Vincent Rocher

Dr. Vincent Rocher


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

22Years (2005-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 July 2014 in Waste Management
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
RMR. Mailler
R. Mailler
JGJohnny Gaspéri
Johnny Gaspéri
GCG. Chebbo
G. Chebbo
VRVincent Rocher
Vincent Rocher

1 January 2017 in Waste Management
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
RMR. Mailler
R. Mailler
JGJohnny Gaspéri
Johnny Gaspéri
DPD. Patureau
D. Patureau
EVEmmanuelle Vulliet
Emmanuelle Vulliet
NDN. Delgenes
N. Delgenes
VRVincent Rocher
Vincent Rocher

24 December 2013 in Environmental Science and Pollution Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
RMR. Mailler
R. Mailler
JGJohnny Gaspéri
Johnny Gaspéri
VRVincent Rocher
Vincent Rocher
SGS. Gilbert-Pawlik
S. Gilbert-Pawlik
DGD. Geara-Matta
D. Geara-Matta
GCG. Chebbo
G. Chebbo

1 February 2022 in Science of The Total Environment
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
KNKashif Nadeem
Kashif Nadeem
MAMarion Alliet
Marion Alliet
QPQueralt Plana
Queralt Plana
JBJean Bernier
Jean Bernier
SASam Azimi
Sam Azimi
CAClaire Albasi
Claire Albasi

1 May 2012 in Water Science & Technology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
VRVincent Rocher
Vincent Rocher
CPCatherine Paffoni
Catherine Paffoni
AGAlexandre Gonçalves
Alexandre Gonçalves
SGSabrina Guérin
Sabrina Guérin
SASam Azimi
Sam Azimi
André PaussAndré Pauss
André Pauss
One of the largest wastewater treatment plants in the Paris conurbation (240,000 m3/d) has been studied over several years in order to provide technical and economical information about biological treatment by biofiltration. Biofiltration systems are processes in which carbon and nitrogen pollution of wastewater are treated by ascendant flow through immersed fixed cultures. This paper, focused on technical information, aims: (1) to compare performances of the three biological treatment layouts currently used in biofiltration systems: upstream denitrification (UD), downstream denitrification (DD) and combined upstream-downstream denitrification (U-DD) layouts; and (2) to describe in detail each treatment step. Our study has shown that more than 90% of the carbon and ammoniacal pollution is removed during biological treatment, whatever the layout used. Nitrate, produced during nitrification, is then reduced to atmospheric nitrogen. This reduction is more extensive when the denitrification stage occurs downstream from the treatment (DD layout with methanol addition), whereas it is only partial when it is inserted upstream from the treatment (UD layout – use of endogenous carbonaceous substrate). So, the UD layout leads to a nitrate concentration that exceeds the regulatory threshold in the effluent, and the treatment must be supplemented with a post-denitrification step (U-DD layout). Our work has also shown that the optimal ammonium-loading rate is about 1.1–1.2 kg N-NH4+ per m3 media (polystyrene) and day. For denitrification, the optimal nitrate-loading rate is about 2.5 kg N per m3 media (expanded clay) and day in the case of DD with methanol, and is about 0.25 kg N-NO3− per m3 media and day in the case of UD with exogenous carbonaceous substrate.

1 September 2016 in Science of The Total Environment
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JBJulien Bollon
Julien Bollon
AFAhlem Filali
Ahlem Filali
YFYannick Fayolle
Yannick Fayolle
SGSabrina Guerin
Sabrina Guerin
VRVincent Rocher
Vincent Rocher
Sylvie GillotSylvie Gillot
Sylvie Gillot