Sleep is essential for life, and inappropriate sleep duration patterns may lead to chronic consequences regarding human health. Several studies have confirmed the presence of a U-shaped association between sleep duration and mortality. Moreover, many consequences related to cardiometabolic aspects have been suggested in patients with abnormal sleep durations. In this study, we analyzed the associations between sleep duration, total sleep time (TST), the risk of all-cause mortality, and 10-year cardiovascular risk in a cohort of patients at a sleep medicine center in Santiago, Chile. We conducted a prospective cohort study of patients (SantOSA). A short TST was defined as 6 h, a normal TST as 6 to 9 h, and a long TST as 9 h. Adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) for all-cause mortality were calculated. A cross-sectional analysis between TST and 10-year cardiovascular risk (calculated using the Framingham 2008 formula) was determined using logistic regression models. A total of 1385 subjects were included in the results (78% male; median age: 53, interquartile range (IQR): 42–64 years; median BMI: 29.5, IQR: 16.7–33.1). A total of 333 subjects (24%) reported short TSTs, 938 (67.7%) reported normal TSTs, and 114 (8.3%) reported long TSTs. In the fully adjusted model, the association remained significant for short (aHR: 2.51 (1.48–4.25); p-value = 0.01) and long TSTs (aHR: 3.97 (1.53–10.29); p-value = 0.04). Finally, a U-shaped association was found between short and long TSTs, with an increase in cardiovascular risk at 10 years. Compared with normal TSTs, short (6 h) and long (9 h) TSTs were significantly associated with all-cause mortality and increased 10-year cardiovascular risk.
Objective: To describe the prevalence and severity of sleep disorders and circadian alterations in COVID-19 patients four months after the acute phase of the disease. Methods: This was a cross-sectional observational prospective study of patients with mild COVID-19, moderate COVID-19 (requiring hospitalization but no mechanical ventilation), or severe COVID-19 (with ARDS) four months after the acute phase of the disease. All patients underwent a home sleep apnea test and seven-day wrist actigraphy, as well as completing questionnaires to assess sleep quality and mental health. Differences among the three groups of patients were evaluated by ANOVA and the chi-square test. Results: A total of 60 patients were included in the study. Of those, 17 were in the mild COVID-19 group, 18 were in the moderate COVID-19 group, and 25 were in the severe COVID-19 group. Sleep quality, as assessed by satisfaction, alertness, timing, efficiency, and duration scale scores, was found to be impaired in all three groups, which also had a high prevalence of unhealthy sleep, as assessed by the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index. The prevalence of insomnia was increased in all three groups, as assessed by the Insomnia Severity Index. The home sleep apnea test showed that the overall prevalence of obstructive sleep apnea was 60%, and seven-day wrist actigraphy showed that total sleep time was < 7 h in all three groups. Changes in quality of life and in the circadian rest-activity pattern were observed in all three groups. Conclusions: Sleep-related symptoms, changes in the circadian rest-activity pattern, and impaired mental health appear to be common in COVID-19 patients four months after the acute phase of the disease, severe COVID-19 being associated with a higher prevalence of obstructive sleep apnea. Keywords: Sleep apnea, obstructive; Sleep disorders, circadian rhythm; COVID-19.
Objetivo: Analizar la asociación entre problemas de sueño y el rendimiento académico en escolares de segundo ciclo. Sujetos y Método: Investigación analítica y transversal. Fueron reclutados 733 escolares de 5to a 8vo año básico de establecimientos educativos públicos pertenecientes al estudio Encuesta de salud y rendimiento escolar de la provincia del Biobío 2018. Los problemas de sueño fueron auto reportados a través del cuestionario de autoinforme de sueño infantil. El rendimiento escolar fue medido con las calificaciones en las asignaturas de lenguaje, matemáticas, educación física, promedio general y a través de la percepción de las funciones cognitivas en el contexto escolar. Resultados: Un 81,9% de los escolares indicaron problemas de rutinas para ir a dormir. Los escolares con problemas de sueño, de ambos sexos, presentan mayores problemas de memoria, más lentitud para resolver problemas matemáticos, más dificultades para mantener la atención en clases, más problemas para resolver tareas complejas y más nerviosismo durante una prueba que los escolares sin problemas de sueño. Además, los escolares con problemas de sueño tuvieron notas más bajas en el promedio general y las asignaturas de matemáticas, lenguaje y educación física que los escolares sin problemas de sueño. Conclusión: Se pesquisó alta prevalencia de problemas de rutina para ir a dormir, Además, se evidenció una asociación entre problemas de sueño con un menor rendimiento escolar y peor percepción de las funciones cognitivas en escolares de segundo ciclo de ambos sexos. Implementar planes de promoción de salud, enfocados en higiene de sueño, en centros educativos podría favorecer un mejor rendimiento escolar.
Objective To evaluate the clinical utility of the Baveno classification in predicting incident cardiovascular mortality after five years of follow-up in a clinic-based cohort of patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Materials and Methods We evaluated the reproducibility of the Baveno classification using data from the Santiago Obstructive Sleep Apnea (SantOSA) study. The groups were labeled Baveno A (minor symptoms and comorbidities), B (severe symptoms and minor comorbidities), C (minor symptoms and severe comorbidities), and D (severe symptoms and comorbidities). Within-group comparisons were performed using analysis of variance (ANOVA) and post hoc tests. The associations between groups and incident cardiovascular mortality were determined through the Mantel-Cox and Cox proportional hazard ratios (HRs) adjusted by covariables. Results A total of 1,300 OSA patients were included (Baveno A: 27.7%; B: 28%; C: 16.8%; and D: 27.5%). The follow-up was of 5.4 years. Compared to Baveno A, the fully-adjusted risk of cardiovascular mortality with Baveno B presented an HR of 1.38 (95% confidence interval [95%CI]: 0.14–13.5; p = 0.78); with Baveno C, it was of 1.71 (95%CI: 0.18–16.2; p = 0.63); and, with Baveno D, of 1.04 (95%CI: 0.12–9.2; p = 0.98). We found no interactions involving Baveno group, sex and OSA severity. Discussion Among OSA patients, the Baveno classification can describe different subgroups. However, its utility in identifying incident cardiovascular mortality is unclear. Long-term follow-up studies and the inclusion of demographic variables in the classification could improve its ability to detect a high-risk phenotype associated with cardiovascular mortality. Conclusion The Baveno classification serves as a valuable method for categorizing varying groups of patients afflicted with OSA. Nevertheless, its precision in identifying occurrence of cardiovascular mortality is still unclear.
Sleep and circadian rhythms are markedly altered in intensive care unit (ICU) patients. Numerous factors related to the patient and the ICU environment affect the ability to initiate and maintain sleep. Therefore, nonpharmacological interventions could play an essential role in improving sleep and circadian rhythm. The aim of this study was to examine nonpharmacological interventions evaluated for promoting sleep in adult ICUs. A scoping review was conducted, including randomised controlled trials, nonrandomised controlled trials, quasi-experimental trials, and other controlled studies investigating the effects of nonpharmacological interventions promoting sleep in adult ICU patients. A total of 57 articles and 14 ongoing trials were included in the review, of which 38 were randomised clinical trials. Nine nonpharmacological interventions to improve sleep in critically ill patients were evaluated: earplugs and/or eye masks, aromatherapy, bundles, music intervention, massage or acupressure, noise masking, bright light, and dynamic light. Most included trials simultaneously assessed the effect of more than one intervention on perceived sleep quality using questionnaires. The association between the interventions and improved sleep varied. In the case of multicomponent interventions, it is difficult to identify which components might have influenced sleep improvement. Numerous studies have evaluated various nonpharmacological interventions to promote sleep in critically ill patients, several of which improved perceived sleep quality. However, the substantial variability of the assessed interventions and their implementation complicates drawing reliable conclusions. The protocol for this scoping review was registered with the Open Science Framework under the identifier https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/MPEQ5.