Radiation necrosis represents a potentially devastating complication after radiation therapy in brain tumors. The establishment of the diagnosis and especially the differentiation from progression and pseudoprogression with its therapeutic implications requires interdisciplinary consent and monitoring. Herein, we want to provide an overview of the diagnostic modalities, therapeutic possibilities and an outlook on future developments to tackle this challenging topic. The aim of this report is to provide an overview of the current morphological, functional, metabolic and evolving imaging tools described in the literature in order to (I) identify the best criteria to distinguish radionecrosis from tumor recurrence after the radio-oncological treatment of malignant gliomas and cerebral metastases, (II) analyze the therapeutic possibilities and (III) give an outlook on future developments to tackle this challenging topic. Additionally, we provide the experience of a tertiary tumor center with this important issue in neuro-oncology and provide an institutional pathway dealing with this problem.

Introduction and purpose Brain metastases appear to be well resectable due to dissectable tumor margins, but postoperative MRI quite often depicts residual tumor with potential influence on tumor control and overall survival. Therefore, we introduced sodium fluoresceine into the routine workflow for brain metastasis resection. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether the use of fluorescence-guided surgery has an impact on postoperative tumor volume and local recurrence. Material and methods We retrospectively included patients who underwent surgical resection for intracranial metastases of systemic cancer between 11/2017 and 05/2021 at our institution. Tumor volumes were assessed pre- and postoperatively on T1-CE MRI. Clinical and epidemiological data as well as follow-up were gathered from our prospective database. Results Seventy-nine patients (33 male, 46 female) were included in this study. Median preoperative tumor volume amounted to 11.7cm³ and fluoresceine was used in 53 patients (67%). Surgeons reported an estimated gross total resection (GTR) in 95% of the cases, while early postoperative MRI could confirm GTR in 72%. Patients resected using fluoresceine demonstrated significantly lower postoperative residual tumor volumes with a difference of 0.7cm³ (p = 0.044) and lower risk of local tumor recurrence (p = 0.033). The use of fluorescence did not influence the overall survival (OS). Postoperative radiotherapy resulted in a significantly longer OS (p = 0.001). Discussion While GTR rates may be overrated, the use of intraoperative fluorescence may help neurosurgeons to achieve a more radical resection. Fluoresceine seems to facilitate surgical resection and increase the extent of resection thus reducing the risk for local recurrence.

Metastases are the most frequent intracranial malignant tumors in adults. While Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) and Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) are known to have significant impact on overall survival (OS), temporal muscle thickness (TMT) has been postulated to be a promising new parameter to estimate prognosis. Patients who received a resection of one to three brain metastases in our institution were included. Temporal muscle thickness was measured in preoperative MRI scans according to a standardized protocol. In 199 patients, the mean TMT was 7.5 mm (95CI 7.3–7.7) and the mean OS during follow-up was 31.3 months (95CI 24.2–38.3). There was no significant correlation of TMT and preoperative or follow-up CFS and KPS. While CFS and KPS did significantly correlate with OS (p < 0.001 for each), no correlation was demonstrated for TMT. CFS showed a superior prognostic value compared to KPS. TMT failed to show a significant impact on OS or patient performance, whereas the clinical scales (KPS and CFS) demonstrate a good correlation with OS. Due to its superiority over KPS, we strongly recommend the use of CFS to estimate OS in patients with brain metastases.

Background: Radiation necrosis (RN) is a possible late complication of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), but only a few risk factors are known. The aim of this study was to assess tumor location in correlation to the development of radiation necrosis for skull base (SB) and non-skull base tumors. Methods: All patients treated with radiosurgery for benign neoplasms (2004–2020) were retrospectively evaluated. The clinical, imaging and medication data were obtained and the largest axial tumor diameter was determined using MRI scans in T1-weighted imaging with gadolinium. The diagnosis of RN was established using imaging parameters. Patients with tumors located at the skull base were compared to patients with tumors in non-skull base locations. Results: 205 patients could be included. Overall, 157 tumors (76.6%) were located at the SB and compared to 48 (23.4%) non-SB tumors. Among SB tumors, the most common were vestibular schwannomas (125 cases) and meningiomas (21 cases). In total, 32 (15.6%) patients developed RN after a median of 10 (IqR 5–12) months. Moreover, 62 patients (30.2%) had already undergone at least one surgical resection. In multivariate Cox regression, SB tumors showed a significantly lower risk of radiation necrosis with a Hazard Ratio (HR) of 0.252, p < 0.001, independently of the applied radiation dose. Furthermore, higher radiation doses had a significant impact on the occurrence of RN (HR 1.372, p = 0.002). Conclusions: The risk for the development of RN for SB tumors appears to be low but should not be underestimated. No difference was found between recurrent tumors and newly diagnosed tumors, which may support the value of radiosurgical treatment for patients with recurrent SB tumors.

Background and Objectives: The biological behavior of gliomas is influenced by various factors including molecular features and treatment response. This study investigates the prognostic implications of a second tumor in patients with glioma at time of diagnosis. Given the increasing number of patients presenting with multiple primary malignancies due to improved cancer survival and diagnostic accuracy, understanding the influence of double tumor burden on glioma outcomes is of growing clinical relevance. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed adult patients with intracranial gliomas (WHO grade 2–4), who were surgically treated between 2015 and 2022 at our institution. Patients were categorized into two groups: glioma only and glioma plus additional solid malignancy. We compared progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) using Kaplan–Meier and Cox regression analyses. Results: Among 426 glioma patients, 75 (17.6%) harbored a second non-brain tumor. Patients with multiple primaries showed significantly poorer OS (median 6 vs. 14 months, p = 0.002). No significant difference in PFS or OS was observed for patients in case the systemic tumor was in complete remission as compared to those with sole glioma. However, patients with progressive or stable systemic tumor had significantly worse outcomes regarding OS (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Our findings suggest that the presence of a second systemic malignancy is an independent prognostic factor for worse outcome. Further studies are mandated to elucidate genetic situations and refine therapeutic strategies for these patients.

Introduction: The age of patients requiring surgery for spinal metastasis, primarily those over 65, has risen due to improved cancer treatments. Surgical intervention targets acute neurological deficits and instability. Anticoagulants are increasingly used, especially in the elderly, but pose challenges in managing bleeding complications. The study examines the correlation between preoperative anticoagulant/antiplatelet use and bleeding risks in spinal metastasis surgery, which is crucial for optimizing patient outcomes. Material and Methods: In a retrospective study at our department from 2010 to 2023, spinal tumor surgery patients were analyzed. Data included demographics, neurological status, surgical procedure, preoperative anticoagulant/antiplatelet use, intra-/postoperative coagulation management, and the incidence of rebleeding. Coagulation management involved blood loss assessment, coagulation factor administration, and fluid balance monitoring post-surgery. Lab parameters were documented at admission, preop, postop, and discharge. Results: A cohort of 290 patients underwent surgical treatment for spinal metastases, predominantly males (63.8%, n = 185) with a median age of 65 years. Preoperatively, 24.1% (n = 70) were on oral anticoagulants or antiplatelet therapy. Within 30 days, a rebleeding rate of 4.5% (n = 9) occurred, unrelated to preoperative anticoagulation status (p > 0.05). A correlation was found between preoperative neurologic deficits (p = 0.004) and rebleeding risk and the number of levels treated surgically, with fewer levels associated with a higher incidence of postoperative bleeding (p < 0.01). Conclusions: Surgical intervention for spinal metastatic cancer appears to be safe regardless of the patient’s preoperative anticoagulation status. However, it remains imperative to customize preoperative planning and preparation for each patient, emphasizing meticulous risk–benefit analysis and optimizing perioperative care.