John Barton

Dr. John Barton

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

30Years (1997-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 November 2014 in Technological Forecasting and Social Change
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
ETE. (Evelina) Trutnevyte
E. (Evelina) Trutnevyte
JBJohn Barton
John Barton
ÁOÁine O'GRady
Áine O'GRady
DODamiete Ogunkunle
Damiete Ogunkunle
DPDanny Pudjianto
Danny Pudjianto
ERElizabeth Robertson
Elizabeth Robertson
State-of-the-art scenario exercises in the energy and environment fields argue for combining qualitative storylines with quantitative modelling. This paper proposes an approach for linking a highly detailed storyline with multiple, diverse models. This approach is illustrated through a cross-scale study of the UK power system transition until 2050. The storyline, called Central Co-ordination, is linked with insights from six power system models and two appraisal techniques. First, the storyline is ‘translated’ into harmonised assumptions on power system targets for the models. Then, a new concept called the landscape of models is introduced. This landscape helps to map the key fields of expertise of individual models, including their temporal, spatial and disciplinary foci. The storyline is then assessed based on the cross-scale modelling results. While the storyline is important for transmitting information about governance and the choices of key actors, many targets aspired in it are inconsistent with modelling results. The storyline overestimates demand reduction levels, uptake of marine renewables and irreplaceability of carbon capture and storage. It underestimates the supply–demand balancing challenge, the need for back-up capacity and the role of nuclear power and interconnectors with Europe. Thus, iteratively linking storylines and models is key

1 December 2010 in Journal of Power Sources
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JBJohn Barton
John Barton
RGRupert Gammon
Rupert Gammon

1 February 2018 in Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
JBJohn Barton
John Barton
LDLloyd Davies
Lloyd Davies
BDBen Dooley
Ben Dooley
TFTimothy J. Foxon
Timothy J. Foxon
SGStuart Galloway
Stuart Galloway
MTMurray Thomson
Murray Thomson
This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/BY-NC-ND/4.0/) This is an extended and updated version of a paper originally presented\ud at the 10th Conference on Sustainable Development of Energy, Water\ud and Environment Systems (SDEWES 2015) held in Dubrovnik, Croatia over\ud the period 27 September – 2 October 2015 (denoted then as paper\ud SDEWES2015.00656)

1 November 2015 in Energy Policy
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
SGS.D. Garvey
S.D. Garvey
PEP.C. Eames
P.C. Eames
Jihong WangJihong Wang
Jihong Wang
APA.J. Pimm
A.J. Pimm
MWM. Waterson
M. Waterson
JGJ.E. Garvey
J.E. Garvey
Generation-integrated energy storage (GIES) systems store energy at some point along the transformation between the primary energy form and electricity. Instances exist already in natural hydro power, biomass generation, wave power, and concentrated solar power. GIES systems have been proposed for wind, nuclear power and they arise naturally in photocatalysis systems that are in development. GIES systems can compare very favourably in both performance and total cost against equivalent non-integrated systems comprising both generation and storage. Despite this, they have not hitherto been recognised as a discrete class of systems. Consequently policy decisions affecting development or demonstration projects and policy approaches concerning low-carbon generation are not fully informed. This paper highlights that policy structures exist militating against the development and introduction of GIES systems-probably to the detriment of overall system good

1 February 2022 in Energy for Sustainable Development
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SFSheridan Few
Sheridan Few
JBJohn Barton
John Barton
PSPhilip Sandwell
Philip Sandwell
RMRichard Mori
Richard Mori
PKPrasad Kulkarni
Prasad Kulkarni
CCChiara Candelise
Chiara Candelise

23 December 2020 in IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
GRGautam Anil Raiker
Gautam Anil Raiker
SBSubba Reddy B.
Subba Reddy B.
ULUmanand Loganathan
Umanand Loganathan
SAShubham Agrawal
Shubham Agrawal
ATAnchal S. Thakur
Anchal S. Thakur
MTMurray Thomson
Murray Thomson
Energy Management Systems involve monitoring of loads, control, and providing recommendations to reduce demand or energy costs. Energy Disaggregation works on monitoring loads non-intrusively, by having a single smart meter at the entry point to perform the task with machine learning techniques. Training of the machine learning model is an important step and may require historical sub-metered data of the appliances. In this paper, an Energy Demand model is used to generate the training data and alleviate the need for historical data of the appliance. The model is optimized for the Indian scenario based on the representation of appliances and active occupancy. The other important contribution of the present work is the use of Internet of Things (IoT) Devices to feed observable states to the Disaggregation model to improve efficiency. A selectively enabled Factorial Hidden Markov Model is utilized in which states of IoT control relays are presented to the model. The platform developed, enables both monitoring and control of appliances and provides insight into the overall user energy consumption and its breakdown at the appliance level.