Mark Pogson

Dr. Mark Pogson


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

21Years (2006-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 July 2006 in BioSystems
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MPMark Pogson
Mark Pogson
RSRod Smallwood
Rod Smallwood
EQEva Qwarnstrom
Eva Qwarnstrom
MHMike Holcombe
Mike Holcombe

26 October 2015 in GCB Bioenergy
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ASAndrea Santangeli
Andrea Santangeli
TTTuuli Toivonen
Tuuli Toivonen
FPFederico Montesino Pouzols
Federico Montesino Pouzols
MPMark Pogson
Mark Pogson
AHAstley Hastings
Astley Hastings
AMAtte Moilanen
Atte Moilanen
Reliance on fossil fuels is causing unprecedented climate change and is accelerating environmental degradation and global biodiversity loss. Together, climate change and biodiversity loss, if not averted urgently, may inflict severe damage on ecosystem processes, functions and services that support the welfare of modern societies. Increasing renewable energy deployment and expanding the current protected area network represent key solutions to these challenges, but conflicts may arise over the use of limited land for energy production as opposed to biodiversity conservation. Here, we compare recently identified core areas for the expansion of the global protected area network with the renewable energy potential available from land‐based solar photovoltaic, wind energy and bioenergy (in the form of Miscanthus × giganteus). We show that these energy sources have very different biodiversity impacts and net energy contributions. The extent of risks and opportunities deriving from renewable energy development is highly dependent on the type of renewable source harvested, the restrictions imposed on energy harvest and the region considered, with Central America appearing at particularly high potential risk from renewable energy expansion. Without restrictions on power generation due to factors such as production and transport costs, we show that bioenergy production is a major potential threat to biodiversity, while the potential impact of wind and solar appears smaller than that of bioenergy. However, these differences become reduced when energy potential is restricted by external factors including local energy demand. Overall, we found that areas of opportunity for developing solar and wind energy with little harm to biodiversity could exist in several regions of the world, with the magnitude of potential impact being particularly dependent on restrictions imposed by local energy demand. The evidence provided here helps guide sustainable development of renewable energy and contributes to the targeting of global efforts in climate mitigation and biodiversity conservation.

1 January 2012 in Integrative Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MHMike Holcombe
Mike Holcombe
SASalem Adra
Salem Adra
MBMesude Bicak
Mesude Bicak
SCShawn Chin
Shawn Chin
SCSimon Coakley
Simon Coakley
DWDavid Worth
David Worth
New advances in modelling technology allow for highly detailed and realistic simulations of many biological systems.

16 November 2011 in Environmental Modelling & Software
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MPMark Pogson
Mark Pogson
AHAstley Hastings
Astley Hastings
PSPete Smith
Pete Smith

1 November 2014 in Biomass and Bioenergy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MSMadhu Subedi
Madhu Subedi
RMRobin B. Matthews
Robin B. Matthews
MPMark Pogson
Mark Pogson
AAAssefa Abegaz
Assefa Abegaz
BBBedru Babulo Balana
Bedru Babulo Balana
JSJo Smith
Jo Smith

1 January 2015 in Environmental Modelling & Software
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MPMark Pogson
Mark Pogson
PSPete Smith
Pete Smith