Shouki Bazarbashi

Dr. Shouki Bazarbashi

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

32Years (1995-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 May 2015 in Annals of Saudi Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
NANasser Alsanea
Nasser Alsanea
AAAlaa S. Abduljabbar
Alaa S. Abduljabbar
SASamar Alhomoud
Samar Alhomoud
LALuai H. Ashari
Luai H. Ashari
DHDenise Hibbert
Denise Hibbert
SBShouki Bazarbashi
Shouki Bazarbashi
The national data on colorectal cancer in Saudi Arabia has not been analyzed. The objective of this study is to describe the demographics, incidence and survival rates for colorectal cancer in Saudi Arabia for the period 1994-2010. Retrospective analysis of the Saudi Cancer Registry data for the period 1994-2010. Data from the Saudi Cancer Registry was analyzed by stage at presentation (local, regional, distal, unknown) and survival rates were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. From 9889 colorectal cancer cases, a sample of 549 (5.6%) patients was selected and their living status ascertained to assess survival. Colorectal cancer has been the most common cancer among men and the third commonest among women since 2002 in Saudi Arabia. There has been a slight predominance among men with an average ratio of 116:100 over the years (range: 99:100-132:100). The overall age-standardized rate (ASR) approached a plateau of 9.6/100000 in 2010. The incidence of the disease has been highest in the capital, Riyadh, where it reached 14.5/100000 in 2010. Median age at presentation has been stable at around 60 years (95% confidence Interval (CI): 57-61 years) for men and 55 years (95% CI: 53-58 years) for women. Distant metastasis was diagnosed in 28.4% of patients at the time of presentation and rectal cancer represented 41% of all colorectal cancers diagnosed in 2010. The overall 5-year survival was 44.6% for the period 1994-2004. The ASR for all age groups below 45 years of age was lower than that for the United States. The study was retrospective with a possibility of bias from inaccurate staging of patients, and inaccurate survival information and patient demographics due to the underdeveloped census system prior to 2001. Survival data for the period 2005-2010 are lacking. Colorectal cancer presents at a younger age in Saudis, especially in women. This has a major implication for decisions about the threshold age for screening. The ASR has increased, but is still much lower than in developed countries. The lower overall 5-year survival compared with developed countries is due to lack of screening, a higher proportion of advanced stage cancer at presentation, lack of specialized care outside the major cities and a higher proportion of rectal cancer cases.

1 January 2013 in Hematology/Oncology and Stem Cell Therapy
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
FHFazal Hussain
Fazal Hussain
SISamra Iqbal
Samra Iqbal
AMAsif Mehmood
Asif Mehmood
SBShouki Bazarbashi
Shouki Bazarbashi
TETusneem ElHassan
Tusneem ElHassan
NCNaeem Chaudhri
Naeem Chaudhri
BACKGROUND: Thyroid cancer is the second most common malignancy among females at King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre (KFSH&RC) and in Saudi Arabia, accounting for about 11% of all newly diagnosed female cancers in the country in 2008. Over the past several decades, an increasing incidence of thyroid cancer has been reported in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. There are no comprehensive clinical epidemiological data for the trends of thyroid cancer incidence compared to the global incidence. This report reviews the thyroid cancer incidence in KFSH&RC and compares that with Saudi Arabia, the Gulf region, North America and globally from 2000 to 2010. METHODS: Retrospective review of patients with thyroid cancer was carried out from 2000 to 2010, using the hospital Tumor Registry program as per the American College of Surgeons standards. Trends and patterns of all well-known prognostic factors were sub-stratified by age, stage and grade. RESULTS: A total of 2292 patients with thyroid cancer were treated at KFSH&RC, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, from 2000 to 2010. Thyroid cancer constitutes about 9% of all malignancies and 12% of all female malignancies at KFSH&RC, which are significantly higher compared to the USA, where thyroid cancer represents only 2.9% of all malignancies and 4.6% of all female malignancies. Papillary adenocarcinoma was the most common histological subtype followed by papillary carcinoma, follicular variant. Median age at diagnosis was 40 for females and 44 years for males. Overall Age-Standardized Incidence Rate (ASR) was 4.4/100,000 (6.8 for female and 2/100,000 for males) in the Kingdom in 2008. Median age at diagnosis was 38 years and the highest incidence was in the 30–39 year age group in KFSH&RC. About 48% of patients presented in the localized stage and 60% underwent combined modality treatment consisting of surgery, radiation and hormonal therapy. There was significantly increased incidence among females as compared to males. The age-adjusted thyroid cancer incidence rates from 2000 to 2010 varied three-fold more for females than for males. Considerable geographical variations were present in thyroid cancer incidence in Saudi Arabia. CONCLUSION: Thyroid cancer incidence rates have increased exponentially between 2000 and 2010 and there is significant geographical variation in the incidence of thyroid cancer throughout the Kingdom. Thyroid cancer has become the second most common cancer among young Saudi women with a male to female ratio at 0.3:1. Rising incidence of thyroid cancer in Saudi Arabia may be due to the increased detection and diagnosis of the thyroid cancers and not only an increase in the true occurrence of thyroid cancer. More studies are required to determine this significant difference at the molecular level.

1 June 2010 in Clinical Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
AWA. El Weshi
A. El Weshi
AAA. Allam
A. Allam
DAD. Ajarim
D. Ajarim
FDF. Al Dayel
F. Al Dayel
RPR. Pant
R. Pant
MMM. Memon
M. Memon

4 June 2001 in Head & Neck
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
AEAdnan A. Ezzat
Adnan A. Ezzat
EIEzzeldin M. Ibrahim
Ezzeldin M. Ibrahim
AWAmr N. El Weshi
Amr N. El Weshi
YKYasser M. Khafaga
Yasser M. Khafaga
MAMahmoud AlJurf
Mahmoud AlJurf
Emanuele ZuccaEmanuele Zucca
Emanuele Zucca

1 September 2017
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SBShouki Bazarbashi
Shouki Bazarbashi
HAHaya Al-Eid
Haya Al-Eid
JMJoan Minguet
Joan Minguet
Background: In order to most appropriately allocate healthcare and research funding for cancer, it is important to have accurate population-based incidence data. The Saudi Cancer Registry (SCR) provides such information, covering the time period from 1994 to the present day. The current report concerns an overview of cancer incidence statistics for Saudi Arabia in 2012. Methods: The SCR collects data from healthcare facilities throughout the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. All newly diagnosed cases of cancer are recorded, with information on site and histology. For the present report, age-standardised and age-specific incidence rates (ASR, AIR, respectively) were calculated, with attention to gender-specific and regional differences. Results: The total number of incident cases of cancer identified by the SCR in 2012 was 14,336, with 6,791 (47.5%) among males and 7,545 (52.6%) among females. Of this total, 11,034 cases (76.9%) occurred in patients of Saudi origin. For Saudi males, the overall ASR (inc. all cancer sites) was 78.1 per 100,000 people, while that for females was 86.7. Incidence varied by region, with the Eastern region and Riyadh displaying the highest ASRs for both males and females, and Hail and Jazan displaying the lowest. Incidence varied by gender, with colorectal cancer (13.3%), non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL; 8.4%), and leukaemia (8.2%) being the most common types in males, and breast (25.8%), thyroid (11.7%), and colorectal cancers (9.3%) being the most common in females. Conclusions: This analysis of cancer incidence in Saudi Arabia demonstrated significant differences according to gender, age, and region of the Kingdom. The data should help ensure the most appropriate allocation of resources, with the aim of minimising the healthcare burden associated with cancer.

1 January 2007 in Leukemia & Lymphoma
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
AWAmr El Weshi
Amr El Weshi
SASaad Akhtar
Saad Akhtar
WMWalid A. Mourad
Walid A. Mourad
DADahish Ajarim
Dahish Ajarim
MAMahmoud Abdelsalm
Mahmoud Abdelsalm
IMIrfan Maghfoor
Irfan Maghfoor
T-cell/histiocyte-rich B-cell lymphoma (TC/HRBCL) is a rare subtype of diffuse large B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (DLBCL) with characteristic morphologic and immunophenotypic features, often misdiagnosed as Hodgkin's lymphoma and peripheral T-cell lymphoma. Few and conflicting clinical data are available in the literature addressing optimal treatment, prognosis and outcome. We retrospectively reviewed all patients diagnosed and managed at our institution between 1995 and 2004 diagnosed with T-cell-rich-B-cell lymphoma by WHO criteria. Sixty-one patients were identified. Initial pathology was incorrect in 82% of referred cases. The median age was 30 years. Seventy-one patients were males. Stage distribution was I – II in 21 patients, and III – IV in 40. Fifty-two percent of patients (32) had splenic involvement and thirty-seven patients (61%) presented with extranodal disease (22 ≥ 2 sites). The International Prognostic Index (IPI) score was ≥2 in 62% of patients. All 59 newly diagnosed TC/HRBCL patients were treated with CHOP or R-CHOP combination chemotherapy +/− radiation therapy. The overall response rate was 85% and nine patients progressed on therapy. Fourteen patients relapsed with a median time of relapse of 6 months (range, 2 – 28). At a median follow-up of 22 months (range 1 – 132); 32 patients (52%) are alive with no evidence of disease. The 5-year overall survival and event free survival rates were 46% and 39% respectively. To conclude, TC/HRBCL is difficult to recognize without immunohistochemistry. It has an aggressive course and poor outcome; with most of patients presenting with advanced disease stage together with high IPI score. Treatment outcome seems to be similar to IPI matched DLBCL counterpart.