutic options have improved outcomes in HES. Ongoing research is essential to further understand and address the diagnostic and therapeutic challenges of HES and EM.

Purpose of review: The field of heart transplantation is a complex practice that combines both science and art to optimize the quality and quantity of an organ transplant recipient's life span. In the current age of Transplant Medicine there are many limiting factors that prevent potentially usable organs to be transplanted in addition to the many unknown factors in assessing the risk of posttransplant complications in a proactive manner. This review focuses on the current state, and potential use, and implementation of artificial intelligence technologies in the field of heart transplantation. Furthermore, the utilization of predictive algorithms to assess donor quality, graft function, posttransplant complications and prediction of high-risk complications will be discussed. Artificial intelligence technologies in the pretransplant population is also explored. Recent findings: Artificial intelligence process use has been increasing over the past decade. Early adoption in radiology and laboratory medicine have shown promise for future applications. Implementation of nascent technologies within the field of transplant medicine remains in its infancy. Cardiac and renal medicine have been recent focuses of large-scale artificial intelligence projects because of the wealth of data, the main limiting factor for producing accurate models. Understanding the true role of artificial intelligence in medicine is key – and has been divided into three areas of focus: data quality, interpretation, and clinical application. These areas allow the clinician to translate problems facing patients into algorithms utilized by data scientists to create solutions, which may provide in-depth analysis and detection of relationships not immediately clear. Although some published data has led to commercial products for cardiac, diabetic, and dermatologic applications -- widespread adoption remains limited to specialized centers. Summary: Artificial intelligence applications with clinically relevant models in transplant medicine have the potential to optimize organ utilization, prediction of complications, and potential pretransplant management, which may mitigate the need for transplant. Further translational projects are under development at major centers, with proof of concepts demonstrating validity and safety in the clinical setting. Limiting factors of infrastructure, expertise, and data availability continue to be addressed. Ongoing efforts for commercialization and large-scale trials will provide a foundation for the development of artificial intelligence applications in transplant medicine.