Zusammenfassung: Hintergrund: Die chirurgische Facharztweiterbildung erfordert neben dem Erlernen theoretischen Wissens ebenfalls den Erwerb praktisch-chirurgischer Kompetenzen. Eine Alternative zur Aus- und Weiterbildung am Patienten stellen simulationsbasierte Lehrkonzepte dar. Ziel der vorliegenden Studie ist die Analyse der Verteilung und des Einsatzes chirurgischer Simulatoren in deutschen Kliniken. Methoden: Die Datenanalyse erfolgte auf Basis eines individuellen Onlinefragebogens mit insgesamt 19 standardisierten Fragen. Dieser wurde über die E‑Mail-Verteiler der deutschen chirurgischen Fachgesellschaften an die leitenden chirurgischen Klinikärzte versendet. Ergebnisse: Insgesamt 267 vollständige Antwortdatensätze wurden analysiert (Rücklaufquote 12,0 %). 84,0 % der Teilnehmer gaben ihre Tätigkeit an einem Lehrkrankenhaus an. Zum Zeitpunkt der Untersuchung waren 143 chirurgische Simulatoren an 35,0 % der in die Auswertung eingeschlossenen Kliniken vorhanden. Regional zeigten sich deutliche Unterschiede zwischen den einzelnen Bundesländern. 21,1 % der Teilnehmer, an deren Klinik kein Simulator zur Verfügung steht, planten eine Neubeschaffung. Studierende (41,1 %) und Ärzte in Weiterbildung (ÄiW, 32,5 %) nutzten das Simulationstraining am häufigsten. Eine Integration in die chirurgische Weiterbildung bestand zu 81,8 % nicht. 94,0 % der beteiligten Kliniken zeigten Interesse an einer zukünftigen Integration in die chirurgische Facharztweiterbildung. Schlussfolgerung: Die vorliegenden Ergebnisse bestätigen die besondere Bedeutung des simulationsbasierten Trainings für die chirurgische Weiterbildung an deutschen Kliniken. Gleichzeitig bestehen deutliche Informationsdefizite über das Nutzungsverhalten sowie eine defizitär empfundene Integration des Simulationstrainings in die chirurgische Weiterbildung.

Background: The ergonomic advantages and potential challenges that robotic surgery poses to the well-being of surgeons are mainly unexplored. The most recent surgical robot introduced on the European market is the Hugo™ RAS System by Medtronic. This study aims to evaluate the ergonomic benefits of the Hugo™ RAS System, which is available in our training laboratory, CeMIT (Center for Medical Innovation and Technology Cologne). Methods and procedures: Using the previously established Cologne Ergonomic Measurement Setup for Robotic Surgery (CEMRobSurg), we measured three parameters related to ergonomic posture from subjects with different levels of surgical expertise (laypeople, medical students, surgical residents, and expert robotic surgeons). The heart rate was measured continuously using a polar band. The noise level was measured while using the Hugo™ RAS System, and automated photographs using our locally developed methodology were captured of the participant every 2 s to assess body posture. The ergonomic measurements were conducted while the subject performed the same standardized robotic training exercises (Peg Board, Rope Walk, and Ring Walk). Results: A total of 53 participants were enrolled in this study. The average noise level during all measurements was 54.87 dB. The highest stress level was measured in surgical residents with a sympathetic nervous system index (SNS index) of 1.15 (min − 1.43, max 3.56). The lowest stress level was measured in robotic experts with an SNS index of 0.23 (min − 0.18, max 0.91). We observed a risk-prone positioning of the neck and elbow in medical students (mean 39.6° and 129.48°, respectively). Robotic experts showed a risk positioning in the knee and hip region (mean 107.89° and 90.31°, respectively). Conclusion: This is the first study to analyze and objectify the ergonomic posture of medical students, surgical trainees, surgeons, and laypeople using the open console, modular Hugo™ RAS System. Our findings offer recommendations for operating surgeons and allow for a comparative analysis between the different robotic systems. Further evaluations in real-time operative scenarios will follow.

Background: Postesophagectomy diaphragmatic prolapse (PDP) is a major complication after esophagectomy with significant mortality and morbidity. However, in the current literature, treatment and outcomes are not evaluated for patients undergoing an Ivor Lewis Robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (IL-RAMIE). The aim of this study is to evaluate the incidence of PDP after IL-RAMIE. Moreover, the study aims to determine whether using a minimally invasive approach in the management of PDP after an IL-RAMIE procedure is safe and feasible. Materials and Methods: This study includes all patients who received an IL-RAMIE at our high-volume center (>200 esophagectomies/year) between April 2017 and December 2022 and developed PDP. The analysis focuses on time to prolapse, symptoms, treatment, surgical method, and recurrence rates of these patients. Results: A total of 185 patients underwent an IL-RAMIE at our hospital. Eleven patients (5.9%) developed PDP. Patients presented with PDP after a medium time of 241 days with symptoms like reflux, nausea, vomiting, and pain. One-third of these patients did not suffer from any symptoms. In all cases, a CT scan was performed in which the colon transversum always presented as the herniated organ. In one patient, prolapse of the small intestine, pancreas, and greater omentum also occurred. A total of 91% of these patients received a revisional surgery in a minimally invasive manner with a mean hospital stay of 12 days. In four patients, PDP recurred (36%) after 13, 114, 119 and 237 days, respectively. Conclusion: This study shows that a minimally invasive approach in repositioning PDP is a safe and effective option after IL-RAMIE.