The ability of contrast-enhanced MRI to distinguish between malignant and benign ovarian masses is limited. The aim of this meta-analysis is to evaluate the diagnostic performance of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in differentiating malignant from benign ovarian masses. A comprehensive literature search was performed in several authoritative databases to identify relevant articles. The weighted mean difference (WMD) and corresponding 95% confidence interval (95% CI) were calculated. We also used subgroup analysis to analyze study heterogeneity, and evaluated publication bias. The meta-analysis is based on 21 studies, which reported the findings for 731 malignant and 918 benign ovarian masses. There was no significant difference in apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values for DWI between benign and malignant lesions (WMD = 0.22, 95% CI = -0.02–0.47, p = 0.08). Subgroup analysis by benign tumor type revealed higher ADC values (or a trend toward higher values) for cysts, cystadenomas and other benign tumors compared to malignant masses (cyst: WMD = 0.54, 95% CI = -0.05–1.12, p = 0.07; cystadenoma: WMD = 0.73, 95% CI = 0.38–1.07, p < 0.0001; other benign tumor: WMD = 0.16, 95% CI = -0.13–0.46, p = 0.28). On the other hand, lower ADC values (or a trend toward lower values) were observed for endometrioma and teratoma compared to malignant masses (endometrioma: WMD = -0.09, 95% CI = -0.47–0.29, p = 0.64; teratoma: WMD = -0.49, 95% CI = -0.85–0.12, p = 0.009). Subgroup analysis by mass property revealed higher ADC values in cystic tumor types than in solid types for both benign and malignant tumors. Significant study heterogeneity was observed. There was no notable publication bias. Quantitative DWI is not a reliable diagnostic method for differentiation between benign and malignant ovarian masses. This knowledge is essential in avoiding misdiagnosis of ovarian masses.

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) enables the assessment of real-time renal microcirculation. This study investigated CEUS-driven parameters as hemodynamic predictors for renal outcomes in patients with acute kidney injury (AKI). Forty-eight patients who were diagnosed with AKI were prospectively enrolled and underwent CEUS at the occurrence of AKI. Parameters measured were the wash-in slope (WIS), time to peak intensity, peak intensity (PI), area under the time–intensity curve (AUC), mean transit time (MTT), time for full width at half maximum, and rise time (RT). The predictive performance of the CEUS-driven parameters for Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) AKI stage, initiation of renal replacement therapy (RRT), AKI recovery, and chronic kidney disease (CKD) progression was assessed. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of CEUS. Cortical RT (Odds ratio [OR] = 1.21) predicted the KDIGO stage 3 AKI. Cortical MTT (OR = 1.07) and RT (OR = 1.20) predicted the initiation of RRT. Cortical WIS (OR = 76.23) and medullary PI (OR = 1.25) predicted AKI recovery. Medullary PI (OR = 0.78) and AUC (OR = 1.00) predicted CKD progression. The areas under the ROC curves showed reasonable performance for predicting the initiation of RRT and AKI recovery. The sensitivity and specificity of the quantitative CEUS parameters were 60–83% and 62–77%, respectively, with an area under the curve of 0.69–0.75. CEUS may be a supplemental tool in diagnosing the severity of AKI and predicting renal prognosis in patients with AKI.

Kim H, et al. Korean J Radiol. 2024 Jan;25(1):43-54. https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2023.0760

Youn SY, et al. Korean J Radiol. 2021 May;22:e66. https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2020.1394