Background: High-grade neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) comprise both well-differentiated grade 3 neuroendocrine tumors (G3 NETs) and poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs). Mixed neuroendocrine–non-neuroendocrine neoplasms (MiNENs) nearly always include poorly differentiated NEC as the neuroendocrine component. The efficacy and safety of frontline mFOLFIRINOX chemotherapy has never been investigated in patients with high-grade NENs. Patients and Methods: We conducted a multi-institutional retrospective analysis of patients with advanced high-grade NEN of the gastroenteropancreatic tract or of unknown origin seen between February 2016 and April 2023 who received treatment with frontline mFOLFIRINOX. Results: A total of 35 patients were included (G3 NETs: n=2; NECs: n=25; MiNENs: n=8; stage III: n=5; stage IV: n=30). The objective response rate was 77% (complete response: 3%; partial response: 74%). Median progression-free survival was 12 months (95% CI, 9.2–16.2 months) and median overall survival was 20.6 months (95% CI, 17.2–30.6 months). No significant differences in efficacy were seen according to primary site, histopathology, and Ki-67 proliferative index. All 5 patients with stage III disease who received mFOLFIRINOX obtained an objective response and underwent radical surgery or definitive radiotherapy with curative intent, with a recurrence rate of 40%. Grade 3 or 4 adverse events were observed in 43% of patients (mainly neutropenia and diarrhea). Females were at significantly increased risk of developing severe toxicities. Conclusions: mFOLFIRINOX shows antitumor activity against high-grade NENs. Well-designed, prospective clinical trials are needed to assess the efficacy of mFOLFIRINOX in both the neoadjuvant and metastatic settings.

Epigenetic dysregulation has long been recognized as a significant contributor to tumorigenesis and tumor maintenance, impacting all recognized cancer hallmarks. Although some epigenetic drugs have received regulatory approval for certain hematological malignancies, their efficacy in treating solid tumors has so far been largely disappointing. However, recent advancements in developing new compounds and a deeper understanding of cancer biology have led to success in specific solid tumor subtypes through precision medicine approaches. Moreover, epigenetic drugs may play a crucial role in synergizing with other anticancer treatments, enhancing the sensitivity of cancer cells to various anticancer therapies, including chemotherapy, radiation therapy, hormone therapy, targeted therapy, and immunotherapy. In this review, we critically evaluate the evolution of epigenetic drugs, tracing their development from initial use as monotherapies to their current application in combination therapies. We explore the preclinical rationale, completed clinical studies, and ongoing clinical trials. Finally, we discuss trial design strategies and drug scheduling to optimize the development of possible combination therapies.

On February 23rd, the 1st case of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection was diagnosed at the University Hospital Trust of Verona, Italy. On March 13th, the Oncology Section was converted into a 22-inpatient bed coronavirus disease (COVID) Unit, and we reshaped our organisation to face the SARS-CoV-2 epidemic, while maintaining oncological activities. We tracked down (i) volumes of oncological activities (January 1st - March 31st, 2020 versus the same period of 2019), (ii) patients' and caregivers' perception and (iii) SARS-CoV-2 infection rate in oncology health professionals and SARS-CoV-2 infection-related hospital admissions of "active"' oncological patients. As compared with the same trimester in 2019, the overall reduction in total numbers of inpatient admissions, chemotherapy administrations and specialist visits in January-March 2020 was 8%, 6% and 3%, respectively; based on the weekly average of daily accesses, reduction in some of the oncological activities became statistically significant from week 11. The overall acceptance of adopted measures, as measured by targeted questionnaires administered to a sample of 241 outpatients, was high (>70%). Overall, 8 of 85 oncology health professionals tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 infection (all but one employed in the COVID Unit, no hospital admissions and no treatment required); among 471 patients admitted for SARS-CoV-2 infection, 7 had an "active"' oncological disease (2 died of infection-related complications). A slight, but statistically significant reduction in oncology activity was registered during the SARS-CoV-2 epidemic peak in Verona, Italy. Organisational and protective measures adopted appear to have contributed to keep infections in both oncological patients and health professionals to a minimum.

Precision medicine in oncology has made significant progress in recent years by approving drugs that target specific genetic mutations. However, many cancer driver genes remain challenging to pharmacologically target (“undruggable”). To tackle this issue, RNA-based methods like antisense oligonucleotides (ASOs) that induce targeted exon skipping (ES) could provide a promising alternative. In this work, a comprehensive computational procedure is presented, focused on the development of ES-based cancer treatments. The procedure aims to produce specific protein variants, including inactive oncogenes and partially restored tumor suppressors. This novel computational procedure encompasses target-exon selection, in silico prediction of ES products, and identification of the best candidate ASOs for further experimental validation. The method was effectively employed on extensively mutated cancer genes, prioritized according to their suitability for ES-based interventions. Notable genes, such as NRAS and VHL, exhibited potential for this therapeutic approach, as specific target exons were identified and optimal ASO sequences were devised to induce their skipping. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first computational procedure that encompasses all necessary steps for designing ASO sequences tailored for targeted ES, contributing with a versatile and innovative approach to addressing the challenges posed by undruggable cancer driver genes and beyond.

Early phase clinical trials assessing targeted therapies have historically been associated with a wide range of efficacy rates and toxicities. Recently, the implementation of molecular prescreening programs and the development of more selective and potent targeted agents may associate with improved outcomes. We analyzed patient-level data from the 360 RESISTANCE (360R), a prospective study evaluating the outcomes of patients treated with targeted therapies in early phase clinical trials at Vall d´Hebron University Hospital. Objective response rate (ORR) was the primary endpoint. We also aimed to evaluate trends in efficacy and toxicity of targeted therapies over time by analyzing the ratio of progression-free survival (PFS) in early phase clinical trial (PFS2) over PFS on prior therapy (PFS1). Between 2015 and 2023, 261 patients were enrolled in the 360R encompassing 74 different clinical trials, of which, 156 patients (59.8%) were treated with molecularly matched targeted therapies and 105 (40.2%) treated with non-matched targeted therapies. The most frequent targets were FGFR signaling pathway (14.2%), epigenetic pathways (13.8%), Ras/Raf/MAPK pathway (12.3%), SHP2 (7.7%) and ErbB family pathway (6.5%). ORR increased over time: 6.4% (in 2015-2016), 14.3% (in 2017-2018), 18.2% (in 2019-2020) and 25.4% (in 2021-2023). PFS2/PFS1 ratio was ≥ 1.3 in 36.2% for all targeted therapies (40.6% in matched vs 29.4% in non-matched). The rate of grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse events remained stable. No treatment-related deaths were observed. Encouraging trends for improved efficacy were observed for targeted therapies in early phase clinical trials, especially for molecularly matched agents. These findings highlight the potential value of molecular prescreening programs matching patients to clinical trials assessing targeted therapies.