Fatty liver disease is no longer a niche hepatology problem but is increasingly recognized as a systemic metabolic-inflammatory disorder. Large-scale epidemiological analyses have estimated that metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) affects over 25% of the general population and is tightly associated with obesity, insulin resistance, and type 2 diabetes (Younossi et al., 2023;Cusi et al., 2025). In parallel, alcohol-associated liver disease (ALD), spanning from steatosis to cirrhosis, remains one of the leading causes of liver-related deaths worldwide. Its development, in addition to its unique triggers related to alcohol metabolism, is often linked to a dangerous combination of metabolic dysfunction (Gao et al., 2025;Pan et al., 2025). These observations challenge traditional binary disease classifications and underscore the need for integrated pathogenic frameworks.At the mechanistic level, metabolic overload and alcohol exposure function as primary upstream stressors that initiate hepatocellular injury. Excess nutrient availability promotes hepatic lipid accumulation and associated lipotoxicity, alters fatty acid flux, and induces insulin resistance, while ethanol metabolism generates toxic intermediates (e.g., acetaldehyde) and oxidative stress (Cheng et al., 2016;Lee et al., 2025). These primary hepatocellular stresses subsequently engage innate immune sensing and adaptive immune polarization, shaping whether injury resolves or progresses toward fibrogenesis. Importantly, innate and adaptive immune remodeling is increasingly recognized predominantly not as the initiating event but as a secondary amplification system that sustains inflammation and fibrogenesis once hepatocyte injury is established (Peiseler et al., 2022). This hierarchical organization helps explain why distinct etiologies converge on overlapping inflammatory and fibrotic phenotypes during disease progression.At the cellular execution layer, while distinct upstream injuries are not entirely identical, they functionally converge on a limited set of conserved stress-response pathways. Lipotoxicityinduced organelle dysfunction, mitochondrial impairment, oxidative injury, and dysregulated wound-healing responses are common molecular nodes in both metabolic liver diseases and alcoholic liver diseases (Garcia-Ruiz and Fernandez-Checa, 2018;Kim and Kim, 2020;Prasun et al., 2021;Contreras-Zentella et al., 2025). These processes shape hepatocyte fate decisions, inflammatory signaling, and extracellular matrix remodeling, thereby providing a mechanistic basis for the overlapping histological features observed in MASLD and ALD, particularly during the transition from steatosis to steatohepatitis and fibrosis.The rapid conceptual evolution of the field is reflected in recent changes to disease nomenclature. A multisociety Delphi consensus introduced steatotic liver disease as an umbrella term and repositioned NAFLD/NASH as MASLD/MASH, while explicitly defining overlap categories such as metabolic and alcohol related/associated liver disease (MetALD) (Rinella et al., 2023). This nomenclature update coincides with, but is conceptually distinct from, ongoing discussions comparing MASLD and MAFLD, in which MAFLD has been reported to better capture all-cause mortality as well as hepatic and extrahepatic outcomes that closely track fibrosis severity (Lonardo et al., 2025). Importantly, these parallel frameworks converge on a shared conclusion: metabolic dysfunction and alcohol exposure frequently coexist and interact. Consistent with this view, cohort studies further suggest that mixed metabolic-alcoholic phenotypes exhibit distinct trajectories of fibrosis progression and clinical outcomes, reinforcing the clinical relevance of overlap states (Sogabe et al., 2023;Marti-Aguado et al., 2024).Within this evolving scenario, immunometabolic coupling has emerged as a central organizing principle. Hepatic immune cells respond dynamically to metabolic and toxic stress, with macrophages, dendritic cells, and lymphocyte subsets adopting context-dependent phenotypes that can either exacerbate injury or promote resolution. Reviews within this Research Topic emphasize that cytokine signaling networks integrate metabolic cues with inflammatory responses. Liu et al. synthesized evidence indicating that members of the interleukin-6 cytokine family participate in regulating lipid metabolism, insulin sensitivity, inflammatory amplification, and fibrogenesis in MASLD, supporting the view that cytokine pathways function as active immunometabolic regulators rather than passive downstream markers.Beyond immune signaling, regulated inflammatory cell death pathways have gained increasing attention as critical links between hepatocyte injury and immune activation. Pyroptosis and related execution programs promote the release of danger-associated molecular patterns, thereby reinforcing inflammatory feedback loops (Farrell et al., 2018). In this context, Deng et al. provided evidence suggesting that short-term high-fat diet exposure synergizes with acute ethanol binge to exacerbate liver injury through oxidative stress, MAPK/NF-κB activation, and engagement of both canonical and non-canonical pyroptotic pathways. These findings provide mechanistic insight into the convergence of metabolic and alcohol-related stressors at the level of inflammatory execution programs, thereby offering a biologically grounded explanation for the heightened inflammatory injury observed in mixed-exposure contexts.Translationally, the absence of effective pharmacological therapies for advanced fatty liver disease has long represented a major unmet need. This landscape is now rapidly changing. In 2024, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved resmetirom for adults with noncirrhotic MASH and moderate-to-advanced fibrosis, marking the first disease-modifying therapy for this indication (Huang et al., 2025). More recently, incretin-based...