The effective management of surface water bodies, such as rivers, lakes, and reservoirs, necessitates a comprehensive understanding of water quality status. Altered precipitation patterns due to climate change may significantly affect the water quality and influence treatment procedures. This study aims to identify the most suitable water quality prediction models for the assessment of the water quality status for three water supply reservoirs in Toowoomba, Australia. It employed four machine learning and two deep learning models for determining the Water Quality Index (WQI) based on five parameters sensitive to rainfall impact. Temporal WQI variations over a period of 22 years (2000–2022) are scrutinised across 4 seasons and 12 months. Through regression analysis, both machine learning and deep learning models anticipate WQI gauged by seven accuracy metrics. Notably, XGBoost and GRU yielded exceptional outcomes, showcasing an R² value of 0.99. Conversely, Bidirectional LSTM (BiLSTM) demonstrated moderate accuracy with results hovering at 88% to 90% for water quality prediction across all reservoirs. The Coefficient of Efficiency (CE) and Willmott Index (d) showed that the models capture patterns well, while MAE, MAPE and RMSE provided good performance metrics for the RFR, XGBoost and GRU models. These models have provided valuable knowledge that can be utilised to assess the adverse consequences of extreme climate events such as shifts in rainfall patterns. These insights can be used to improve strategies for managing water bodies more effectively.

Planning, managing and optimising surface water quality is a complex and multifaceted process, influenced by the effects of both climate uncertainties and anthropogenic activities. Developing an innovative and robust decision support framework (DSF) is essential for effective and efficient water quality management, so it can provide essential information on water quality and assist policy makers and water resource managers to identify potential causes of water quality deterioration. This framework is crucial for implementing actions such as infrastructure development, legislative compliance and environmental initiatives. Recent advancements in computational domains have created opportunities for employing artificial intelligence (AI), advanced statistics and mathematical methods for use in improved water quality management. This study proposed a comprehensive conceptual DSF to minimise the adverse effects of extreme weather events and climate change on water quality. The framework utilises machine learning (ML), deep learning (DL), geographical information system (GIS) and advanced statistical and mathematical techniques for water quality management. The foundation of this framework is the outcomes from our three studies, where we examined the application of ML and DL models for predicting water quality index (WQI) in reservoirs, utilising statistical and mathematical methods to find the seasonal trend of rainfall and water quality, exploring the potential connection between streamflow, rainfall and water quality, and employing GIS to show the spatial and temporal variability of hydrological parameters and WQI. Three potable water supply reservoirs in the Toowoomba region of Australia were taken as the study area for practical implementation of the proposed DSF. This framework can serve as a comprehensive mechanism to identify distinct seasonal characteristics and understand correlations between rainfall, streamflow and water quality. This will enable policy makers and water resource managers to enhance their decision making processes by selecting the management priorities to safeguard water quality in the face of future climate variability, including prolonged droughts and flooding.

Changes in water quality are closely linked to seasonal fluctuations in streamflow, and a thorough understanding of how these variations interact across different time scales is important for the efficient management of surface water bodies such as rivers, lakes, and reservoirs. The aim of this study is to explore the potential connection between streamflow, rainfall, and water quality and propose an optimised ensemble model for the prediction of a water quality index (WQI). This study modelled the changes in five water quality parameters such as ammonia nitrogen (NH₃-N), phosphate (PO₄³⁻), pH, turbidity, total dissolved solids (TDS), and their associated WQI caused by rainfall and streamflow. The analysis was conducted across three temporal scales, weekly, monthly, and seasonal, using a generalised additive model (GAM) in Toowoomba, Australia. TDS, turbidity, and WQI exhibited a significant nonlinear variation with the changes in streamflow in the weekly and monthly scales. Additionally, pH demonstrated a significant linear to weakly linear correlation with discharge across the three temporal scales. For the accurate prediction of WQI, this study proposed an ensemble model integrating an extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) and Bayesian optimisation (BO) algorithm, using streamflow as an input across the same temporal scales. The results for the three temporal scales provided the best accuracy of monthly data, based on the accuracy metrics R² (0.91), MAE (0.20), and RMSE (0.42). The comparison between the test and predicted data indicated that the prediction model overestimated the WQI at some points. This study highlights the efficiency of integrating rainfall, streamflow, and water quality correlations for WQI prediction, which can provide valuable insights for guiding future water management strategies in similar catchment areas, especially amidst changing climatic conditions.

An understanding of the trend and relationship between rainfall patterns and water quality dynamics can provide valuable guidelines for the effective management of water resources. The aim of this study was to reveal the synchronous trends in rainfall and water quality and to explore the potential connection between seasonal variation in rainfall volume and the water quality index. This study scrutinised the seasonal temporal trends of rainfall and water quality parameters of three water supply reservoirs in the Toowoomba region of Australia by applying the modified Mann–Kendall (MMK) test and innovative trend analysis (ITA) methods from data collected over 22 years (2002–2022). The models showed a significant increasing trend of rainfall in two rainfall stations during autumn season. The water quality parameters, such as PO₄³⁻, exhibited a significant decreasing trend in all seasons in three reservoirs. On the other hand, the water quality index (WQI) showed a decreasing trend in the Cooby and Cressbrook reservoirs, excepting the Perseverance reservoir, which exhibited an increasing trend. In addition to the detection of trends, this study investigated the potential correlation between seasonal variation of rainfall volume and the water quality index using the wavelet transform coherence (WTC) method. The data of twelve rainfall stations were brought into this analysis. The WTC analysis displayed an apparent correlation between the water quality index and rainfall pattern for 70% of the rainfall stations across 8–16 periods. The highest coherency was noticed in 8–16 periods from 2002–2022, as observed at both the Cooby Creek rainfall station and in the WQI of the Cooby reservoir. This evaluation revealed the intertwined dynamics of rainfall patterns and water quality, providing a deeper understanding of their interdependence and implications, which might be useful for environmental and hydrological management practices.

Availability of hydrological data and various soft wares for developing models make easy way to answer frequently asked questions to hydrologists. A great deal of concentration has given to the development of models in the last decades. But the thorough study regarding uncertainty of simulations has not carried out in comparison with the development of models. Uncertainty in models emanates from input data, calibrated data, parameters and from the structure of models. The sources of uncertainty, cause of generation and how these can be dealt with are reviewed here. This also comprises a review about five different methods viz. Monte Carlo sampling, Bayesian approach, Generalized Likelihood Uncertainty Estimation, Bootstrap Approach and Machine learning methods which were applied in the estimation of the model and parameter uncertainty. This will indicate the comparison between the methods which were applied to measure the uncertainty of hydrological models and highlight the strengths and weaknesses of the methods in identifying the usefulness of the models. By the comparison of the methods the improvement of the model reliability, slackening of the prediction error of the hydrological models can be suggested. By a proper quantification of uncertainty of data applied for the building up and evaluation of models, model performance can be improved, cost can be reduced and unambiguous results can lead the proper water resources management.