Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) and its precursor lesions are detected at an early stage by CRC screening programmes, which reduce CRC‐related mortality. An important quality indicator for CRC screening is the occurrence of interval CRC (IC) between screening rounds. Currently there is no guideline regarding acceptable levels of ICs in CRC screening programmes, and ICs reported in prior work vary considerably.Methods: This study describes the occurrence of screen‐detected (SD) CRC and non–screen‐detected CRC within the population‐based CRC screening programme of Flanders, stratified by multiple variables such as sex, age, tumour location and tumour stage between October 2013 and July 2017. In addition, faecal immunochemical test (FIT) IC proportions over the sum of SD‐CRCs and FIT‐ICs are calculated, together with FIT sensitivity and programme sensitivity to display the effectiveness of detecting CRC by the screening programme.Results: Of 1,212,354 FIT participants, 4094 were diagnosed with SD‐CRC, whereas 772 participants were diagnosed with CRC between FIT‐screening rounds. Significant associations were shown between people not being SD for CRC and women, older individuals, right‐sided tumour location and more advanced tumour stage. Furthermore, a clear distinction was shown between the right‐sided and the left‐sided colorectum concerning all above‐mentioned variables and distributions of tumour stages.Conclusion: The Flemish FIT‐interval CRC proportion of 15.9% was within the limits of previously published results. In addition, calculations show that the effectiveness of the screening programme is dependent on tumour location, suggesting that future research should report results stratified by location.

Background: Crisis communication might not reach non-native speakers or persons with low literacy levels, a low socio-economic status, and/or an auditory or visual impairments as easily as it would reach other citizens. The aim of this rapid review was to synthesize the evidence on strategies used to improve inclusive pandemic-related crisis communication in terms of form, channel, and outreach. Methods: After a comprehensive search and a rigorous screening and quality assessment exercise, twelve comparative studies were selected for inclusion in this review. Data were analyzed and represented by means of a structured reporting of available effects using narrative tables. Results: The findings indicate that a higher message frequency (on any channel) may lead to a lower recall rate, audio–visual productions and tailored messages prove to be valuable under certain conditions, and primary healthcare practitioners appear to be the most trusted source of information for most groups of citizens. Trust levels were higher for citizens who were notified in advance of potential exceptions to the rule in the effect of preventive and curative measures promoted. Conclusions: This review contributes to combatting information inequality by providing evidence on how to remove the sensorial, linguistic, cultural, and textual barriers experienced by minorities and other underserved target audiences in COVID-19-related governmental crisis communication in response to the societal, health-related costs of ineffective communication outreach.

This review aimed to synthesize evidence on the effectiveness of shared decision-making (SDM) tools for cancer screening and explored the preferences of vulnerable people and clinicians regarding the specific characteristics of the SDM tools. A mixed-method convergent segregated approach was employed, which involved an independent synthesis of quantitative and qualitative data. Articles were systematically selected and screened, resulting in the inclusion and critical appraisal of 55 studies. Results from the meta-analysis revealed that SDM tools were more effective for improving knowledge, reducing decisional conflict, and increasing screening intentions among vulnerable populations compared to non-vulnerable populations. Subgroup analyses showed minimal heterogeneity for decisional conflict outcomes measured over a six-month period. Insights from the qualitative findings revealed the complexities of clinicians’ and vulnerable populations’ preferences for an SDM tool in cancer screening. Vulnerable populations highly preferred SDM tools with relevant information, culturally tailored content, and appropriate communication strategies. Clinicians, on the other hand, highly preferred tools that can be easily integrated into their medical systems for efficient use and can effectively guide their practice for cancer screening while considering patients’ values. Considering the complexities of patients’ and clinicians’ preferences in SDM tool characteristics, fostering collaboration between patients and clinicians during the creation of an SDM tool for cancer screening is essential. This collaboration may ensure effective communication about the specific tool characteristics that best support the needs and preferences of both parties.

Objective: In Flanders (Belgium), a population-based colorectal cancer (CRC) screening programme was started in 2013, coordinated by the Centre for Cancer Detection (CCD) in cooperation with the Belgian Cancer Registry (BCR). The CCD offers a biennial faecal immunochemical test (FIT) to Flemish citizens aged 56–74 years and recommends a colonoscopy when screened positive by FIT. The study objective is to investigate sociodemographic differences in follow-up colonoscopy adherence after a positive FIT. Methods: Characteristics of the study population were derived by linkage of data from the CCD and BCR, linked with data of the Intermutualistic Agency and the Crossroads Bank for Social Security, resulting in aggregated tables to ensure anonymity. A total of 37 834 men and women aged 56–74 years with a positive FIT in 2013–2014 were included. Adherence to follow-up colonoscopy was calculated for age, sex, work intensity at household level, preferential reimbursement status, and first and current nationality. Descriptive analyses and logistic regressions were performed. Results: Nonadherence to follow-up colonoscopy was associated with increasing age, and was significantly higher in men [odds ratio (OR), 1.08], participants with a preferential reimbursement status (OR, 1.34), very low work intensity (OR, 1.41), no payed work (OR, 1.38) and other than Belgian nationality by birth (OR, 1.6–4.66). Conclusion: Adherence to follow-up colonoscopy after a positive FIT differs according to sociodemographic variables. Additional research is needed to explore reasons for nonadherence to colonoscopy and tackle barriers by exploring interventions to increase colonoscopy follow-up adherence after a positive FIT in the Flemish colorectal cancer screening programme.

Background: To investigate colorectal cancer (CRC) screening rates by the faecal immunochemical test (FIT) according to sociodemographic characteristics and nationality. Methods: Men and women, aged 56–74, invited to participate in the Flemish CRC screening programme in 2013 and 2014 were included in this study. We analysed the association between CRC screening uptake and sex, age, (first and current) nationality and several proxies for socio-economic status (SES). The statistical analysis was based on descriptive analyses and logistic regression models. Results: A total of 1 184 426 persons were included in our analysis. The overall screening uptake was 52.3%, uptake varied by sex, age, nationality and SES. Lower participation rates were associated with the youngest and oldest age categories (56–60 and 70–74) and being male. All nationalities other than Belgian or Dutch were significantly less screened. Lower uptake of screening was also associated with several proxy’s for low SES, such as having an allowance for being disabled, not being able to work, being an extended minor and having a social allowance/minimum wage. The descriptive analysis showed a 27% difference in CRC screening uptake between the (early) retired and the people entitled to a minimum wage. Conclusions: There is a significant difference between screening uptake and demographic and socio-economic variables in the first 2 years of the population-based screening programme in Flanders. Based on the study results, implementing strategies to improve participation in those subgroups is needed.