Bhukya Prakash

Dr. Bhukya Prakash

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

19Years (2008-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
14 February 2021 in Microorganisms
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Shyam PaulShyam Paul
Shyam Paul
RCRudra Nath Chatterjee
Rudra Nath Chatterjee
M.V.L.N. RajuM.V.L.N. Raju
M.V.L.N. Raju
BPBhukya Prakash
Bhukya Prakash
SRSavaram Venkata Rama Rao
Savaram Venkata Rama Rao
AKAlagarsamy Kannan
Alagarsamy Kannan
Gut microbiota plays an important role in the health and performance of the host. Characterizations of gut microbiota, core microbiomes, and microbial networks in different chicken breeds are expected to provide clues for pathogen exclusion, improving performance or feed efficiency. Here, we characterized the gut microbiota of “finishing” chickens (at the end of production life) of indigenous Indian Nicobari, Ghagus, and Aseel breeds, originating from the Nicobari island, coastal India, and the Indian mainland, respectively, as well as a global commercial broiler line, VenCobb 400, using 16S rDNA amplicon sequencing. We found that diversity, as well as richness of microbiota, was higher in indigenous breeds than in the broiler line. Beta diversity analysis indicated the highest overlap between Ghagus and Nicobari breeds and a very low overlap between the broiler line and all indigenous breeds. Linear discriminant analysis effect size (LEfSe) revealed 82 breed- or line-specific phylotype operational taxonomic unit (OTU) level biomarkers. We confirm the presence of breed specific and across-breed core microbiomes. Additionally, we show the existence of breed specific complex microbial networks in all groups. This study provides the first (and comprehensive) insight into the gut microbiota of three indigenous breeds and one commercial broiler line of chickens reared without antimicrobials, and underscores the need to study microbial diversity in other indigenous breeds.

17 March 2022 in Plants
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
BKBhupender Kumar
Bhupender Kumar
SRSujay Rakshit
Sujay Rakshit
SKSonu Kumar
Sonu Kumar
BSBrijesh Kumar Singh
Brijesh Kumar Singh
CLChayanika Lahkar
Chayanika Lahkar
HFHossain Firoz
Hossain Firoz
Several maize breeding programs in India have developed numerous inbred lines but the lines have not been characterized using high-density molecular markers. Here, we studied the molecular diversity, population structure, and linkage disequilibrium (LD) patterns in a panel of 314 tropical normal corn, two sweet corn, and six popcorn inbred lines developed by 17 research centers in India, and 62 normal corn from the International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT). The 384 inbred lines were genotyped with 60,227 polymorphic single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). Most of the pair-wise relative kinship coefficients (58.5%) were equal or close to 0, which suggests the lack of redundancy in the genomic composition in the majority of inbred lines. Genetic distance among most pairs of lines (98.3%) varied from 0.20 to 0.34 as compared with just 1.7% of the pairs of lines that differed by <0.20, which suggests greater genetic variation even among sister lines. The overall average of 17% heterogeneity was observed in the panel indicated the need for further inbreeding in the high heterogeneous genotypes. The mean nucleotide diversity and frequency of polymorphic sites observed in the panel were 0.28 and 0.02, respectively. The model-based population structure, principal component analysis, and phylogenetic analysis revealed three to six groups with no clear patterns of clustering by centers-wise breeding lines, types of corn, kernel characteristics, maturity, plant height, and ear placement. However, genotypes were grouped partially based on their source germplasm from where they derived.


7 March 2020 in Tropical Animal Health and Production
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
KRK. V. Rajasekhar
K. V. Rajasekhar
BPBhukya Prakash
Bhukya Prakash
KLK. Vijaya Lakshmi
K. Vijaya Lakshmi
SRS. V. Rama Rao
S. V. Rama Rao
M.V.L.N. RajuM.V.L.N. Raju
M.V.L.N. Raju

31 January 2012 in Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
BPBhukya Prakash
Bhukya Prakash
SSS. K. Saha
S. K. Saha
KKK. Khate
K. Khate
NAN. Agarwal
N. Agarwal
SKS. Katole
S. Katole
CRC. Rajkhowa
C. Rajkhowa

31 July 2023 in Microorganisms
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Shyam PaulShyam Paul
Shyam Paul
SRSavaram Venkata Rama Rao
Savaram Venkata Rama Rao
RCRudra Nath Chatterjee
Rudra Nath Chatterjee
M.V.L.N. RajuM.V.L.N. Raju
M.V.L.N. Raju
DMDr. Ajay Kumar Mahato
Dr. Ajay Kumar Mahato
PKPrakki Santosh Phani Kumar
Prakki Santosh Phani Kumar
Antimicrobial growth promoters (AGP) are used in chicken production to suppress pathogens in the gut and improve performance, but such products tend to suppress beneficial bacteria while favoring the development and spread of antimicrobial resistance. A green alternative to AGP with the ability to suppress pathogens, but with an additional ability to spare beneficial gut bacteria and improve breeding performance is urgently required. We investigated the effect of supplementation of a blend of select essential oils (cinnamon oil, carvacrol, and thyme oil, henceforth referred to as EO; at two doses: 200 g/t and 400 g/t feed) exhibiting an ability to spare Lactobacillus while exhibiting strong E. coli inhibition ability under in vitro tests and immobilized in a sunflower oil and calcium alginate matrix, to broiler chickens and compared the effects with those of a probiotic yeast (Y), an AGP virginiamycin (V), and a negative control (C). qPCR analysis of metagenomic DNA from the gut content of experimental chickens indicated a significantly (p < 0.05) lower density of E. coli in the EO groups as compared to other groups. Amplicon sequence data of the gut microbiome indicated that all the additives had specific significant effects (DESeq2) on the gut microbiome, such as enrichment of uncultured Clostridia in the V and Y groups and uncultured Ruminococcaceae in the EO groups, as compared to the control. LEfSe analysis of the sequence data indicated a high abundance of beneficial bacteria Ruminococcaceae in the EO groups, Faecalibacterium in the Y group, and Blautia in the V group. Supplementation of the immobilized EO at the dose rate of 400 g/ton feed improved body weight gain (by 64 g/bird), feed efficiency (by 5 points), and cellular immunity (skin thickness response to phytoheamagglutinin lectin from Phaseolus vulgaris by 58%) significantly (p < 0.05), whereas neither yeast nor virginiamycin showed a significant effect on performance parameters. Expression of genes associated with gut barrier and immunity function such as CLAUDIN1, IL6, IFNG, TLR2A, and NOD1 were significantly higher in the EO groups. This study showed that the encapsulated EO mixture can improve the density of beneficial microbes in the gut significantly, with concomitant suppression of potential pathogens such as E.coli and improved performance and immunity, and hence, has a high potential to be used as an effective alternative to AGP in poultry.