Jarkko Rautio

Prof. Jarkko Rautio

University of Eastern Finland (UEF)
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

29Years (1998-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 March 2008 in Nature Reviews Drug Discovery
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JRJarkko Rautio
Jarkko Rautio
HKHanna Kumpulainen
Hanna Kumpulainen
THTycho Heimbach
Tycho Heimbach
ROReza Oliyai
Reza Oliyai
DODooman Oh
Dooman Oh
JSJouko Savolainen
Jouko Savolainen

1 September 2011 in Pharmacological Reviews
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Kristiina HuttunenKristiina Huttunen
Kristiina Huttunen
HRHannu Raunio
Hannu Raunio
JRJarkko Rautio
Jarkko Rautio
The prodrug concept has been used to improve undesirable properties of drugs since the late 19th century, although it was only at the end of the 1950s that the actual term prodrug was introduced for the first time. Prodrugs are inactive, bioreversible derivatives of active drug molecules that must undergo an enzymatic and/or chemical transformation in vivo to release the active parent drug, which can then elicit its desired pharmacological effect in the body. In most cases, prodrugs are simple chemical derivatives that are only one or two chemical or enzymatic steps away from the active parent drug. However, some prodrugs lack an obvious carrier or promoiety but instead result from a molecular modification of the prodrug itself, which generates a new active compound. Numerous prodrugs designed to overcome formulation, delivery, and toxicity barriers to drug utilization have reached the market. In fact, approximately 20% of all small molecular drugs approved during the period 2000 to 2008 were prodrugs. Although the development of a prodrug can be very challenging, the prodrug approach represents a feasible way to improve the erratic properties of investigational drugs or drugs already on the market. This review introduces in depth the rationale behind the use of the prodrug approach from past to present, and also considers the possible problems that can arise from inadequate activation of prodrugs.

1 September 2017 in Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
RWRaoul Walther
Raoul Walther
JRJarkko Rautio
Jarkko Rautio
AZAlexander N. Zelikin
Alexander N. Zelikin

1 May 2006 in Drug Metabolism and Disposition
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JRJarkko Rautio
Jarkko Rautio
JHJoan E. Humphreys
Joan E. Humphreys
LWLindsey O. Webster
Lindsey O. Webster
ABAnand Balakrishnan
Anand Balakrishnan
JKJohn P. Keogh
John P. Keogh
JPJoseph W. Polli
Joseph W. Polli
Because modulation of P-glycoprotein (Pgp) through inhibition or induction can lead to drug-drug interactions by altering intestinal, central nervous system, renal, or biliary efflux, it is anticipated that information regarding the potential interaction of drug candidates with Pgp will be a future regulatory expectation. Therefore, to be able to utilize in vitro Pgp inhibition findings to guide clinical drug interaction studies, the utility of five probe substrates (calcein-AM, colchicine, digoxin, prazosin, and vinblastine) was evaluated by inhibiting their Pgp-mediated transport across multidrug resistance-1-transfected Madin-Darby canine kidney cell type II monolayers with 20 diverse drugs having various degrees of Pgp interaction (e.g., efflux ratio, ATPase, and calcein-AM inhibition). Overall, the rank order of inhibition was generally similar with IC50 values typically within 3- to 5-fold of each other. However, several notable differences in the IC50 values were observed. Digoxin and prazosin were the most sensitive probes (e.g., lowest IC50 values), followed by colchicine, vinblastine, and calcein-AM. Inclusion of other considerations such as a large dynamic range, commercially available radiolabel, and a clinically meaningful probe makes digoxin an attractive probe substrate. Therefore, it is recommended that digoxin be considered as the standard in vitro probe to investigate the inhibition profiles of new drug candidates. Furthermore, this study shows that it may not be necessary to generate IC50 values with multiple probe substrates for Pgp as is currently done for cytochrome P450 3A4. Finally, a strategy integrating results from in vitro assays (efflux, inhibition, and ATPase) is provided to further guide clinical interaction studies.

18 December 2020 in Pharmaceutics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Shiv BahadurShiv Bahadur
Shiv Bahadur
DPDinesh Madhukarrao Pardhi
Dinesh Madhukarrao Pardhi
JRJarkko Rautio
Jarkko Rautio
Jessica M. RosenholmJessica M. Rosenholm
Jessica M. Rosenholm
KPKamla Pathak
Kamla Pathak
The treatment of various central nervous system (CNS) diseases has been challenging, despite the rapid development of several novel treatment approaches. The blood–brain barrier (BBB) is one of the major issues in the treatment of CNS diseases, having major role in the protection of the brain but simultaneously constituting the main limiting hurdle for drugs targeting the brain. Nasal drug delivery has gained significant interest for brain targeting over the past decades, wherein the drug is directly delivered to the brain by the trigeminal and olfactory pathway. Various novel and promising formulation approaches have been explored for drug targeting to the brain by nasal administration. Nanoemulsions have the potential to avoid problems, including low solubility, poor bioavailability, slow onset of action, and enzymatic degradation. The present review highlights research scenarios of nanoemulsions for nose-to-brain delivery for the management of CNS ailments classified on the basis of brain disorders and further identifies the areas that remain unexplored. The significance of the total dose delivered to the target region, biodistribution studies, and long-term toxicity studies have been identified as the key areas of future research.

5 February 2008 in The AAPS Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JRJarkko Rautio
Jarkko Rautio
KLKrista Laine
Krista Laine
MGMikko Gynther
Mikko Gynther
JSJouko Savolainen
Jouko Savolainen