Carlotta Galeone

Dr. Carlotta Galeone

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

24Years (2003-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
25 November 2014 in British Journal of Cancer
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
VBVincenzo Bagnardi
Vincenzo Bagnardi
Matteo RotaMatteo Rota
Matteo Rota
EBEdoardo Botteri
Edoardo Botteri
ITI Tramacere
I Tramacere
FIFarhad Islami
Farhad Islami
Carlo La VecchiaCarlo La Vecchia
Carlo La Vecchia
Alcohol is a risk factor for cancer of the oral cavity, pharynx, oesophagus, colorectum, liver, larynx and female breast, whereas its impact on other cancers remains controversial. We investigated the effect of alcohol on 23 cancer types through a meta-analytic approach. We used dose–response meta-regression models and investigated potential sources of heterogeneity. A total of 572 studies, including 486 538 cancer cases, were identified. Relative risks (RRs) for heavy drinkers compared with nondrinkers and occasional drinkers were 5.13 for oral and pharyngeal cancer, 4.95 for oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma, 1.44 for colorectal, 2.65 for laryngeal and 1.61 for breast cancer; for those neoplasms there was a clear dose–risk relationship. Heavy drinkers also had a significantly higher risk of cancer of the stomach (RR 1.21), liver (2.07), gallbladder (2.64), pancreas (1.19) and lung (1.15). There was indication of a positive association between alcohol consumption and risk of melanoma and prostate cancer. Alcohol consumption and risk of Hodgkin’s and Non-Hodgkin’s lymphomas were inversely associated. Alcohol increases risk of cancer of oral cavity and pharynx, oesophagus, colorectum, liver, larynx and female breast. There is accumulating evidence that alcohol drinking is associated with some other cancers such as pancreas and prostate cancer and melanoma.

1 May 2012 in European Journal Of Cancer Prevention
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
UPUgo Pastorino
Ugo Pastorino
MRMarta Rossi
Marta Rossi
VRValentina Rosato
Valentina Rosato
AMAlfonso Marchianò
Alfonso Marchianò
NSNicola Sverzellati
Nicola Sverzellati
Carlo La VecchiaCarlo La Vecchia
Carlo La Vecchia
The efficacy and cost-effectiveness of low-dose spiral computed tomography (LDCT) screening in heavy smokers is currently under evaluation worldwide. Our screening program started with a pilot study on 1035 volunteers in Milan in 2000 and was followed up in 2005 by a randomized trial comparing annual or biennial LDCT with observation, named Multicentric Italian Lung Detection. This included 4099 participants, 1723 randomized to the control group, 1186 to biennial LDCT screening, and 1190 to annual LDCT screening. Follow-up was stopped in November 2011, with 9901 person-years for the pilot study and 17 621 person-years for Multicentric Italian Lung Detection. Forty-nine lung cancers were detected by LDCT (20 in biennial and 29 in the annual arm), of which 17 were identified at baseline examination; 63% were of stage I and 84% were surgically resectable. Stage distribution and resection rates were similar in the two LDCT arms. The cumulative 5-year lung cancer incidence rate was 311/100 000 in the control group, 457 in the biennial, and 620 in the annual LDCT group (P=0.036); lung cancer mortality rates were 109, 109, and 216/100 000 (P=0.21), and total mortality rates were 310, 363, and 558/100 000, respectively (P=0.13). Total mortality in the pilot study was similar to that observed in the annual LDCT arm at 5 years. There was no evidence of a protective effect of annual or biennial LDCT screening. Furthermore, a meta-analysis of the four published randomized trials showed similar overall mortality in the LDCT arms compared with the control arm.

1 April 2012 in Clinical Microbiology and Infection
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CPClaudio Pelucchi
Claudio Pelucchi
LGL. Grigoryan
L. Grigoryan
CGCarlotta Galeone
Carlotta Galeone
Susanna EspositoSusanna Esposito
Susanna Esposito
PHP. Huovinen
P. Huovinen
TVT. Verheij
T. Verheij
Acute sore throat is a symptom often caused by an inflammatory process in the pharynx, tonsils or nasopharynx. Most of these cases are of viral origin and occur as a part of the common cold. Adults average two to four and children six to eight upper respiratory tract infections per year usually during the colder months of the year. In addition to viral pathogens, bacterial pathogens may also cause pharyngeal infections. These pathogens include Streptococcus pyogenes (group A β-haemolytic streptococcus), but groups C or G β-haemolytic streptococci as well as Mycoplasma pneumoniae and Chlamydia pneumoniae have also been suggested to be pathogens. Although rare today in Europe, streptococcal pharyngitis can be complicated by acute rheumatic fever or acute glomerulonephritis. Fear of these complications, or a wish to relieve pain or to satisfy patients often lead physicians to use antibiotic treatment for sore throat.

1 May 2012 in Epidemiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CPClaudio Pelucchi
Claudio Pelucchi
LCLiliane Chatenoud
Liliane Chatenoud
FTFederica Turati
Federica Turati
CGCarlotta Galeone
Carlotta Galeone
LMLorenzo Moja
Lorenzo Moja
Carlo La VecchiaCarlo La Vecchia
Carlo La Vecchia
The study of probiotics to prevent allergic conditions has yielded conflicting results in children. We undertook a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials to investigate whether probiotic use during pregnancy and early life decreases the incidence of atopic dermatitis and immunoglobulin E (IgE)-associated atopic dermatitis in infants and young children. We performed a systematic literature search in Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Library, updated to October 2011. The intervention was diet supplementation with probiotics versus placebo. Primary outcomes were incidence of atopic dermatitis and IgE-associated atopic dermatitis. We calculated summary relative risks (RRs) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs), using both fixed- and random-effects models. We computed summary estimates across several strata, including study period, type of patient, dose, and duration of intervention, and we assessed the risk of bias within and across trials. We identified 18 publications based on 14 studies. Meta-analysis demonstrated that probiotic use decreased the incidence of atopic dermatitis (RR = 0.79 [95% CI = 0.71−0.88]). Studies were fairly homogeneous (I2 = 24.0%). The corresponding RR of IgE-associated atopic dermatitis was 0.80 (95% CI = 0.66−0.96). No appreciable difference emerged across strata, nor was there evidence of publication bias. This meta-analysis provided evidence in support of a moderate role of probiotics in the prevention of atopic dermatitis and IgE-associated atopic dermatitis in infants. The favorable effect was similar regardless of the time of probiotic use (pregnancy or early life) or the subject(s) receiving probiotics (mother, child, or both).

19 March 2008 in BJU International
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
FLFabio Levi
Fabio Levi
JFJacques Ferlay
Jacques Ferlay
CGCarlotta Galeone
Carlotta Galeone
FLFranca Lucchini
Franca Lucchini
ENEva Negri
Eva Negri
Carlo La VecchiaCarlo La Vecchia
Carlo La Vecchia
OBJECTIVE: To update trends in kidney cancer mortality in 32 European countries and the European Union (EU) as a whole, as mortality from kidney cancer has increased throughout Europe until the late 1980s or early 1990s, and has tended to stabilise or decline thereafter. METHODS: Data from the World Health Organization mortality database over the period 1980–2004 were used to compute age‐specific and age‐standardized (world standard) rates per 100 000 persons at all ages, and truncated to 35–64 years. RESULTS: In men in the EU, mortality rates from kidney cancer peaked at 4.8 per 100 000 in 1990–1994, and declined to 4.1 (−13%) in 2000–2004. In women in the EU, the corresponding values were 2.1 in 1990–1994 and 1.8 (−17%) in 2000–2004. The main decreases were in Scandinavian countries, and other western European countries. In most eastern European countries kidney mortality rates tended to stabilise, even if values remained high, especially in the Czech Republic and Baltic countries. For kidney cancer incidence, there were decreases in rates for both sexes in Sweden throughout the 25‐year calendar period considered. In the last 10 years considered, incidence rates decreased or tended to stabilise also in other northern European countries in both sexes, except in the UK. CONCLUSION: The present work confirms and further quantifies the recent favourable trends in kidney cancer mortality and (to a lesser degree) in incidence across most European countries. Thus, improvements in diagnosis and treatments cannot largely explain the declines in mortality. Apart from a favourable role of reduced tobacco smoking in men, the interpretation of these trends remains undefined.

14 March 2014 in Annals of Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
FTFederica Turati
Federica Turati
CGCarlotta Galeone
Carlotta Galeone
Matteo RotaMatteo Rota
Matteo Rota
CPClaudio Pelucchi
Claudio Pelucchi
ENEva Negri
Eva Negri
Carlo La VecchiaCarlo La Vecchia
Carlo La Vecchia
Despite several studies support a positive association between heavy alcohol consumption and liver cancer risk, a consistent dose–risk relationship has not yet been established. We carried out a systematic review and a meta-analysis of the association between alcohol intake and liver cancer occurrence, following the Meta-analysis Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology guidelines. We searched for cohort and nested case–control studies on the general population published before April 2013, using PubMed and EMBASE. Summary meta-analytic relative risks (RRs) were estimated using random-effect models. We included 16 articles (19 cohorts) for a total of 4445 incident cases and 5550 deaths from liver cancer. Compared with non-drinking, the pooled RRs were 0.91 (95% confidence interval, CI, 0.81–1.02) for moderate drinking (<3 drinks per day) and 1.16 (95% CI, 1.01–1.34) for heavy drinking (≥3 drinks per day), with significant heterogeneity among studies. The dose–risk curve suggested a linear relationship with increasing alcohol intake in drinkers, with estimated excess risk of 46% for 50 g of ethanol per day and 66% for 100 g per day. This systematic review suggests a moderate detrimental role of consumption of 3 or more alcoholic drinks per day on liver cancer, and a lack of association with moderate drinking. Our results have to be taken with due caution on account of the possible limitations of the original studies included in the meta-analysis.