Eun Ju Choe

Eun Ju Choe

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

7Years (2020-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 January 2020 in Yonsei Medical Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
KPKyung Hee Park
Kyung Hee Park
DSDa Woon Sim
Da Woon Sim
SLSang Chul Lee
Sang Chul Lee
SMSunyoung Moon
Sunyoung Moon
ECEun Ju Choe
Eun Ju Choe
JPJung-Won Park
Jung-Won Park
Park KH, et al. Yonsei Med J. 2020 Aug;61(8):689-697. https://doi.org/10.3349/ymj.2020.61.8.689

20 August 2020 in Scientific Reports
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ECEun Ju Choe
Eun Ju Choe
JCJong Won Choi
Jong Won Choi
MKMinjin Kang
Minjin Kang
YLYong Kang Lee
Yong Kang Lee
HJHan Ho Jeon
Han Ho Jeon
JCJae Bock Chung
Jae Bock Chung
Very few population-based studies have examined the epidemiology of Wilson’s disease (WD). We investigated the epidemiology of WD using the National Health Insurance Service (NHIS) database in South Korea. We analyzed not only the statistical variables of WD, but also those of WD-related diseases. WD patients were identified with the relevant International Classification of Diseases-10 code out of 50.5 million people. We used the NHIS database from 2009 to 2016 and analyzed the incidence rate, prevalence, and clinical symptoms of WD. A total of 1,333 patients were identified. The average annual incidence rate was 3.8 per million person-years. The prevalence was 38.7 per million people. The mean diagnostic age was 26.1 ± 17.2 with earlier diagnosis in men (P = 0.0003). Among the patients, 988 (74.1%) had hepatic symptoms, 510 (38.3%) had neurologic symptoms, and 601 (45.1%) had psychiatric symptoms. Before the diagnosis of WD, 350 (26.3%) had neurologic symptoms, and 427 (32%) had psychiatric symptoms. The annual mortality rate was 0.7%. Age, liver cirrhosis, and liver failure correlated with a fatal prognosis (P < 0.05). Many patients showed neurologic and psychiatric symptoms before they were diagnosed with WD. Prognosis correlated with age, liver cirrhosis, and liver failure.

28 August 2023 in Pharmaceuticals
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
YLYong Kang Lee
Yong Kang Lee
HLHyun Sun Lim
Hyun Sun Lim
YCYoun I Choi
Youn I Choi
ECEun Ju Choe
Eun Ju Choe
SKSeonji Kim
Seonji Kim
SSSeung In Seo
Seung In Seo
Background/Aims: Conflicting results have been reported regarding the interaction between proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) and clopidogrel. We investigated whether concomitant PPI use influenced the risk of recurrence in patients with stroke and myocardial infarction (MI). Methods: This study used two databases for two different designs, the Korean National Health Insurance Service (NHIS) database for a self-controlled case series design, and the national sample cohort of the NHIS data base converted to the Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership-Common Data Model version for a cohort study based on large-scale propensity score matching. Results: In the PPI co-prescription group, recurrent hospitalization with stroke occurred in 17.6% of the 8201 patients with history of stroke, and recurrent MI occurred in 17.1% of the 1216 patients with history of MI within1 year. According to the self-controlled case series, the overall relative risk (RR) of recurrent stroke was 2.09 (95% confidence interval (CI); 1.83–2.38); the RR showed an increasing trend parallel to the time from the beginning of PPI co-prescription. In the cohort study, there was a higher incidence of recurrent stroke in the PPI co-prescription group (Hazard ratio (HR): 1.34, 95% CI: 1.01–1.76, p = 0.04). The overall RR of recurrent MI was 1.47 (95% CI; 1.02–2.11) in the self-controlled case series; however, there was no statistically significant difference in recurrent MI in the cohort study (HR:1.42, 95% CI:0.79–2.49, p = 0.23). The impact of individual PPIs on stroke and MI showed different patterns. Conclusions: A PPI co-prescription >4 weeks with clopidogrel was associated with hospitalization of recurrent stroke within 1 year of initial diagnosis; however, its association with recurrent MI remains inconclusive. The influence of individual PPIs should be clarified in the future.

10 March 2022 in The Korean Journal of Helicobacter and Upper Gastrointestinal Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ECEun Ju Choe
Eun Ju Choe
HJHan Ho Jeon
Han Ho Jeon
YCYong Suk Cho
Yong Suk Cho
SWSun Young Won
Sun Young Won
JSJeong Hun Seo
Jeong Hun Seo
YLYong Kang Lee
Yong Kang Lee
Background/Aims: This study aimed to compare the efficacy of a recently developed clear-cut knife with that of widely used knives for endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) in early gastric cancer (EGC).Materials and Methods: Data were collected retrospectively from the National Health Insurance Service Ilsan Hospital between May 2017 and April 2019. The study included 105 patients (108 lesions) with EGC who underwent ESD. Fifty-six EGCs were dissected using an insulation-tipped diathermic knife in combination with a needle knife, while 52 EGCs were dissected using a clear-cut knife, a single device with an integrated needle and an insulated-tipped knife. Oncologic outcomes and technical success were compared between the two groups.Results: The distribution of the tumor locations, composition of the undifferentiated types of EGCs, and the size of EGCs (14.3±8.0 vs. 16.6±7.3 mm; P=0.130) were not significantly different between the groups. The complete (98.2% vs. 94.2%; P=0.273) and curative (87.5% vs. 88.5%; P=0.878) resection rates were not statistically different. Furthermore, no significant difference between the total procedure times (39±34.1 vs. 35.7±20.1 minutes; P=0.554), areas of the dissected specimen (858.6±406.5 vs. 980.3±393.8 mm2; P=0.119) and dissected areas per minute (32.4±17.9 vs. 35.5±16.2 mm2/min; P=0.345) were noted. Regarding complications, the overall perforation rates (3.6% vs. 4.0%) and bleeding rates (3.6% vs. 8.0%) were not statistically different.Conclusions: The newly developed clear-cut knife is as useful as the combination of classical knives for ESD in EGC.

25 July 2023 in Preprints.org
Verified
Preprint
Open access
PDF file
YLYong Kang Lee
Yong Kang Lee
HLHyun Sun Lim
Hyun Sun Lim
YCYoun I Choi
Youn I Choi
ECEun Ju Choe
Eun Ju Choe
SKSeonji Kim
Seonji Kim
SSSeung In Seo
Seung In Seo
Background/Aims: Conflicting results have been reported regarding the interaction between proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) and clopidogrel. We investigated whether concomitant PPI use influenced the risk of recurrence in patients with stroke and myocardial infarction (MI). Methods: This study used two databases for different designs, the Korean National Health Insurance Service (NHIS) database for a self-controlled case series design, and the national sample cohort of the NHIS database converted to the Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership-Common Data Model version for a cohort study. Results: In the PPI co-prescription group, recurrent hospitalization with stroke occurred in 17.6% of the 8,201 patients with history of stroke, and recurrent MI occurred in 17.1% of the 1,216 patients with history of MI during 1 year. According to the self-controlled case series, the overall relative risk (RR) of recurrent stroke was 2.09 [95% confidence interval (CI); 1.83-2.38], and the RR showed an increasing trend with PPI duration. In the cohort study, there was a higher incidence of recurrent stroke in the PPI co-prescription group [Hazard ratio (HR): 1.34, 95% CI: 1.01-1.76, P=0.04]. The overall RR of recurrent MI was 1.47 (95% CI; 1.02-2.11) in the self-controlled case series; however, there was no statistically significant difference in recurrent MI in the cohort study (HR:1.42, 95% CI:0.79-2.49, P=0.23). The impact of individual PPIs on stroke and MI showed different patterns. Conclusions: PPI co-prescription with clopidogrel was associated with recurrent stroke; however, its association with recurrent MI remains inconclusive. The influence of individual PPIs should be clarified in the future.

1 December 2021 in Journal of Digestive Cancer Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ECEun Ju Choe
Eun Ju Choe
YLYong Kang Lee
Yong Kang Lee
HJHan Ho Jeon
Han Ho Jeon
JCJong Won Choi
Jong Won Choi
BPByung Kyu Park
Byung Kyu Park
YCYong Suk Cho
Yong Suk Cho
Eun Ju Choe, Yong Kang Lee, Han Ho Jeon, Jong Won Choi, Byung Kyu Park, Sun Young Won, Jeong Hun Seo, Chun Kyon Lee, Yong Suk Cho. Journal of Digestive Cancer Research 2021;9:43-9. https://doi.org/10.52927/jdcr.2021.9.2.43