The application of antimicrobial surfaces requires the proof of their effectivity by in vitro methods in laboratories. One of the most well-known test methods is ISO 22196:2011, which represents a simple and inexpensive protocol by applying the bacterial suspension with known volume and concentration covered under a polyethylene film on the surfaces. The incubation is then done under defined humidity conditions for 24 h. Another approach for testing of non-porous surfaces is the newly published ISO 7581:2023. A “dry test” is achieved through spreading and drying 1 μL of a bacterial suspension on the surface. In this study, low alloyed carbon steel, polyethylene terephthalate (PET), and glass specimens were tested uncoated (reference) and coated with zinc according to both ISOs to compare and to evaluate the advantages and disadvantages of each one of them. Although ISO 7581:2023 allows a more realistic test environment than ISO 22196:2011, the reproducibility of the results is not given due to the low application volume. In addition, not all bacterial strains are equally suitable for this testing type. Individual adaptations to the protocols, including incubation conditions (time, temperature, or relative humidity), testing strains and volume, seem necessary to generate conditions that simulate the final application. Nevertheless, both ISOs, if used correctly, provide a good basis for estimating the antimicrobial efficacy of non-porous surfaces.

Understanding interactions of bacteria with fiber-based packaging materials is fundamental for appropriate food packaging. We propose a laboratory model to evaluate microbial growth and survival in liquid media solely consisting of packaging materials with different fiber types. We evaluated food contaminating species (Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus, Bacillus cereus), two packaging material isolates and bacterial endospores for their growth abilities. Growth capacities differed substantially between the samples as well as between bacterial strains. Growth and survival were strongest for the packaging material entirely made of recycled fibers (secondary food packaging) with up to 10.8 log₁₀ CFU/ml for the packaging isolates. Among the food contaminating species, B. cereus and E. coli could grow in the sample of entirely recycled fibers with maxima of 6.1 log₁₀ and 8.6 log₁₀ CFU/mL, respectively. Escherichia coli was the only species that was able to grow in bleached fresh fibers up to 7.0 log₁₀ CFU/mL. Staphylococcus aureus perished in all samples and was undetectable after 1–6 days after inoculation, depending on the sample. The packaging material strains were isolated from recycled fibers and could grow only in samples containing recycled fibers, indicating an adaption to this environment. Spores germinated only in the completely recycled sample. Additionally, microbial digestion of cellulose and xylan might not be a crucial factor for growth. This is the first study describing bacterial growth in food packaging materials itself and proposing functionalization strategies toward active food packaging through pH-lowering.

One of the greatest challenges worldwide is containing the spread of problematic microorganisms. A promising approach is the use of antimicrobial coatings (AMCs). The antimicrobial potential of certain metals, including copper and zinc, has already been verified. In this study, polyethylene terephthalate and aluminum (PET-Al) foils were coated with copper, zinc, and a combination of these two metals, known as core–shell particles, respectively. The resistance of the three different types of coatings to mechanical and chemical exposure was evaluated in various ways. Further, the bacteria Staphylococcus aureus and the bacteriophage ϕ6 were used to assess the antimicrobial efficacy of the coatings. The best efficacy was achieved with the pure copper coating, which was not convincing in the abrasion tests. The result was a considerable loss of copper particles on the surfaces and reduced effectiveness against the microorganisms. The core–shell particles demonstrated better adhesion to the surfaces after abrasion tests and against most chemical agents. In addition, the antimicrobial efficiency remained more stable after the washability treatment. Thus, the core–shell particles had several benefits over the pure copper and zinc coatings. In addition, the best core–shell loading for durability and efficacy was determined in this study.

Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, researchers have focused on new preventive measures to limit the spread of SARS-CoV-2. One promising application is the usage of antimicrobial materials on often-touched surfaces to reduce the load of infectious virus particles. Since tests with in vitro-propagated SARS-CoV-2 require biosafety level 3 (BSL-3) laboratories with limited capacities and high costs, experiments with an appropriate surrogate like the bacteriophage ɸ6 are preferred in most studies. The aim of this study was to compare ɸ6 and SARS-CoV-2 within antiviral surface tests. Different concentrations of copper coatings on polyethylene terephthalate (PET) were used to determine their neutralizing activity against ɸ6 and SARS-CoV-2. The incubation on the different specimens led to similar inactivation of both SARS-CoV-2 and ɸ6. After 24 h, no infectious virus particles were evident on any of the tested samples. Shorter incubation periods on specimens with high copper concentrations also showed a complete inactivation. In contrast, the uncoated PET foils resulted only in a negligible reduced inactivation during the one-hour incubation. The similar reduction rate for ɸ6 and SARS-CoV-2 in our experiments provide further evidence that the bacteriophage ɸ6 is an adequate model organism for SARS-CoV-2 for this type of testing.

The application of antimicrobial surfaces requires proof of their effectivity by in vitro methods in laboratories. One of the most common test methods is ISO 22196:2011, which represents a simple and inexpensive protocol by applying the bacterial suspension with known volume and concentration covered under a polyethylene film on the surfaces. The incubation is then conducted under defined humidity conditions for 24 h. Another approach for testing non-porous surfaces is the newly published ISO 7581:2023. With this protocol, a “dry test” is achieved by spreading and drying 1 μL of a bacterial suspension on the surfaces. A comprehensive evaluation of both standard protocols was conducted. This showed that they have some limitations and often do not include realistic test conditions that refer to the final product. Accordingly, the objective of this study was to develop a novel testing procedure that uses the spraying of a suspension inside of a chamber to generate aerosols with a precisely defined bacterial or yeast load. The samples to be analyzed are covered with small droplets that dry up within a few minutes and thus enable very reproducible contamination of the surfaces. The test series was carried out with low-alloyed carbon steel and glass without antimicrobial substances against two different Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus epidermidis strains and one Candida albicans strain to evaluate the new method. The results provided reproducible and reliable results in the setup carried out. This test method represents a valuable alternative for the assessment of non-porous surfaces in a manner that more closely reflects real-world conditions (e.g., simulation of aerosol formation by sneezing).