Autonomous vehicles (AVs), defined as vehicles capable of navigation and decision-making independent of human intervention, represent a revolutionary advancement in transportation technology. These vehicles operate by synthesizing an array of sophisticated technologies, including sensors, cameras, GPS, radar, light imaging detection and ranging (LiDAR), and advanced computing systems. These components work in concert to accurately perceive the vehicle’s environment, ensuring the capacity to make optimal decisions in real-time. At the heart of AV functionality lies the ability to facilitate intercommunication between vehicles and with critical road infrastructure—a characteristic that, while central to their efficacy, also renders them susceptible to cyber threats. The potential infiltration of these communication channels poses a severe threat, enabling the possibility of personal information theft or the introduction of malicious software that could compromise vehicle safety. This paper offers a comprehensive exploration of the current state of AV technology, particularly examining the intersection of autonomous vehicles and emotional intelligence. We delve into an extensive analysis of recent research on safety lapses and security vulnerabilities in autonomous vehicles, placing specific emphasis on the different types of cyber attacks to which they are susceptible. We further explore the various security solutions that have been proposed and implemented to address these threats. The discussion not only provides an overview of the existing challenges but also presents a pathway toward future research directions. This includes potential advancements in the AV field, the continued refinement of safety measures, and the development of more robust, resilient security mechanisms. Ultimately, this paper seeks to contribute to a deeper understanding of the safety and security landscape of autonomous vehicles, fostering discourse on the intricate balance between technological advancement and security in this rapidly evolving field.

In the context of the Internet of Things (IoT), Tiny Machine Learning (TinyML) and Big Data, enhanced by Edge Artificial Intelligence, are essential for effectively managing the extensive data produced by numerous connected devices. Our study introduces a set of TinyML algorithms designed and developed to improve Big Data management in large-scale IoT systems. These algorithms, named TinyCleanEDF, EdgeClusterML, CompressEdgeML, CacheEdgeML, and TinyHybridSenseQ, operate together to enhance data processing, storage, and quality control in IoT networks, utilizing the capabilities of Edge AI. In particular, TinyCleanEDF applies federated learning for Edge-based data cleaning and anomaly detection. EdgeClusterML combines reinforcement learning with self-organizing maps for effective data clustering. CompressEdgeML uses neural networks for adaptive data compression. CacheEdgeML employs predictive analytics for smart data caching, and TinyHybridSenseQ concentrates on data quality evaluation and hybrid storage strategies. Our experimental evaluation of the proposed techniques includes executing all the algorithms in various numbers of Raspberry Pi devices ranging from one to ten. The experimental results are promising as we outperform similar methods across various evaluation metrics. Ultimately, we anticipate that the proposed algorithms offer a comprehensive and efficient approach to managing the complexities of IoT, Big Data, and Edge AI.

In this study, we introduce FLIBD, a novel strategy for managing Internet of Things (IoT) Big Data, intricately designed to ensure privacy preservation across extensive system networks. By utilising Federated Learning (FL), Apache Spark, and Federated AI Technology Enabler (FATE), we skilfully investigated the complicated area of IoT data management while simultaneously reinforcing privacy across broad network configurations. Our FLIBD architecture was thoughtfully designed to safeguard data and model privacy through a synergistic integration of distributed model training and secure model consolidation. Notably, we delved into an in-depth examination of adversarial activities within federated learning contexts. The Federated Adversarial Attack for Multi-Task Learning (FAAMT) was thoroughly assessed, unmasking its proficiency in showcasing and exploiting vulnerabilities across various federated learning approaches. Moreover, we offer an incisive evaluation of numerous federated learning defence mechanisms, including Romoa and RFA, in the scope of the FAAMT. Utilising well-defined evaluation metrics and analytical processes, our study demonstrated a resilient framework suitable for managing IoT Big Data across widespread deployments, while concurrently presenting a solid contribution to the progression and discussion surrounding defensive methodologies within the federated learning and IoT areas.

In this work, we present a principled framework for the deployment of Large Language Models (LLMs) in enterprise big data management across digital governance, marketing, and accounting domains. Unlike conventional predictive applications, our approach integrates LLMs as auditable, sector-adaptive components that robustly and directly enhance data curation, lineage, and regulatory compliance. The study contributes (i) a systematic evaluation of seven LLM-enabled functions—including schema mapping, entity resolution, and document extraction—that directly improve data quality and operational governance; (ii) a distributed architecture that deploys Apache Spark orchestration with Markov Chain Monte Carlo sampling to achieve quantifiable uncertainty and reproducible audit trails; and (iii) a cross-sector analysis demonstrating robust semantic accuracy, compliance management, and explainable outputs suited to diverse assurance requirements. Empirical evaluations reveal that the proposed architecture persistently attains elevated mapping precision, resilient multimodal feature extraction, and consistent human supervision. These characteristics collectively reinforce the integrity, accountability, and transparency of information ecosystems, particularly within compliance-driven organizational settings.

Background: Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) is deployed in Internet of Things (IoT) ecosystems for smart cities and precision agriculture, where opaque models can compromise trust, accountability, and regulatory compliance. Objective: This survey investigates how XAI is currently integrated into distributed and federated IoT architectures and identifies systematic gaps in evaluation under real-world resource constraints. Methods: A structured search across IEEE Xplore, ACM Digital Library, ScienceDirect, SpringerLink, and Google Scholar targeted publications related to XAI, IoT, edge/fog computing, smart cities, smart agriculture, and federated learning. Relevant peer-reviewed works were synthesized along three dimensions: deployment tier (device, edge/fog, cloud), explanation scope (local vs. global), and validation methodology. Results: The analysis reveals a persistent resource–interpretability gap: computationally intensive explainers are frequently applied on constrained edge and federated platforms without explicitly accounting for latency, memory footprint, or energy consumption. Only a minority of studies quantify privacy–utility effects or address causal attribution in sensor-rich environments, limiting the reliability of explanations in safety- and mission-critical IoT applications. Contribution: To address these shortcomings, the survey introduces a hardware-centric evaluation framework with the Computational Complexity Score (CCS), Memory Footprint Ratio (MFR), and Privacy–Utility Trade-off (PUT) metrics and proposes a hierarchical IoT–XAI reference architecture, together with the conceptual Internet of Things Interpretability Evaluation Standard (IOTIES) for cross-domain assessment. Conclusions: The findings indicate that IoT–XAI research must shift from accuracy-only reporting to lightweight, model-agnostic, and privacy-aware explanation pipelines that are explicitly budgeted for edge resources and aligned with the needs of heterogeneous stakeholders in smart city and agricultural deployments.

During the last decade, artificial intelligence (AI) has enabled key technological innovations within the modern dementia and frailty healthcare and prevention landscape. This has boosted the impact of technology in the clinical setting, enabling earlier diagnosis with improved specificity and sensitivity, leading to accurate and time-efficient support that has driven the development of preventative interventions minimizing the risk and rate of progression. Background/Objectives: The rapid ageing of the European population places a substantial strain on the current healthcare system and imposes several challenges. COMFORTage is the joint effort of medical experts (i.e., neurologists, psychiatrists, neuropsychologists, nurses, and memory clinics), social scientists and humanists, technical experts (i.e., data scientists, AI experts, and robotic experts), digital innovation hubs (DIHs), and living labs (LLs) to establish a pan-European framework for community-based, integrated, and people-centric prevention, monitoring, and progression-managing solutions for dementia and frailty. Its main goal is to introduce an integrated and digitally enabled framework that will facilitate the provision of personalized and integrated care prevention and intervention strategies on dementia and frailty, by piloting novel technologies and producing quantified evidence on the impact to individuals’ wellbeing and quality of life. Methods: A robust and comprehensive design approach adopted through this framework provides the guidelines, tools, and methodologies necessary to empower stakeholders by enhancing their health and digital literacy. The integration of the initial information from 13 pilots across 8 European countries demonstrates the scalability and adaptability of this approach across diverse healthcare systems. Through a systematic analysis, it aims to streamline healthcare processes, reduce health inequalities in modern communities, and foster healthy and active ageing by leveraging evidence-based insights and real-world implementations across multiple regions. Results: Emerging technologies are integrated with societal and clinical innovations, as well as with advanced and evidence-based care models, toward the introduction of a comprehensive global coordination framework that: (a) improves individuals’ adherence to risk mitigation and prevention strategies; (b) delivers targeted and personalized recommendations; (c) supports societal, lifestyle, and behavioral changes; (d) empowers individuals toward their health and digital literacy; and (e) fosters inclusiveness and promotes equality of access to health and care services. Conclusions: The proposed framework is designed to enable earlier diagnosis and improved prognosis coupled with personalized prevention interventions. It capitalizes on the integration of technical, clinical, and social innovations and is deployed in 13 real-world pilots to empirically assess its potential impact, ensuring robust validation across diverse healthcare settings.