Shuai Shao

Mr. Shuai Shao


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

11Years (2016-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
6 September 2023 in Sustainability
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SSShuai Shao
Shuai Shao
DFDianzheng Fu
Dianzheng Fu
TYTianji Yang
Tianji Yang
Hailin MuHailin Mu
Hailin Mu
QGQiufeng Gao
Qiufeng Gao
YZYun Zhang
Yun Zhang
With China’s significant investment in wastewater treatment plants, urban sewage is effectively collected and treated, resulting in a substantial byproduct—sludge. As of 2021, a total of 2827 wastewater treatment plants have been constructed across 31 provinces, municipalities, and autonomous regions in China, with a processing capacity of 60.16 billion cubic meters. The production of dry sludge amounts to 14.229 million tons. The treatment and utilization of sludge pose significant challenges. The scientific calculation of sludge production is the basis for the reduction at the source and the design of sludge treatment and energy utilization. It is directly related to the construction scale, structure size, and equipment selection of the sludge treatment and utilization system and affects the operation and environmental management of the sludge treatment system. The wastewater treatment process using microbial metabolism is influenced by various known and unknown parameters, exhibiting highly nonlinear characteristics. These complex characteristics require the use of mathematical modeling for simulations and control. In this study, nine types of machine learning algorithms were used to establish sludge production prediction models. The extreme gradient boosting tree (XGBoost) and random forest models had the best prediction accuracies, with the former having RMSE, MAE, MAPE, and R2 values of 4.4815, 2.1169, 1.7032, 0.0415, and 0.8218, respectively. These results suggested a superiority of ensemble learning models in fitting highly nonlinear data. In addition, the contribution and influence of various input features affecting sludge output were also studied for the XGBoost model, and the daily wastewater inflow volume and surrounding temperature features had the greatest impact on sludge production. The innovation of this study lies in the application of machine learning algorithms to achieve the prediction of sludge production in wastewater treatment plants.

24 December 2016 in Sustainability
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SSShuai Shao
Shuai Shao
Hailin MuHailin Mu
Hailin Mu
FYFenglin Yang
Fenglin Yang
YZYun Zhang
Yun Zhang
JLJinhua Li
Jinhua Li
Municipal wastewater treatment plants consume much energy and manpower, are expensive to run, and generate sludge and treated wastewater whilst removing pollutants through specific treatment regimes. The sustainable development of the wastewater treatment industry is therefore challenging, and a comprehensive evaluation method is needed for assessing the sustainability of different wastewater treatment processes, for identifying the improvement potential of treatment plants, and for directing policymakers, management measures and development strategies. This study established improved evaluation indicators based on Emergy Analysis that place total wastewater, resources, energy, economic input and emission of pollutants on the same scale compared to the traditional indicators. The sustainability of four wastewater treatment plants and their associated Anaerobic-Anoxic-Oxic (A2O), Constant Waterlevel Sequencing Batch Reactor (CWSBR), Cyclic Activated Sludge Technology (CAST) and Biological Aerated Filter (BAF) treatment processes were assessed in a city in northeast China. Results show that the CWSBR process was the most sustainable wastewater treatment process according to its largest calculated value of Improved Emergy Sustainable Index (2.53 × 100), followed by BAF (1.60 × 100), A2O (9.78 × 10−1) and CAST (5.77 × 10−1). Emergy Analysis provided improved indicators that are suitable for comparing different wastewater treatment processes.

4 March 2021 in Environmental Science and Pollution Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
SSShuai Shao
Shuai Shao
HMHailin Mu
Hailin Mu
AKArturo A. Keller
Arturo A. Keller
Yi YangYi Yang
Yi Yang
HHHaochen Hou
Haochen Hou
YZYun Zhang
Yun Zhang