(1) The prevention of cytomegalovirus (CMV) in lung transplant recipients (LTx) is based on the administration of VGC for a period of 6–12 months, but there is little information on the premature discontinuation of the drug. Our objective was to evaluate the reasons for early cessation of VGC and the dynamics of CMV replication after discontinuation. (2) We carried out a retrospective study of LTx on VGC prophylaxis according to guidelines, with an outpatient follow-up period of >90 days. The detection of any level of CMV-DNA in the plasma (Cobas, Roche Diagnostics^®) during a period of 18 months after the discontinuation of VGC was considered positive. (3) We included 312 patients (64% male, mean age 53.50 ± 12.27; 71% D+R+, 15% D−R+, and 14% D+R−) in our study. The prescribed prophylaxis was completed by 179 patients (57.05%). The mean duration of prophylaxis was 7.17 ± 1.08 months. The recorded reasons for VGC discontinuation in 133 patients (43%) were myelotoxicity (n = 55), impaired renal function (n = 32), and gastrointestinal disturbances (n = 11). The reason for discontinuation was not recorded for 29 patients. CMV-DNA was detected in 79% (n = 246) of cases, and D+R+ and D+R− recipients showed a high risk of detection (p < 0.001). The median times to onset of CMV-DNA detection were 35 days in D+R−, 73 days in D+R+, and 96 days in D−R+ (p < 0.001). (4) Adverse effects of VGC are frequent in LTx. CMV-DNA detection is very common after the discontinuation of VGC and is related to the CMV donor and recipient serostatus.

Background/Objectives: Neutropenia is a frequent complication among solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients receiving immunosuppressive therapy and antimicrobial prophylaxis. However, there are limited studies analysing the frequency and impact of neutropenia in lung transplant recipients (LTRs). Our aim was to analyse the frequency of neutropenia, the need for granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (GCSF) treatment within the first 18 months post-transplant and its association with acute rejection, chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD), overall survival and the development of infections. Methods: This observational and retrospective study recruited 305 patients who underwent lung transplantation between 2009 and 2019, with outpatient quarterly follow-up during the first 18 months post-surgery.Results: During this period, 51.8% of patients experienced at least one episode of neutropenia. Neutropenia was classified as mild in 50.57% of cases, moderate in 36.88% and severe in 12.54%. GCSF treatment was indicated in 23.28% of patients, with a mean dose of 3.53 units. No statistically significant association was observed between neutropenia or its severity and the development of acute rejection, CLAD or overall survival. However, the patients who received GCSF treatment had a higher mortality rate compared to those who did not. Sixteen patients (5.25%) developed infections during neutropenia, with bacterial infections being the most common. Conclusions: Neutropenia is common in the first 18 months after lung transplantation and most episodes are mild. We did not find an association between neutropenia and acute rejection, CLAD, or mortality. However, the use of GCSF were associated with worse post-transplant survival.

Background/Objectives: Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection is a frequent complication after lung transplantation, especially in high-risk donor-positive/recipient-negative (D+/R−) patients. CMV-specific hyperimmunoglobulin (CMV-HIG), administered either with antivirals or as monotherapy, may be beneficial for preventing or treating CMV infection in selected clinical scenarios. This study evaluated CMV-HIG indications and their impact on clinical outcomes in our lung transplant unit. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed adult lung transplant recipients (2010–2023) who received ≥2 doses of CMV-HIG for universal prophylaxis, monotherapy prophylaxis, preemptive therapy, or treatment of invasive disease. Results: CMV-HIG was administered to 204 out of 336 recipients (61%). CMV-HIG was well tolerated, with no treatment-related adverse events. Indications were preemptive therapy (63%), universal prophylaxis (24%), monotherapy prophylaxis (7%), and treatment of invasive disease (6%). CMV-HIG was well tolerated, with no treatment-related adverse events. No patients developed invasive disease during combination prophylaxis or preemptive treatment. The combination treatment of patients with invasive disease was also effective, and no cases of VGC resistance were detected. CMV-HIG monoprophylaxis has allowed us to delay or prevent viral replication in recipients who developed VGC side effects. Rates of acute rejection, Chronic Lung Allograft Dysfunction (CLAD), and overall survival were similar across CMV risk groups. Conclusions: Our results showed that the combined use of CMV-HIG and antiviral agents is effective in preventing CMV infection and disease in high-risk lung transplant recipients. This combination is also useful in treating invasive disease and preventing VGC resistance. Additionally, CMV-HIG monoprohylaxis can delay or prevent viral replication in recipients experiencing VGC-related side effects. These findings support the use of CMV-HIG in selected clinical settings, although prospective studies are needed to define its potential benefits within the current therapeutic armamentarium.