Since 2004, the prevalence of lameness in sheep flocks in England has reduced as farmers have adopted evidence-based management practices to control lameness. In 2011, the Farm Animal Welfare Council proposed a target prevalence of <2% lameness in sheep by 2021. This study investigated whether that target had been achieved and determined which practices were associated with prevalence of lameness. A postal questionnaire was sent to 1000 randomly selected farmers to investigate the prevalence of lameness and management practices in 2022. The geometric mean prevalence of lameness was <2% in ewes and lambs, but the median was 3%; approximately 26% flocks had <2% lameness. Data were analysed using robust variable selection with multivariable linear models. Farmers that quarantined ewes for ≥3 weeks and did not use foot bathing or foot trimming to prevent lameness had 40–50% lower prevalence of lameness than those not using these practices. Fewer farmers (19.0%) were always using parenteral antimicrobials to treat footrot, an effective practice, than in previous research (49.7%). We conclude that the target of <2% lameness in England has been achieved by 26% of farmers, and further work is required for more farmers to follow the evidence-based management practices to minimise lameness.

Footrot is one of the top five globally important diseases of sheep and causes lameness, leading to poor welfare and productivity. Transmission of Dichelobacter nodosus, the causative agent, occurs via surfaces such as pasture or bedding and persistence occurs from diseased sheep shedding bacteria into the environment; D. nodosus cannot replicate off host. High resolution proximity sensors were deployed on a flock of Poll Dorset sheep for 10–17 days at several points of the production cycle (teasing, tupping, pregnancy, and lactation (<6-week-old lambs)) between July 2018 and May 2021. Association indices between pairs of sheep were calculated, and outbreaks of footrot were simulated using a network-based susceptible-exposed-infected-recovered model. Two management approaches were modelled (1) where sheep were treated either not promptly, or effectively, resulting in long recovery times (28–100 days) and (2) where sheep were treated and recovered within 15 days, assuming ‘active management’ of footrot by the farmer using ‘best practice’ of prompt recognition of lame sheep and parenteral and topical antibiotics. Under ‘active management’ conditions (scenario 2), outbreak sizes were smaller at all points of the production cycle. This adds to existing evidence that prompt, effective treatment of sheep at all stages of the production cycle is key to reducing the prevalence of footrot in the flock, including at breeding when sheep are more likely to be in close contact.