Objective: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the relationship between soft tissues aesthetics and incisor torque, as well as the effect of crowding, anchorage, and extraction pattern, in adult patients treated without extraction or with two or four extractions. Materials and methods: Seventy-seven subjects with permanent dentition were selected retrospectively. Among these, 24 patients were treated with four extractions, 24 with two extractions and 29 without extractions. Lateral cephalograms and photographies taken before (T0) and after (T1) treatment were retrieved. The amount of crowding and the type of anchorage were recorded, and a cephalometric analysis was performed. A one-way ANOVA was used to compare the variables within and between groups. Linear regressions were performed to evaluate the effect of different predictors on soft tissues variables at T1. Results: The statistical analysis showed no differences within and between groups for soft tissue aesthetics. A significant reduction of the angle obtained from the intersection of Frankfurt plane and mandibular plane was observed in the four-extractions group, and a significant proclination of the lower incisors was observed in the two-extraction group. Linear regressions revealed that the change in soft tissue profile aesthetics was affected by the type of anchorage and the two-extractions pattern. Conclusions: Similar soft tissue aesthetics were observed after treatment in the three groups, despite the presence of some skeletal and dental differences. Clinical relevance: A well-controlled incisor torque helps to preserve soft tissues aesthetics. The type of anchorage could influence soft tissues.

(1) Background: The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of the Rapid Maxillary Expander (RME) II System compared to a Herbst appliance and a control group in the treatment of class II skeletal malocclusions in growing patients. (2) Methods: A total of 30 class II patients treated using the RME II System (group R) were compared with 30 patients treated with a Herbst appliance (group H) and 30 untreated class II children (group C). Cephalograms were compared at the start (T0) and after 24 months (T1). Nine cephalometric parameters were analyzed: SN-MP, SN-PO, ANB, AR-GO-ME, AR-GO-N, N-GO-ME, SN-PP, LFH, CO-GN, 1+SN, IMPA, OVERJET, and OVERBITE. Since the variables failed the normality test, a Wilcoxon test was performed for a pairwise comparison of the cephalometric measurements taken at T0 (pre-treatment) and at T1 (post-treatment). ANOVA with Tukey post hoc correction was used to evaluate the differences among the groups. (3) Results: ANOVA showed a statistically significant difference for all analyzed variables except for AR-GO-ME, AR-GO-N, and N-GO-ME. Post hoc Tukey’s HSD test showed the following difference: the SN-PO angle in group H was 3.59° greater than in group R; the LFH in group H was 4.13 mm greater than in group R. The mandibular length (CO-GN) in group H was 3.94 mm greater than in group R; IMPA in group H was 6.4° greater than in group R; and the ANB angle in group H was 1.47° greater than in group R. (4) Conclusions: The RME II System is an effective therapeutic device for class II skeletal malocclusion treatment in growing patients.

Nail biting (NB) is a repetitive and uncontrolled parafunctional activity that can affect oral health by altering tooth shape and intraoral position. Nowadays, there is not enough scientific evidence about the impact of NB on teeth; therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the effects of NB on the length, width and inclination of upper central incisors. This retrospective study involved 76 patients, 40 males and 36 females, with a mean age of 10.6 ± 0.3 years. Digital scans of the maxillary arch of each patient were recorded. Next, the length, width and inclination of upper central incisors used and not used for NB were measured. Finally, data were analysed with a paired t-test. Statistical analysis showed statistically significant differences in the length and inclination of upper central incisors used for NB compared with those of upper central incisors not used for NB, while the width did not show a significant difference. There were relevant changes in upper central incisors subjected to NB, demonstrating that NB impairs the shape, morphology and inclination of teeth. Therefore, because of the potentially negative consequences of NB, it is recommended that NB not be underestimated.

This case report describes an 18-year-old female patient with a skeletal class I pattern, mandibular asymmetry, a molar class III on the right side, a molar class II on the left side, and an anterior open bite (AOB). Treatment of AOB is often difficult for orthodontists and a multidisciplinary approach is sometimes required to rehabilitate the correct function and posture of the tongue. In this case the AOB was treated using the Nuvola^® OP System: a treatment system that combines orthodontic aligners and a myofunctional elastodontic device called Freedom. An upper molar intrusion with miniscrews was performed during the first phase of the treatment programme, and then the aligner treatment began. The Nuvola^® OP System ’s aligners are characterized by lingual pins that guide the tongue to the palatal spot position and take advantage of tongue function. The patient was instructed to wear the Freedom device for 30 min a day and to clench every 3 s with closed lips while wearing the aligners. These exercises improve the fitting of the aligners, improve the tongue’s posture, and take advantage of the masticatory forces to resolve the malocclusion. The patient was successfully treated, thus demonstrating that the Nuvola^® OP System is a valid alternative for the treatment of AOB.

Objective: The study aimed to assess occlusal force in patients with posterior crossbite using a dynamometer. Additionally, the discrepancies in force between the crossbite side and the opposite side of the arches were evaluated. Methods: The occlusal force of 52 patients with posterior crossbite was measured and compared with that of 52 patients with normal occlusion. The Wilcoxon signed‐rank test was performed to compare the force of each side. Because the data had a non‐normal distribution, to compare the total occlusal force of the two groups, the Mann–Whitney test was performed. Finally, to compare the force between the two sides, using a symmetry index determined by the difference in force between the sides, the Mann–Whitney test was used. Results: In the group of patients with crossbite, the crossbite side showed greater occlusal force than the opposite side. The total occlusal force was lower in the crossbite group than in the control group. Conclusions: In patients with posterior crossbite, an alteration in occlusal force, characterised by a higher value on the crossbite side than on the opposite side, was observed. In addition, these patients showed lower total occlusal force compared to the control group.

Background: Craniofacial clefts represent the most common congenital malformation in the head and neck region. Although most patients undergo primary cleft repair in childhood, many still present midfacial growth deficiencies in adulthood. This study aimed to evaluate and compare the incidence and indications for orthognathic surgery in adult patients with cleft lip (CL), cleft lip and alveolus (CLA), cleft lip and palate (CLP), and isolated cleft palate (CP). Materials and Methods: Sixty adult cleft patients (36 males and 24 females) born with a cleft and with a mean age of 19.51 ± 1.83 years were retrospectively enrolled in this study. All patients had undergone primary lip and palate repair during childhood at the Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Service of “Mother Teresa” University Hospital Centre in Tirana. Clinical records, orthodontic documentation, and cephalometric data were reviewed to determine the indication for orthognathic surgery. Results: The statistical analysis showed that orthognathic surgery was deemed necessary in 30% patients, including ten males (56%) and eight females (44%). The most prevalent type of cleft was CLP, accounting for 35% of all patients, and it showed the highest surgical indication rate (83.3%). Cleft patients and the need for orthognathic surgery were evaluated according to the skeletal malocclusion in three planes. The need for surgery was more prevalent in patients with skeletal class III malocclusion with maxillary hypoplasia (83.3% of surgical cases), those with anterior and posterior crossbite (21.7% of all patients), and in deep bite patients (16.7% of all patients). Additionally, all patients with facial asymmetry (15%) required orthognathic surgery, highlighting the strong association between asymmetry and surgical indication. Conclusions: Patients with craniofacial cleft, especially those with CLP and combined maxillary deficiencies, demonstrate a significantly higher need for orthognathic surgery. Quantitative assessment supports the necessity of a multidisciplinary treatment approach to address persistent skeletal discrepancies and optimize functional and aesthetic outcomes in adult cleft patients.