Background: Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is associated with poor outcomes and limited treatment options, leading to increased use of targeted therapies for its management. Here, we performed one of the largest single-centre reviews evaluating outcomes following personalised targeted agents in CCA patients. Methods: All consecutive CCA patients receiving systemic therapy between January 2010 and April 2023 at UCLH were included. The primary objective of this study was to evaluate treatment response, survival outcomes and predictors of clinical benefit in CCA patients treated with molecularly guided therapies. Patient demographic factors, disease characteristics and survival outcomes were evaluated using the Kaplan–Meier method and Cox proportional-hazards models. Results: Of the 227 consecutive CCA patients, 162 (71%) had molecular profiling, of whom 56 (35%) were eligible and 55 received molecular-targeted treatment. CCA histological classifications comprised intrahepatic (N = 32), extrahepatic (N = 11), hilar (N = 4) and unknown (N = 9) subtypes. Most patients received targeted agents based on genomic profiling in a second treatment line setting (N = 34). Frequently observed genomic alterations occurred in the FGFR2 (N = 21), IDH1 (N = 7) and BRCA2 (N = 6) genes. Median progression-free survival (PFS) following first-, second- and third-line systemic therapy and overall survival (OS) were 8.44 (95% CI, 7.49–12.78), 5.65 (95% CI, 3.71–7.13), 5.55 (2.79–12.58) and 29.01 (24.21–42.91) months, respectively. CCA subtype and FGFR/BRCA molecular aberration status were not associated with PFS or OS. However, a prior CCA-related surgical history was predictive of OS (p = 0.02). Stratification by best overall response to second-line targeted agents demonstrated an association with PFS (p = 0.002) and OS (p = 0.02). Duration of treatment with second-line targeted therapy was associated with OS (p < 0.001). Conclusions: Patients receiving targeted therapeutics achieved promising outcomes, especially those attaining a favourable treatment response and those receiving targeted agents for longer periods. Liquid biopsies can reliably provide information on extended molecular profiling to aid patient selection for personalised therapies.

Purpose: Evaluation of predictors and outcomes in NSCLC patients treated with an immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) following a severe immune-related adverse event (irAE). Methods: We included all NSCLC patients receiving ≥1 ICI cycle and corticosteroids for CTCAE Grade ≥3 irAEs between 2017 and 2023 from three UK NHS teaching hospitals. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) after the 1st irAE, best overall response (BOR) to ICI, and predictors of clinical benefit were evaluated. Kaplan–Meier, Cox and logistic regression models, and Wilcoxon tests were used. Results: We screened 1658 NSCLC patients and identified 80 eligible subjects. The majority of patients had metastatic (n = 50, 63%) vs. localized (n = 30, 37%) NSCLC. Most patients developed a single ≥Grade 3 irAE on 1st line ICI (n = 71, 89%). Overall, 14 (18%) patients developed 2nd irAEs, 7 after rechallenge with ICIs. In the complete cohort, median OS after 1st irAE was 15.84 months (95% CI, 12.45–26.91). Lower neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), patients receiving >4 cycles of ICI or median duration of ICI of >2.76 months before 1st irAE were associated with improved OS (p < 0.05), the latter two with PFS (p < 0.05). Age, gender, stage, KRAS mutation, PD-L1 and ICI type were not associated with PFS or OS. Pneumonitis as 1st irAE had the worst PFS and OS (p < 0.05). Median starting corticosteroid dose of ≤60 mg for 1st irAE had an improved OS (p = 0.04). Post 1st irAE response associated with better PFS and OS (p < 0.05). Number and duration of irAEs and additional immunosuppressive agents (14% of patients) were not associated with PFS or OS. Conclusions: In ≥Grade 3 irAEs patients managed with corticosteroids, lower baseline NLR, longer ICI use, response to ICI after 1st irAE, and a ≤60 mg corticosteroid dose had promising outcomes.

Purpose: We conducted the largest multinational review to date evaluating outcomes following radiotherapy for non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) patients with oligoprogressive disease (OPD) on immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Methods: Patients with NSCLC irradiated to ≤5 progressive lesions while receiving ICIs between 2010 and 2023 were identified. We evaluated predictors of local control (LC), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Patient demographics, disease characteristics, and survival were analyzed using the Wilcoxon test, Kaplan-Meier methods, and uni-/multivariate Cox models. Results: Out of 1178 treated patients, 103 eligible ones were included. The median OPD lesion was 1; the most common site was the lung (n = 33). The median LC of irradiated OPD lesions was not reached. Median PFS and OS were 6.90 (5.75–12.91) and 23.46 (17.54–37.16) months, respectively. Patient demographics, tumor pathological factors, number of OPD lesions, cumulative tumor volume, radiation modality, and OPD response to prior ICIs before radiation were not associated with these three outcomes. However, LC was associated with intermediate/high radiation doses (p = 0.005) and local response to radiation (p = 0.007). Improved PFS was associated with visceral OPD sites following radiation (p = 0.01). A favorable OS was associated with intermediate/high radiation doses (p = 0.01), local response to radiation (p = 0.006), and duration of last ICI before OPD (p = 0.03). Conclusions: Promising outcomes were observed with ICI and radiation for visceral OPD at intermediate/high doses. Prolonged ICI use before OPD and local response to radiotherapy improved survival. These data can contribute towards guidance of multidisciplinary clinical decision-making for managing OPD in NSCLC patients receiving ICIs.

Advancing precision oncology for esophagogastric cancer in the era of antibody-drug conjugates

Background: We reviewed outcomes of short and long-term chemotherapy with or without breaks in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) patients. Methods: PDAC patients receiving ≥3 chemotherapy cycles between 2019 and 2024 at three institutions were included. Progression-free survival after first-line chemotherapy (PFS1), overall survival (OS) and best overall response (BOR) to chemotherapy were assessed using the Wilcoxon test, Kaplan–Meier test, and univariate and multivariate Cox regression models. Results: We screened 237 patients, and 135 patients met the study criteria. Among these patients, 25 had resectable disease, and 110 had unresectable/metastatic disease (13% borderline resectable (BRPC), 20% locally advanced (LAPC), 10% localised developing metastases, 57% de novo metastatic). Ten patients (7%) underwent genetic profiling; KRAS aberrations (N = 4), actionable PLAB2/BRCA2/FGFR2 mutations (N = 3), ATM/BRIP1 alteration (N = 1). Two patients were managed with PARP inhibitors after receiving multiple lines of chemotherapy. Median PFS1 and OS were concordant with the published literature, but select patient groups achieved prolonged survival outcomes. Among the 36 BRPC/LAPC patients, we observed >1-year PFS1 in 9 (25%) patients and >2-year OS in 3 (8%) patients. Among the 63 de novo metastatic patients, we observed >1-year PFS1 and >2-year OS in 6 (10%) patients. Among patients with localised disease, smoking history was a poor prognostic factor with respect to OS (p = 0.03). Improved PFS1 and OS was associated with ≥6 cycles of first-line chemotherapy, its duration of ≥3.66 months, and local treatment after first chemotherapy (p < 0.05 for all). Stereotactic body radiotherapy following first-line chemotherapy was delivered in N = 6 (27%) and N = 1 (7%) of patients with LAPC and BRPC, respectively. Chemotherapy interruption duration, but not number, was associated with PFS1 and OS only in the localised cohort (p < 0.05). In patients with de novo metastatic disease, prevalence of type 2 diabetes was adversely associated with OS (p = 0.03). Improved PFS and OS was associated with ≥6 cycles of first-line chemotherapy, its duration of ≥4.37 months, and BOR to it (only in this cohort) (p < 0.05 for all). A favourable OS was associated with >1 line of chemotherapy (p = 0.003). Conclusion: Despite challenges, extended chemotherapy and multiple treatment lines may improve survival, with localised treatments benefiting select patients.