Ming Liu

Dr. Ming Liu


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

21Years (2006-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
26 June 2011 in Virology Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CLChun G Liu
Chun G Liu
MLMing Liu
Ming Liu
FLFei Liu
Fei Liu
DLDa F Liu
Da F Liu
YZYun Zhang
Yun Zhang
WXWen H Xiang
Wen H Xiang
The effects of three different adjuvants, mineral oil, Montanide™ ISA 70M VG, and Montanide™ ISA 206 VG, were evaluated on reverse genetics H5N3 avian influenza virus cell cultured vaccine. The immune results of SPF chickens after challenging with highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) virus demonstrated that mineral oil adjuvant group and 70M adjuvant group provided 100% protection efficiency, but 206 adjuvant group provided only 40%. Statistical analysis indicated that the protection effects of mineral oil adjuvant group and the 70M adjuvant showed no significant difference to each other, but with significant difference to 206 adjuvant group. All three groups could induce high titres of antibody after immunizing SPF ducks, but there was no significant difference among them. The immunization effect of 70M adjuvant group on SPF chickens were the best and showed significant difference compared with optimized 70Mi Montanide™ eight series adjuvants groups. These results suggest that 70M adjuvant could be a novel adjuvant for preparing avian influenza vaccine.

13 January 2011 in Intervirology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
XZXintao Zhang
Xintao Zhang
MLMing Liu
Ming Liu
CLChunguo Liu
Chunguo Liu
JDJinling Du
Jinling Du
WSWeilin Shi
Weilin Shi
YZYun Zhang
Yun Zhang
Objective: Currently, research is focused on universal influenza vaccines based on various ectodomains of the influenza matrix protein 2 (M2e). Such vaccines are tested mostly using mouse-adapted influenza viruses and in mouse or ferret models. The aim of this study was to investigate in a chicken model the protective efficacy of vaccines based on avian-type M2e at different epitope densities. Methods: On the basis of the optimized avian-type M2e gene, recombinant plasmids that contained tandem copies of different M2e were constructed and expressed in Escherichia coli. The expression and immunogenicity of the proteins were confirmed by SDS-PAGE and Western blot, as well as immunofluorescence assay and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Animals were immunized with fusion proteins emulsified with an appropriate adjuvant and then infected with highly pathogenic influenza virus of A/chicken/Guangdong/04 (H5N1). Antibody levels, survival rate and weight loss were investigated. Results: Multiple copies of M2e were highly expressed; higher epitope density engendered better protection but there was not a linear increase. Among the fusion proteins, the MBP-3·M2e fusion protein showed the best protective efficacy. Conclusions: This study has provided evidence that the immune response to avian-type M2e-based subunit vaccines was greater in chickens than that in mice. In addition, higher M2e epitope density can yield better protection, but not in a linear fashion.

23 February 2015 in PLOS ONE
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
XWXiaoying Wu
Xiaoying Wu
XLXiaojun Li
Xiaojun Li
QZQingshan Zhang
Qingshan Zhang
SWShaozhou Wulin
Shaozhou Wulin
XBXiaofei Bai
Xiaofei Bai
YZYun Zhang
Yun Zhang
The VP1 protein of duck hepatitis A virus (DHAV) is a major structural protein that induces neutralizing antibodies in ducks; however, B-cell epitopes on the VP1 protein of duck hepatitis A genotype 1 virus (DHAV-1) have not been characterized. To characterize B-cell epitopes on VP1, we used the monoclonal antibody (mAb) 2D10 against Escherichia coli-expressed VP1 of DHAV-1. In vitro, mAb 2D10 neutralized DHAV-1 virus. By using an array of overlapping 12-mer peptides, we found that mAb 2D10 recognized phages displaying peptides with the consensus motif LPAPTS. Sequence alignment showed that the epitope 173LPAPTS178 is highly conserved among the DHAV-1 genotypes. Moreover, the six amino acid peptide LPAPTS was proven to be the minimal unit of the epitope with maximal binding activity to mAb 2D10. DHAV-1–positive duck serum reacted with the epitope in dot blotting assay, revealing the importance of the six amino acids of the epitope for antibody-epitope binding. Competitive inhibition assays of mAb 2D10 binding to synthetic LPAPTS peptides and truncated VP1 protein fragments, detected by Western blotting, also verify that LPAPTS was the VP1 epitope. We identified LPAPTS as a VP1-specific linear B-cell epitope recognized by the neutralizing mAb 2D10. Our findings have potential applications in the development of diagnostic techniques and epitope-based marker vaccines against DHAV-1.

8 November 2016 in Scientific Reports
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
CLChenxi Li
Chenxi Li
XBXiaofei Bai
Xiaofei Bai
RMRunze Meng
Runze Meng
WSWulin Shaozhou
Wulin Shaozhou
QZQingshan Zhang
Qingshan Zhang
YZYun Zhang
Yun Zhang
In 2010, a pathogenic flavivirus termed duck Tembusu virus (DTMUV) caused widespread outbreak of egg-drop syndrome in domesticated ducks in China. Although the glycoprotein E of DTMUV is an important structural component of the virus, the B-cell epitopes of this protein remains uncharacterized. Using phage display and mutagenesis, we identified a minimal B-cell epitope, 374EXE/DPPFG380, that mediates binding to a nonneutralizing monoclonal antibody. DTMUV-positive duck serum reacted with the epitope, and amino acid substitutions revealed the specific amino acids that are essential for antibody binding. Dot-blot assays of various flavivirus-positive sera indicated that EXE/DPPFG is a cross-reactive epitope in most flaviviruses, including Zika, West Nile, Yellow fever, dengue, and Japanese encephalitis viruses. These findings indicate that the epitope sequence is conserved among many strains of mosquito-borne flavivirus. Protein structure modeling revealed that the epitope is located in domain III of the DTMUV E protein. Together, these results provide new insights on the broad cross-reactivity of a B-cell binding site of the E protein of flaviviruses, which can be exploited as a diagnostic or therapeutic target for identifying, studying, or treating DTMUV and other flavivirus infections.

1 January 2017 in Virus Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
XLXiaojun Li
Xiaojun Li
RZRan Zhao
Ran Zhao
WLWei Lin
Wei Lin
CLChenxi Li
Chenxi Li
TZTingting Zhang
Tingting Zhang
YZYun Zhang
Yun Zhang

23 November 2012 in Virology Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
XYXiuchen Yin
Xiuchen Yin
SZShumei Zhang
Shumei Zhang
YGYoulan Gao
Youlan Gao
JLJinzhe Li
Jinzhe Li
STShuyi Tan
Shuyi Tan
YZYun Zhang
Yun Zhang
Background: The VP3 protein of goose parvovirus (GPV) or Muscovy duck parvovirus (MDPV), a major structural protein, can induce neutralizing antibodies in geese and ducks, but monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) against VP3 protein has never been characterized. Results: Three hybridoma cell lines secreting anti-GPV VP3 MAbs were obtained and designated 4A8, 4E2, and 2D5. Immunoglobulin subclass tests differentiated them as IgG2b (4A8 and 4E2) and IgG2a (2D5). Dot blotting assays showed that three MAbs reacted with His-VP3 protein in a conformation-independent manner. A competitive binding assay indicated that the MAbs delineated two epitopes, A and B of VP3. Immunofluorescence assay showed that MAbs 4A8, 4E2, and 2D5 could specifically bind to goose embryo fibroblast cells (GEF) or duck fibroblast cells (DEF) infected with GPV and MDPV. Dot blotting also showed that the MAbs recognized both nature GPV and MDPV antigen. Western blotting confirmed that the MAbs recognized VP3 proteins derived from purified GPV and MDPV particles. The MAbs 4A8 and 2D5 had universal reactivity to heterologous GPV and MDPV tested in an antigen-capture enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Conclusions: Preparation and characterization of these the MAbs suggests that they may be useful for the development of a MAb-capture ELISA for rapid detection of both GPV and MDPV. Virus isolation and PCR are reliable for detecting GPV and MDPV infection, but these procedures are laborious, time-consuming, and requiring instruments. These diagnosis problems highlight the ongoing demand for rapid, reproducible, and automatic methods for the sensitive detection of both GPV and MDPV infection.