BACKGROUND: The mechanical power of ventilation (MP) has an association with outcome in invasively ventilated patients with the acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Whether a similar association exists in invasively ventilated patients without ARDS is less certain. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the association of mechanical power with mortality in ICU patients without ARDS. DESIGN: This was an individual patient data analysis that uses the data of three multicentre randomised trials. SETTING: This study was performed in academic and nonacademic ICUs in the Netherlands. PATIENTS: One thousand nine hundred and sixty-two invasively ventilated patients without ARDS were included in this analysis. The median [IQR] age was 67 [57 to 75] years, 706 (36%) were women. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was the all-cause mortality at day 28. Secondary outcomes were the all-cause mortality at day 90, and length of stay in ICU and hospital. RESULTS: At day 28, 644 patients (33%) had died. Hazard ratios for mortality at day 28 were higher with an increasing MP, even when stratified for its individual components (driving pressure (P < 0.001), tidal volume (P < 0.001), respiratory rate (P < 0.001) and maximum airway pressure (P = 0.001). Similar associations of mechanical power (MP) were found with mortality at day 90, lengths of stay in ICU and hospital. Hazard ratios for mortality at day 28 were not significantly different if patients were stratified for MP, with increasing levels of each individual component. CONCLUSION: In ICU patients receiving invasive ventilation for reasons other than ARDS, MP had an independent association with mortality. This finding suggests that MP holds an added predictive value over its individual components, making MP an attractive measure to monitor and possibly target in these patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02159196, ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02153294, ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03167580.

Importance: The effect of individualized high positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) and recruitment maneuvers, targeting a low driving pressure, on clinical outcomes in patients undergoing open abdominal surgery is uncertain. Objective: To compare driving pressure–guided high PEEP and recruitment maneuvers with standard low PEEP without recruitment maneuvers with respect to postoperative pulmonary complications. Design, Setting, and Participants: Randomized clinical trial of 1435 adults at increased risk for postoperative pulmonary complications who were scheduled for open abdominal surgery. The trial was conducted at 29 sites in 5 countries across Europe from April 2019 to December 2024; final follow-up was in March 2025. Statistical analysis was conducted in May 2025. Intervention: Patients were randomized to undergo intraoperative ventilation with driving pressure–guided high PEEP and recruitment maneuvers (n = 718) or to intraoperative ventilation with standard low PEEP (n = 717). All patients received low tidal volume ventilation. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was a composite of pulmonary complications within the first 5 postoperative days, including severe respiratory failure, bronchospasm, suspected pulmonary infection, pulmonary infiltrates, aspiration pneumonitis, atelectasis, acute respiratory distress syndrome, pleural effusion, cardiopulmonary edema, and pneumothorax. Among the 16 prespecified secondary outcomes, 4 concerned intraoperative complications, including hypotension (decrease in mean arterial pressure of >20% for >3 minutes) and desaturation (Sp o ₂ <92% for >1 minute). Results: Among 1468 adults, 1435 (98%) completed the trial (median [IQR] age, 66 [57-74] years; 52% female). In the primary analysis population, the primary outcome occurred in 142 of 718 patients (19.8%) in the driving pressure–guided high PEEP group compared with 125 of 717 patients (17.4%) in the low PEEP group (absolute difference, 2.5% [95% CI, −1.5% to 6.4%]; P = .23). The incidence of hypotension (382 [54.0%] vs 317 [45.0%]) and use of vasoactive agents (224 [32.0%] vs 130 [18.8%]) was higher in the high PEEP group; the incidence of intraoperative desaturation (6 [0.8%] vs 20 [2.8%]) was higher in the low PEEP group. Conclusions and Relevance: Among patients at increased risk for postoperative pulmonary complications undergoing open abdominal surgery under general anesthesia, intraoperative ventilation with driving pressure–guided high PEEP and recruitment maneuvers, compared with a strategy with standard low PEEP, did not reduce postoperative pulmonary complications. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03884543

We describe the incidence and practice of prone positioning and determined the association of use of prone positioning with outcomes in invasively ventilated patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) due to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in a national, multicenter observational study, performed at 22 intensive care units in the Netherlands. Patients were categorized into 4 groups, based on indication for and actual use of prone positioning. The primary outcome was 28-day mortality. Secondary endpoints were 90-day mortality, and ICU and hospital length of stay. In 734 patients, prone positioning was indicated in 60%—the incidence of prone positioning was higher in patients with an indication than in patients without an indication for prone positioning (77 vs. 48%, p = 0.001). Patients were left in the prone position for median 15.0 (10.5–21.0) hours per full calendar day—the duration was longer in patients with an indication than in patients without an indication for prone positioning (16.0 (11.0–23.0) vs. 14.0 (10.0–19.0) hours, p < 0.001). Ventilator settings and ventilation parameters were not different between the four groups, except for FiO₂ which was higher in patients having an indication for and actually receiving prone positioning. Our data showed no difference in mortality at day 28 between the 4 groups (HR no indication, no prone vs. no indication, prone vs. indication, no prone vs. indication, prone: 1.05 (0.76–1.45) vs. 0.88 (0.62–1.26) vs. 1.15 (0.80–1.54) vs. 0.96 (0.73–1.26) (p = 0.08)). Factors associated with the use of prone positioning were ARDS severity and FiO₂. The findings of this study are that prone positioning is often used in COVID-19 patients, even in patients that have no indication for this intervention. Sessions of prone positioning lasted long. Use of prone positioning may affect outcomes.

Background: Outcome prediction in critically ill patients under invasive ventilation remains extremely challenging. The driving pressure (ΔP) and the mechanical power of ventilation (MP) are associated with patient-centered outcomes like mortality and duration of ventilation. The objective of this study was to assess the predictive validity for mortality of the ΔP and the MP at 24 h after start of invasive ventilation. Methods: This is a post hoc analysis of an observational study in intensive care unit patients, restricted to critically ill patients receiving invasive ventilation for at least 24 h. The two exposures of interest were the modified ΔP and the MP at 24 h after start of invasive ventilation. The primary outcome was 90-day mortality; secondary outcomes were ICU and hospital mortality. The predictive validity was measured as incremental 90-day mortality beyond that predicted by the Acute Physiology, Age and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) IV score and the Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS) II. Results: The analysis included 839 patients with a 90-day mortality of 42%. The median modified ΔP at 24 h was 15 [interquartile range 12 to 19] cm H₂O; the median MP at 24 h was 206 [interquartile range 145 to 298] 10⁻³ J/min/kg predicted body weight (PBW). Both parameters were associated with 90-day mortality (odds ratio (OR) for 1 cm H₂O increase in the modified ΔP, 1.05 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.03 to 1.08]; P < 0.001; OR for 100 10⁻³ J/min/kg PBW increase in the MP, 1.20 [95% CI 1.09 to 1.33]; P < 0.001). Area under the ROC for 90-day mortality of the modified ΔP and the MP were 0.70 [95% CI 0.66 to 0.74] and 0.69 [95% CI 0.65 to 0.73], which was neither different from that of the APACHE IV score nor that of the SAPS II. Conclusions: In adult patients under invasive ventilation, the modified ΔP and the MP at 24 h are associated with 90 day mortality. Neither the modified ΔP nor the MP at 24 h has predictive validity beyond the APACHE IV score and the SAPS II.

Introduction: The driving pressure (ΔP) has an independent association with outcome in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). INTELLiVENT-Adaptive Support Ventilation (ASV) is a closed-loop mode of ventilation that targets the lowest work and force of breathing. Aim: To compare transpulmonary and respiratory system ΔP between closed-loop ventilation and conventional pressure controlled ventilation in patients with moderate-to-severe ARDS. Methods: Single-center randomized cross-over clinical trial in patients in the early phase of ARDS. Patients were randomly assigned to start with a 4-h period of closed-loop ventilation or conventional ventilation, after which the alternate ventilation mode was selected. The primary outcome was the transpulmonary ΔP; secondary outcomes included respiratory system ΔP, and other key parameters of ventilation. Results: Thirteen patients were included, and all had fully analyzable data sets. Compared to conventional ventilation, with closed-loop ventilation the median transpulmonary ΔP with was lower (7.0 [5.0–10.0] vs. 10.0 [8.0–11.0] cmH₂O, mean difference − 2.5 [95% CI − 2.6 to − 2.1] cmH₂O; P = 0.0001). Inspiratory transpulmonary pressure and the respiratory rate were also lower. Tidal volume, however, was higher with closed-loop ventilation, but stayed below generally accepted safety cutoffs in the majority of patients. Conclusions: In this small physiological study, when compared to conventional pressure controlled ventilation INTELLiVENT-ASV reduced the transpulmonary ΔP in patients in the early phase of moderate-to-severe ARDS. This closed-loop ventilation mode also led to a lower inspiratory transpulmonary pressure and a lower respiratory rate, thereby reducing the intensity of ventilation. Trial registration Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT03211494, July 7, 2017. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03211494?term=airdrop&draw=2&rank=1.

Background: Outcome prediction in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is challenging, especially in patients with severe hypoxemia. The aim of the current study was to determine the prognostic capacity of changes in PaO₂/FiO₂, dead space fraction (V_D/V_T) and respiratory system driving pressure (ΔP_RS) induced by the first prone position (PP) session in patients with ARDS. Methods: This was a post hoc analysis of the conveniently-sized ‘Molecular Diagnosis and Risk Stratification of Sepsis’ study (MARS). The current analysis included ARDS patients who were placed in the PP. The primary endpoint was the prognostic capacity of the PP-induced changes in PaO₂/FiO₂, V_D/V_T, and ΔP_RS for 28-day mortality. PaO₂/FiO₂, V_D/V_T, and ΔP_RS was calculated using variables obtained in the supine position before and after completion of the first PP session. Receiving operator characteristic curves (ROC) were constructed, and sensitivity, specificity positive and negative predictive value were calculated based on the best cutoffs. Results: Ninety patients were included; 28-day mortality was 46%. PP-induced changes in PaO₂/FiO₂ and V_D/V_T were similar between survivors vs. non-survivors [+83 (+24 to +137) vs. +58 (+21 to +113) mmHg, and –0.06 (–0.17 to +0.05) vs. –0.08 (–0.16 to +0.08), respectively]. PP-induced changes in ΔP_RS were different between survivors vs. non-survivors [–3 (–7 to 2) vs. 0 (–3 to +3) cmH₂O; P=0.03]. The area under the ROC of PP-induced changes in ΔP_RS for mortality, however, was low [0.63 (95% confidence interval (CI), 0.50 to 0.75]; PP-induced changes in ΔP_RS had a sensitivity and specificity of 76% and 56%, and a positive and negative predictive value of 60% and 73%. Conclusions: Changes in PaO₂/FiO₂, V_D/V_T, and ΔP_RS induced by the first PP session have poor prognostic capacities for 28-day mortality in ARDS patients.